On Jul 23, 3:35 pm, Pastor Dave <no...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Jul 2007 05:12:46 -0700, Klaudio Zic
> <rt...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> spoke thusly:
>
> >Evangelist Luke re****ts an eclipse of the sun, but is he correct? We
> >slightly modified the biblical re****t for the benefit of the
> >scientifically minded faithful. An eclipse happened at crucifixion
> >time as re****ted by the evangelists. The detailed astronomic re****t of
> >the eclipse includes biblical comments.http://www.lulu.com/astrology
>
> Luke doesn't say it was an eclipse. He said that
> the Sun was darkened. There's a difference.
> There was a Full Moon at the Passover, which
> means that there couldn't have been an eclipse
Three evangeists re****t that there was darkness lasting three hours.
That appears to be correct.
> and it was therefore, a supernatural event,
> which furthermore, was seen and shaking felt,
> all over the empire, with some destruction.
>
> --
>
> Pastor Dave
>
> When making liars happy in their word games takes
> precedence over truth, Christ has been abandoned.
> -unknown
>
> Expand and go out into the ocean of your faith.
> God doesn't do His deepest work in the shallowest
> part of the water.
>
> The world says that seeing is believing.
> The Bible says that believing is seeing.
>
> Doctrine is not Scripture.
|
