Greg Jaynes wrote:
> On Jul 20, 10:41 am, Anthony Marsh <anthony_ma...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> Bud wrote:
>>> On Jul 18, 3:42 pm, Anthony Marsh <anthony_ma...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>> Greg Jaynes wrote:
>>>>> On Jul 6, 9:32 pm, Anthony Marsh <anthony_ma...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>>>> WhiskyJoe wrote:
>>>>>>>> So, another myth goes up in
>>>>>>>> smoke. Mr. Myers is
>>>>>>>> positively ON TAPE stating
>>>>>>>> his belief that a conspiracy
>>>>>>>> existed in Dealey Plaza when
>>>>>>>> JFK was killed.
>>>>>>>> Maybe Mr. Marsh (or other
>>>>>>>> CTers) can now start up a
>>>>>>>> new theory -- the
>>>>>>>> "Kelin Tape Is A Fake"
>>>>>>>> theory.
>>>>>>> Or better yet, maybe they will
>>>>>>> go with the two Myers theory.
>>>>>> No, as I said before, the answer is that Dale Myers is a liar.-
Hide quoted text -
>>>>>> - Show quoted text -
>>>>> This is a perfect example why normal people dismiss assassination
buffs as
>>>>> kooks.
>>>> This is a perfect example of why normal people dismiss WC defenders
as
>>>> being part of the cover-up.
>>> CT are the ones covering up on behalf of their beloved patsy.
>> More nonsense. Many conspiracy believers think that Oswald was part of
>> the conspiracy. That's what the HSCA concluded.
>>
>>>>> Dale Myers is THE most credible and thorough author on the subjects
of
>>>>> J.D. Tippit, the acoustics, the Z-film and Badge Man there is.
PERIOD
>>>> Junk.
>>> Those that can`t criticize those that can.
>> Yeah right. I am the guy who corrected the map which Myers relied on.
>
>
> What map? I saw Dale Myers and Todd Vaughan in Dealey plaza measuring
the
WHAT MAP?? Why are you even trying to defend Dale Myers when you didn't
even bother to read his damn Web site and I quote:
http://www.jfkfiles.com/jfk/html/tech.htm
A survey map of Dealey Plaza, prepared by Drommer & Associates for the
House Select Committee on Assassinations in 1978, was used to plot the
layout of the plaza in three-space.
Now, compare that to my map based on my corrections from 1981.
http://the-puzzle-palace.com/ovs-scan.gif
> place. I thought it was unneccesary to do all that measuring since I
would
> have given them copies of the blueprints for the TU, streets and
drainage
> in the plaza and the later set the WPA used to build the monuments. But
> they wanted to do it their way. I suppose measuring what actually "is"
is
Measuring is im****tant for some details. Various people have made
measurements in Dealey Plaza for me. And of course Dealey Plaza changed
from 1963 to 1978 when the shooting tests were done.
> probably better than the plans for building what "is", but I think any
> descrepency would have been insignificant.
>
That's the point. Why should Dale Myers claim 99.44% accuracy if you say
that any discrepancies are insignificant? Why wouldn't just 90% accuracy
be ok then? And if the acoustical scientists are promising matches within
a foot or less, then why can't the map be off by three feet?
> Respectfully,
> Greg Jaynes
|
