Re: The Patsy Paschall Film

I agree with you Greg...  I think an detailed analysis/enhancement of the 
Paschall film is probably one of the two or three most im****tant things 
that could be done to shed light on the case.  Wasn't one of the main 
obstacles the agent for Paschall herself?

-Stu


On Jul 23, 10:43 pm, Greg Jaynes <jay...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> Nothing ever came of the Paschall film for several reasons. Amatuerish
> handling and promotion was the main reason but there were a couple of
> other factors like it got overwhelmed by the attention the Z-film
> alteration nonsense got and Robert Groden telling anyone who would
listen
> that there was nothing to it or he would have found it. Yeah right, if
he
> was such a good researcher why didn't he notice Zapruder getting down
from
> the pedestal. You can even see that in the youtube copies sitting in
your
> own home.
>
> It's do***ented that I have claimed there is movement behind the picket
> fence on the grassy knoll. There are copies of the video of the film on
> youtube and no one can be made out. Probably no one has bothered to
look.
> But even if they did, you cannot see the detail required. I had Russ
Burr
> over to my house and showed him the movement, I don't remember if it was
> on the computer or on tape but he was skeptical. Which ever it was, it
was
> far better than anything you can see on youtube. You really have to see
it
> projected on film to appreciate it. You can see a lot of other details
> like the cars that were parked right at the corner and along the fence
> beyond the oak tree.
>
> I stand by the claim that the film shows the movement of at least two
> people behind the fence within several seconds of the headshot. The time
> of this movement is just as the gray 1959 sedan p***** the knoll in the
> foreground as can be seen even on the youtube copies of the film.  59 to
> 103 seconds on the timeline in this youtube copy:
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kiddBtPpdEM
>
> The thing that is so interesting is that there was in fact someone there
> (according to me). Now, whether it was assassins or the guy who was
> standing on the steps and ran away or people just watching from behind
the
> fence can be debated for the rest of time like everything else. But
there
> were people there. This is of course AFTER the assassination but it is
> before the crowds decended on the knoll and parking lot. Therein lies
the
> interesting point.
>
> Anyone wanting to make a do***entary would really have something new to
> discuss if they followed this up. I think the Sixth Floor Museum now
owns
> the film. It would be an interesting historical project to study this
and
> reveal it.
>
> Respectfully,
> Greg Jaynes