On Jul 24, 3:48=A0pm, geovult...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
> On Jul 23, 11:07=A0pm, burb2...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Jul 22, 9:38=A0pm, Anthony Marsh <anthony_ma...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> > > burb2...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
> > > > Hunt, while in his bedroom, writes on a pad of paper to his son
jus=
t
> > > > prior to his death;
>
> > > > "Cord Meyer discusses a plot /w [David Atlee] who brings in Wm.
Har=
vey and
> > > > Antonio Veciana, he meets with Oswald in Mexico City....Then
Vecian=
a meets
> > > > /w Frank Sturgis in Miami and enlists David Morales in
anticipation=
of
> > > > killing JFK there. But LBJ changes itinerary to Dallas, citing
pers=
onal
> > > > reasons."
>
> > > > 1) Just how are top Black Ops men supposed to know of little ol'
Os=
wald
> > > > and choose him over anyone else they might know as "possibles" for
=
a
> > > > "secondary/fake shooter?
>
> > > Because the CIA had a 201 file on Oswald and Hoover had worried
about=
the
> > > possibility that someone would impersonate Oswald. They can read,
you
> > > know.
>
> > > > 2) LBJ's "personal reasons">>>friend****p w/ Cabell and/or Control
o=
ver
> > > > DPD? Yes, no, other...;
>
> > > > 3) IF, according to Hunt himself, that David Morales chooses
Lucien=
Sarti
> > > > as the pro killer, why choose a mental "loose canon" like LHO to
be=
the
> > > > "red herring" shooter>>>he has a history of arrogantly shooting
his=
mouth
> > > > off in TWO countries>>>why all of a sudden Hunt, et al. could
trust=
this
> > > > man to such an enormous plan>>>wouldn't his arrogance become his
Ac=
hille's
> > > > Heel>>> "yeah! I/we did it! and I'm damn proud of it because...."?
>
> > > If it was a conspiracy and they don't want to publicly take credit
fo=
r
> > > it, they would want to blame it on a patsy.
>
> > > > Also: Hunt then says he backed out of the proposed plan, offered
by
> > > > Sturgis; because, Hunt wouldn't be involved with any plan that
Bill
> > > > Harvey's in, as Hunt claims Harvey was "an alcoholic
psycho">>>ther=
efore,
> > > > being out of it, what if any facts of the killing would Hunt
really=
know?
>
> > > Supposedly Hunt only knew about the offer.
>
> > > > 4) As per Hunt's son: why get him involved in the destruction of
ev=
idence
> > > > from the Watergate gig>>>this claim, while not being pertinent to
J=
FK,
> > > > does go to state of mind - Hunt and son???
>
> > > > IOW...please give me a reason(s) why I should believe in a Hunt
cnx=
.. when
> > > > it comes to JFK...thx! =A0Burb- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > - Show quoted text -
>
> > A "conspiracy" in which LHO would agree to shoot from a place which
> > would make escape very difficult? I guess he was a suicidal patsy
> > then...- Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -
>
> As far as difficulty of escape, the fact that LHO was an employee with
no
> previous record or suspicion, makes it relatively easy to escape (as
show=
n
> by the fact that he was passed right over in the initial sweep of the
> building). =A0It would be far more difficult for a team or individual
> "outside" shooters to escape the building unseen. =A0Beyond that, the
gra=
ssy
> knoll position would be far more difficult a position to shoot and
escape
> from unseen.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
I do agree geovult! Logic must prevail here and that is why I find it so
hard to swallow that LHO would only give himself seconds>minutes to get
off that floor and say, back to an innocent position in the bldg or out of
the bldg altogether! Tha's my problem with the timeline UNLESS one
subscribes to the fact that after the deed was done, LHO's raison d'etre,
that he just did NOT CARE if he was caught or not - that his
arrogance/hatred for others who he deems the reason for his failed life is
MORE im****tant than the legal consequences which might follow....? IF he
does care about the consequences, then WHY so little time to allow for an
escape?
|
