"Anthony Marsh" <anthony_marsh@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:ividnW5qMOfIzBPVnZ2dnUVZ_rWdnZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Grizzlie Antagonist wrote:
>> "Martin Shackelford" <mshack4@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>> news:6dUik.19168$N87.10642@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> The Wa****ngton Post just published a long article satirizing Holland.
>>> They must be hippies, too, huh?
>>>
>>> Martin
>>
>>
>>
>> It's not an outrageous proposition. The Wa****ngton Post has always
been
>> a left-wing newspaper - actually, American news media is almost
>> monolithically left-wing. Woodward and Bernstein were Nixon-hating
>> hippie types, though I guess that they must have had a work ethic.
>> Benjamin Bradlee was a good friend of Kennedy's.
>>
>> However, Bradlee announced long ago that he believed in Oswald as the
>> sole assassin, explaining that his newspaper had conducted its own
>> investigation and had come up with no reason to believe otherwise. I
>> guess that given that they had the power to remove a president that
they
>> didn't like, you'd think that they would have been able to expose dark
>> forces that killed a president that they did like.
>>
>> You'd think that given their incentive and their investigating prowess,
>> they would have been able to come up with that little detail about
>> Oswald's love affair with a fat woman and their joint involvement in
some
>> sort of conspiracy against JFK and Castro involving monkeys and cancer.
>> Yeah, I know that Judyth wasn't fat in 1963, but I just couldn't
resist.
>>
>> Funny how EVERYONE who's ever looked at this overlooked those little
>> details until Tons O' Fun revealed the "truth" to you in 1999.
>>
>
> The Establishment press has always been part of the WC cove-up.
Why?
Why would an establishment press -- made up mostly of liberals and
Democrats -- and certainly made up mostly of people who personally adored
Kennedy -- why would they participate in a cover-up on behalf of his
"real" assassins?
>>> "Grizzlie Antagonist" <lloydsofhanford@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>>
news:3e9b287b-8865-4b80-93ac-54f3389a05c2@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> On Jul 25, 6:43 pm, Anthony Marsh <anthony_ma...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>> Grizzlie Antagonist wrote:
>>>> Jeez, any idiot can look at the Zapruder film and make up ridiculous
>>>> theories based misunderstanding what it shows. For example the idiots
>>>> who said one of the lead cycles knew what was going on and peeled off
>>>> towards the TSBD.
>>>
>>> http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/hargis.htm
>>>
>>>
>>> Bethell: You were sprayed with matter, and you were behind the
>>> limousine, and yet you say you initially ran to the Book Depository
>>> because of the suggestion of the direction of the shot.
>>>
>>> Hargis: Right.
>>>
>>> Bethell: But the actual - the fact that you were behind the car
>>> suggests that the shot in fact came from the front and right of the
>>> car.
>>>
>>> Hargis: Well, that right there is what I've wondered about all along,
>>> but see there's ah -- you've got to take into consideration we were
>>> moving at the time, and when he got hit all that stuff went like this,
>>> and of course I run through it.
>>>
>>> [ . . . ]
>>>
>>> Hargis: "Well, like I say, being that we know that the shot came from
>>> the School Book Depository, right then it was kind of hard to say what
>>> run through your mind.
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
|
