On Jul 30, 11:40=A0pm, burb2...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
> On Jul 20, 9:57=A0pm, "Grizzlie Antagonist" <lloydsofhanf...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > "Herbert Blenner" <a1ea...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>
>
>news:6866bb03-55cc-4b5e-959d-58edd5c1a2b4@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > On Jul 20, 11:40 am, Grizzlie Antagonist <lloydsofhanf...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> > wrote:
>
> > > On Jul 19, 7:45 pm, Herbert Blenner <a1ea...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> > > > On Jul 19, 1:05 pm, Grizzlie Antagonist
<lloydsofhanf...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> > > > wrote:
>
> > > > > On Jul 18, 8:32 pm, Herbert Blenner <a1ea...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> > > > > > On Jul 18, 5:15 pm, Grizzlie Antagonist
<lloydsofhanf...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> > > > > > wrote:
>
> > > > > > > On Jul 18, 12:38 pm, lanc...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > On Jul 17, 9:22 pm, Herbert Blenner <a1ea...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
w=
rote:
>
> > > > > A prime example of that distortion is that diagram with the
crazy
> > > > > quilt
> > > > > drawing of a bullet making several twists and turns to
accommodat=
e the
> > > > > single bullet scenario.
>
> > > > You are mistaking me for Wecht.
>
> > > All of you look alike to me. You're from the same hive.
> > > I have fixed the broken link.
> > >http://mysite.verizon.net/a1eah71/temps/tumbling.jpg
> > > Goodbye.
> > > Herbert
>
> > By golly, Herbert Blenner, that sure is a GREAT simulation that Dr.
> > Lattimer performed.
>
> > You know (giggle giggle), I'll have to admit that notwithstanding my
> > bravado (giggle giggle), I was somewhat skeptical of that silly old
> > "single bullet theory" (****ge ****ge wink wink).
>
> > But now that YOU (of all people!!!!!!!!!!!!!) have provided me with
the
> > results of an experiment in which Dr. Lattimer was repeatedly able to
m=
ake
> > Carcano bullets tumble after striking necks, what can I say? =A0My
> > adroitly-hidden skepticism has withered away.
>
> > I mean, it was one thing for me to SAY that the single-bullet scenario
=
had
> > been verified fact since 1964, but by golly, it was another thing
entir=
ely
> > for you to find the results of an experiment that FURTHER VERIFIED IT!
>
> > Notice how Lattimer says that with Bullet Number 4, he was able to
caus=
e a
> > "near duplicate" of Kennedy's neck and collar wounds? =A0And to THINK
t=
hat
> > some people continue to argue that "whatgoesincrookedcannot come out
> > straight". =A0Aren't those people a caution now? =A0Aren't they?
>
> > Although he doesn't say so, I take it that Lattimer is satisfied that
h=
is
> > experiment also resulted within a standard variation of not only
> > simulating JFK's neck and collar wounds but all of Connally's wounds
as
> > well.
>
> > This is certainly a red-letter day, Herbert Blenner. =A0You deserve to
=
treat
> > yourself to a celebrattion. =A0Goto the store and get yourself a
bottle=
of
> > Manischewitz and a box of Cheez-Its. =A0Turn on your stereo and treat
> > yourself to an evening-long round rendition of music in celebration of
=
the
> > mobility of a Carcano bullet: =A0Culture Club's "I'll Tumble For
You".-=
Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -
>
> Grizzlie...YOU DA MAN!!! I'd pay real money (and I mean Canadaian
dollars=
,
> as your dollar isn't really a dollar anymore!) to hear you talk! I've
got
> stomach pains from laughing so hard!- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
Allow me to bring you up to speed.
Doctor Lattimer published a demonstration that exposed two drawings by Dox
and testimony by Larry Sturdivan as communicating falsehoods.
The HSCA SUP****TED the single-bullet scenario in the only way permitted by
the evidence. They let the pictures do the lying. In perhaps the most
outrageous obstruction of understanding published by the House Select
Committee on Assassinations, the Forensic Pathology Panel presented a
graphic entitled, "Figure 46. - Drawing of a typical entry wound,
displaying an asymmetrical abrasion collar from a distant rifle shot with
a trajectory at an acute angle to the skin surface."
http://history-matters.com/archive/jfk/hsca/re****tvols/vol7/html/HSCA...
Their graphic combined a wildly tumbling bullet entering a target at
normal incidence with an oval abrasion surrounding an elliptical hole. The
panel complemented their contradictions of the foundations of forensic
analysis in their following graphic labeled, "Figure 47. - Drawing of an
entry wound caused by a tumbling or yawing missile."
http://history-matters.com/archive/jfk/hsca/re****tvols/vol7/html/HSCA...
This graphic showed a bullet with negligible yaw entering a target with a
considerable incidence angle and an oval abrasion surrounding a
rectangular hole with rounded corners.
Larry Sturdivan testified that an elliptical hole with dimensions of 8 mm
by 15 mm would have to have been made by a yawed bullet that struck
something else before it struck Connally. He further stated that the
entry elliptical wound indicates that the bullet hit something before
striking Connally.
Obviously the elliptical entry wounds on the head and back of President
Kennedy shows the falseness of Sturdivan's testimony.
Herbert
|
