Ok, so now we know that the WR misquoted as JD pointed out (I don't recall
Bookhout's testimony but do remember Fritz noting that Oswald said he was
out with Shelley).
I wouldn't be worried about the WC inventing alibis for Oswald - it's
probably a mistake, which you found out.
Unfortunately, Shelley never mentioned that he spoke to Oswald after the
assassination, HOWEVER, the friggin' WC lawyer didn't specifically ask
Shelley that question during the hearing (you'd think he would to quash
what LHO told the authorities).
So is it still a question or issue?
"Ray" <j.raymondcarroll@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:4641b44e-e7fc-46b5-bee8-89a3c1e837bb@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Jul 17, 8:37 pm, "Gerry Simone" <newdecent...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
Perhaps you should check the testimony of Bill Shelley, even if not a
direct quote to that claim you refer to.
I checked Shelley's testimony, and there is no reference to a 5-10
minute conversation. No witness, and no re****t I could find, says
anything about a 5-10 minute conversation. The only explanation up to
now is that the Warren Commission simply INVENTED it (I.e MADE it UP,
FABRICATED it).
In the grand scheme of things, (as G.A.'s response implies), does it
really matter?
Does it really matter that the Warren Commission invented things out
of whole cloth?
It does not matter to GA, obviously, but what about people who are
interested in the truth?
|
