On Mon, 23 Jul 2007 05:12:46 -0700, Klaudio Zic
<rtrrt@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> spoke thusly:
>Evangelist Luke re****ts an eclipse of the sun, but is he correct? We
>slightly modified the biblical re****t for the benefit of the
>scientifically minded faithful. An eclipse happened at crucifixion
>time as re****ted by the evangelists. The detailed astronomic re****t of
>the eclipse includes biblical comments. http://www.lulu.com/astrology
Luke doesn't say it was an eclipse. He said that
the Sun was darkened. There's a difference.
There was a Full Moon at the Passover, which
means that there couldn't have been an eclipse
and it was therefore, a supernatural event,
which furthermore, was seen and shaking felt,
all over the empire, with some destruction.
--
Pastor Dave
When making liars happy in their word games takes
precedence over truth, Christ has been abandoned.
-unknown
Expand and go out into the ocean of your faith.
God doesn't do His deepest work in the shallowest
part of the water.
The world says that seeing is believing.
The Bible says that believing is seeing.
Doctrine is not Scripture.
|
