Re: The "Black Dog Man" Is No Man At All!!!

On Jul 23, 3:59=A0pm, alexfoyle <alexfo...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> On 22 Jul., 05:44, Anthony Marsh <anthony_ma...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> > Exactly how much shadow do you think there
> > was and can you show me the drawing of how the shadow from the tree
hit=
s
> > that area? The amount of coverage?
>
> I think there was quite a bit of shadow under the tree where the bench
> was and behind the retaining wall.
>
> > > I do not agree that the skin tones of BDM are comparable to
Sitzman's
> > > here. If there are any light colors around BDM facial area than they
> > > appear to be brownish IMO.
>
> > So, you are more of a scientist than the HSCA's experts?
>
> The HSCA experts were not infallible and to determine the skin tones
> of BDM is quite hard for any analysis, because there is little to none
> skin tone to work with.
>
> > >>> Oh my, here we go again with your circling. The bottle is in the
sa=
me
> > >>> position as in the Towner photo, consider it circled.
> > >> Nonsense. Back up your assertions. The moment I disprove it you'll
c=
laim
> > >> "Oh, that's not where I meant." I've gone through this thousands of
> > >> times with people like Jack White.
> > > You didn't disprove anything, you are just at your wit=92s end
becaus=
e
> > > you, too, can probably see the bottle in the Stoughton photo as well
=
as in
> > > the color slide by Rickerby. Talk about denial.
> > No. Wrong place.
> > Not the same place.
>
> Yes, it is exactly the same place.
>
> We can have differing opinions on this, you know, no biggie.
>
> > > Why are you so desperate to bring up Badge Man again and again? He
is
> > > a fantasy contrary to Black Dog Man who is a black person or couple
> > > seen there the whole time until after the last shot by Sitzman.
>
> > Because I can indeed tell anybody what is really there and what is an
> > optical illusion.
>
> Hey, listen up everybody, Tony can "indeed tell anybody what is really
> there" and what not. We surely all believe you that the shooter behind
> the fence was "really there", because you see him there and because
> you say so, Amen.
>
> > Not my point. Someone else had a theory that the third man was Black
Do=
g
> > Man who ran down there after leaving the retaining wall.
>
> That theory makes no sense whatsoever. So the third man ran down
> where?
>
> > My point is that we CAN see other people near there, contrary to your
> > nonsense.
>
> Which people can we see "near there", please circle them.
>
> > >>> At that point nobody else had run up the stairs (so nobody else
cou=
ld
> > >>> have left the bottle), except the man who was standing on the
stair=
s
> > >>> with Hudson and he didn't have a bottle as can be seen in the
photo=
s
> > >>> and films that depict him.
> > >> A couple of people had already run up there.
>
> > > No, at that point in time nobody else except the one man from the
sta=
irs
> > > had run up there, no one! And since some researchers can see the
bott=
le
> > > already in the Moorman photo and since we have Sitzman=92s statement
=
that
>
> > I don't care what nutty claims others make.
>
> But at least you seem to admit (by omission) that nobody else had run
> up there at the moment of the Stoughton and Rickerby photos.
>
> > > the black couple was drinking sodas, there is really no other way
tha=
n to
> > > conclude that the bottle was left there by the same black couple.
>
> > The bottle could have been left there by someone else, especially by
th=
e
> > white man nicknamed Black Dog Man.
>
> Who most probably wasn't a white man at all.
>
> > BTW, take a look at page 92 of National Nightmare which shows Marilyn
S=
itzman wearing her black scarf,
> > and tell me she looks black to you.
>
> I never said she looks black to me. I just theorized that her head
> scarf might have influenced any skin tone analysis of her facial area.
>
> > You are not qualified to talk about brown versus white skin tones.
>
> But you are?
>
> > > No, they could not have been anywhere else because of the reasons I
> > > have already reiterated thrice. End of this argument, one would
think=
..
>
> > None of your arguments prove that they could not have been elsewhere.
>
> How about: They went there, like everybody else in Dealey Plaza at
> that time, to see the motorcade and the president. Why should they
> leave the area when he is about to drive by?
>
> > Again, do you think Sitzman was black?
>
> Again, don't be ridiculous.

Again with the "skin tone"!!! Have a look at the different color tones on 
the photos in the trees in towner21g.jpg and towner 31g.jpg ( I don't know

how to uplink these pics to you) pretty similar to "skin tone", isn't it.

Burb, the WC'er with 20/20 vision!