Re: What goes in crooked cannot come out straight

"Anthony Marsh" <anthony_marsh@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
news:DdadnWZ0BtHrFRrVnZ2dnUVZ_gWdnZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Grizzlie Antagonist wrote:


> Just because something is possible does not mean it had to happen that 
> way. And it does not help your cause when your heroes have to lie about 
> the evidence to make the SBT work.



My heroes never "have to lie".  Sometimes they lie just for the sheer 
unadulterated pleasure that they get from doing so.  But my heroes never
lie 
on compulsion.



>> Nor could they, since Connally's back wound was definitely not a sharp 
>> puncture that would have resulted from a direct hit.  That's one of the

>> reasons why the single-bullet scenario had already been established
fact 
>> since 1964
>>
>
> Again, you know nothing about ballistics so stop telling us what would 
> have resulted.



I will so!

And what I said goes double!

I'll say it again.  Connally's back wound was definitely not a sharp 
puncture that would have resulted from a direct hit.  That's one of the 
reasons why the single-bullet scenario had already been established fact 
since 1964.

There, I said it again!  What are you going to do about it?



>> Remarkable.  I guess you've proven that a bullet never did enter 
>> Connally's back, shatter his fifth rib and exit his chest.  Because, 
>> after all, it was only a "tangential" strike.
>>
>> And Zeno proved that Achilles could never outrun the turtle, no matter 
>> how much faster he was than the turtle.
>>
>
> A logical error, not a medical opinion.


I understand that Blenner is using some form of bastardized forensic
science 
for his purpose.  Zeno is using the science of mathematics for his.  The 
analogy fits.