seeker wrote:
> On Jul 19, 7:39 pm, Anthony Marsh <anthony_ma...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> seeker wrote:
>>> 1) Surveillance by men in suits-- standard issue dark blue or
>>> black,white****rts,standard tie
>>> 2)Telephone monitoring: evidence of re-routing calls to a listening/
>>> answer post. Purpose being to peg associates,friends, and to prevent
>>> employment; as the person notified people of this, bogus calls placed
>>> to voicemail suggesting prospective employer interest simply to cover
>>> tracks that obstructing employment options was occurring; by making
>>> calls on behalf of "interested employers", the target would have more
>>> difficulty asserting that they were being blackballed in the regional
>>> employment market
>>> 3) Pretense interviews in which the following were gathered on
>>> separate occasions (none of the jobs were granted and no followup
>>> letters or calls came or were responded to by the "prospective
>>> employer"):
>>> a) video images via interview with VideoServer,Inc.
>>> b) still photos generated during a bogus interview with White
>>> Pines software of Nashua,NH which among other things developed chat
>>> software called "CUCME"; the individual was receiving overlapping
>>> messages during normal social messenging with this software being used
>>> to send harassing messages. The individual was called for an interview
>>> there and when they showed up no one knew why they were there. As the
>>> person sat in the lobby, a camera at the receptionist station was
>>> noted in direct line to get a face shot while the person sat in front
>>> of the station.
>>> c) Written samples during a bogus "test" at Cognos software, also
>>> in Massachusetts in which when called, the interviewee, 1
>>> receptionist and 1 "personnel representative" was present in a several
>>> story complex
>>> d) An interview called for by a Massachusetts temp agency where 5
>>> minutes into the interview the interviewee was questioned about their
>>> knowledge of Woburn,and specifically,NASA
>>> e) A call for an interview by a company in which its interviewer
>>> stated that his company had a "virtually unlimited budget" based out
>>> of Switzerland and did contracts with NASA; the office suite
>>> disappeared within a few days, with no trace of the company being
>>> there
>>> f) An interview at Raytheon in which the interviewer had an NSA
>>> desktop calendar, coffee warmer,etc. and a copy of the Puzzle Palace
>>> on the shelf behind him. During the interview, another interviewer
>>> came in, mentioning about "tickets". The job never materialized and
>>> phone calls and letters to the interviewer went unanswered.
>>> 4) Subsequent monitoring of the individual as they did research at
>>> other libraries
>>> 5) Longtime associates of the person suddenly became hostile. A
>>> frequent phenomena is that of the "friend" or acquaintance making
>>> small talk and asking always how that person's car is running; this
>>> always preceded a major breakdown or perhaps sabotage of the vehicle.
>>> Evidence of steered phone conversations with these individuals, in
>>> which those individuals would ask specific questions or phrase them in
>>> such a way that to answer them might be incriminating in a recorded
>>> phone conversation.The goal appearing to be to create a record of
>>> damning testimony from that unwitting person which could be used to
>>> discredit them later.
>>> 6) Evidence that people around the person were being used as intel
>>> sources against them
>> Again, I am not interested in someone's very paranoid and highly
>> subjective story. I have read newspaper accounts. I understand that
some
>> people WANTED it in Woburn, although that would have been very stupid.
But
>> show me some do***ents saying that JFK had approved putting it in
Woburn.
>> You already got busted about the dates of establishment of Draper
>> Laboratory and Johnson Space Center. You are spreading misinformation.
>> Show me some do***ents.- Hide quoted text -
>>
>> - Show quoted text -
>
> As the saying goes..." you're not paranoid if someone is really out to
get
> you".. The person mentioned by the way, DID seek counseling and was told
> that given the FACTS of what WAS HAPPENING, paranoia was justified and
> normal
>
Try to focus. I don't care about that aspect at all. It has nothing to do
with whether or not Kennedy had approved Woburn. I have asked you dozens
of times to do***ent that with some do***ents. You can't. Because he
didn't. I don't care if Woburn wanted the Space Center. They were never
going to get it.
|
