On Jul 20, 9:57=A0pm, "Grizzlie Antagonist" <lloydsofhanf...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
wrote:
> "Herbert Blenner" <a1ea...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>
>
news:6866bb03-55cc-4b5e-959d-58edd5c1a2b4@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Jul 20, 11:40 am, Grizzlie Antagonist <lloydsofhanf...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Jul 19, 7:45 pm, Herbert Blenner <a1ea...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> > > On Jul 19, 1:05 pm, Grizzlie Antagonist <lloydsofhanf...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> > > wrote:
>
> > > > On Jul 18, 8:32 pm, Herbert Blenner <a1ea...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> > > > > On Jul 18, 5:15 pm, Grizzlie Antagonist
<lloydsofhanf...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> > > > > wrote:
>
> > > > > > On Jul 18, 12:38 pm, lanc...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
>
> > > > > > > On Jul 17, 9:22 pm, Herbert Blenner <a1ea...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
wro=
te:
>
> > > > A prime example of that distortion is that diagram with the crazy
> > > > quilt
> > > > drawing of a bullet making several twists and turns to accommodate
=
the
> > > > single bullet scenario.
>
> > > You are mistaking me for Wecht.
>
> > All of you look alike to me. You're from the same hive.
> > I have fixed the broken link.
> >http://mysite.verizon.net/a1eah71/temps/tumbling.jpg
> > Goodbye.
> > Herbert
>
> By golly, Herbert Blenner, that sure is a GREAT simulation that Dr.
> Lattimer performed.
>
> You know (giggle giggle), I'll have to admit that notwithstanding my
> bravado (giggle giggle), I was somewhat skeptical of that silly old
> "single bullet theory" (****ge ****ge wink wink).
>
> But now that YOU (of all people!!!!!!!!!!!!!) have provided me with the
> results of an experiment in which Dr. Lattimer was repeatedly able to
mak=
e
> Carcano bullets tumble after striking necks, what can I say? =A0My
> adroitly-hidden skepticism has withered away.
>
> I mean, it was one thing for me to SAY that the single-bullet scenario
ha=
d
> been verified fact since 1964, but by golly, it was another thing
entirel=
y
> for you to find the results of an experiment that FURTHER VERIFIED IT!
>
> Notice how Lattimer says that with Bullet Number 4, he was able to cause
=
a
> "near duplicate" of Kennedy's neck and collar wounds? =A0And to THINK
tha=
t
> some people continue to argue that "whatgoesincrookedcannot come out
> straight". =A0Aren't those people a caution now? =A0Aren't they?
>
> Although he doesn't say so, I take it that Lattimer is satisfied that
his
> experiment also resulted within a standard variation of not only
> simulating JFK's neck and collar wounds but all of Connally's wounds as
> well.
>
> This is certainly a red-letter day, Herbert Blenner. =A0You deserve to
tr=
eat
> yourself to a celebrattion. =A0Goto the store and get yourself a bottle
o=
f
> Manischewitz and a box of Cheez-Its. =A0Turn on your stereo and treat
> yourself to an evening-long round rendition of music in celebration of
th=
e
> mobility of a Carcano bullet: =A0Culture Club's "I'll Tumble For You".-
H=
ide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
Grizzlie...YOU DA MAN!!! I'd pay real money (and I mean Canadaian dollars,
as your dollar isn't really a dollar anymore!) to hear you talk! I've got
stomach pains from laughing so hard!
|
