=AB Academic Astrology | main | Sidereal + Tropical + Vedic =BB
Early eris publications 2005 - 2006
Mon, April 21, 2008 - 1:17 AM
Early Eris publications. As of August 1st 2005 when it was Xena or
2003 UB313, Eris is delienated within the X zodiac.
stores.lulu.com/astrology
http://people.tribe.net/c7a37d38-06c7-4c73-8a71-4f7cfbde1dfe/blog/0d22b89b-5=
0ad-4832-89db-ce3d9d2b95de
On Apr 15, 11:01 am, Klaudio Zic <rt...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> ODIACAL PUBLICATIONS
> ACADEMIC ZODIAC & PRECESSED ASCENDANT SET
> Copyright (c) 2007 by Klaudio Zic, all rights
reserved.http://www.lulu.com=
/astrology
> The mystery of the zodiac has haunted authors since Hipparchus. An
> orderly dissemination of the zodiacal constellations is a matter of
> observation and culture.
> Already Hipparchus used to rebuke the contem****ary authors because of
> their lack of observation and therefore poor adjustment for
> precession. Today we know that the skies are apparently rotating due
> to the phenomenon of precession. The rising constellations are thus
> distributed into different sets covering an appropriate epoch.
> The ascendant set defines the racial initiation for the epoch, thus at
> the time of King Arthur; Aries ascending meant a hero was born, while
> Crater ascending called for Grail pursuit in a knight's horoscope.
> Crater rising in the horoscope of a king alternatively meant baptism.
> Monarchs like King Clovis could be baptized under the ****tents of
> Crater.
> Nowadays Aries is no longer rising at due east, thus "No more heroes
> anymore." At the time cursed with a cowardly pharaoh, Lepus rising in
> his horoscope would define the fall of a dynasty. Thus, the ascendants
> determine the zeitgeist, rather than only individual horoscopes.
> The rich history of the zodiac (or should we say "zodiacs"?) has been
> do***ented through many experiments and errors of the past, from the
> Arabian lunar zodiac to its Vedic elaboration. The known and unknown
> drawbacks of the various zodiacal systems were present due to poor
> following of the laws of nature and astronomy.
> The zodiac has been finally defined in August 2006 after perhaps 3000
> years of blunder. The academic zodiac has its counterpart in the set
> of precessed ascendants. The number of the eastern ascendants for the
> present epoch is 16, while the zodiacal constellations are 22 in
> number.
> Why do we have 22 instead of just 13 or 12 constellations of the
> zodiac? The zodiacal constellations as defined by the sun's path along
> the ecliptic are 13 in number. Ophiuchus is the 13th constellation of
> the solar zodiac.
> The zodiac is traditionally defined by the path of the sun, the
> planets and the moon. Venus is the primary determinator of the zodiac,
> while the moon adds a constellation.
> In order to define the zodiac all we have to do is track the positions
> of Venus, since this eccentric planet defines 21 zodiacal
> constellations. The moon contributes with the 22nd constellation of
> the academic zodiac, namely Auriga.
> It must be said that only the moon enters Auriga much as only Venus
> enters Pegasus. Some constellations are less exclusive than that, most
> prominently Ophiuchus, Orion and Cetus.
> The zodiac is a complex matter of study as there is no telling at
> first sight whether a planet will enter a zodiacal constellation such
> as Cetus this year, the next or only after a longer period. If Mars
> was in Cetus this year, will it repeat its entrance into Cetus on its
> return? Complex zodiacal inquiries like this have yet to be solved
> mathematically.
> The academic zodiac being defined does not mean Venus will enter
> Scutum every time it brushes by Sagittarius, but Jupiter will surely
> enter Ophiuchus every 12 years.
> Ophiuchus could be the first familiar constellation to the zodiacal
> astrologer since it hosts the sun and the planets on regular basis.
> Orion and Cetus could follow suit as the astrologer gradually works
> out his way through the complex constellations of the zodiac.
> The ascendant set requires extended attention when working with
> horoscopes as set in other epochs. The present epoch will render 16
> eastern ascendants while other epoch will probably have much more
> ascendants. Such abundance of information is liable to puzzle the
> novice. A solid knowledge of the IAU constellations is only possible
> with some basic astronomic tuition. Some astrological programs will
> display primitive planetarium, which can be perhaps recommended for
> the first steps.
> As the lower limb of the sun touches upon IAU Orion and its precession
> is measured near to Cetus, we have experimentally included the
> hypothetical positions of sun in Orion and sun in Cetus. Albeit
> experimental in an IAU environment, those positions are historically
> correct. That applies especially to Egypt where sun in Orion makes
> sense as concern chthonic religion. As concern our IAU convention, the
> sun brushes by Orion and Cetus. The Orion Days are a special treatise
> about sun in Orion much as the Age of Cetus elaborates on a
> subdivision of the Age of Pisces.
> As a further contribution to chthonic religions, we have separated the
> ascendants and zodiacal constellations according to our own western
> psychological standards. Monoceros lives in the nether regions, thus
> representing a chthonian ascendant.
> The academic zodiac cradles the WMAP cold spot within our Witch=E5llow
> series.
> Any astrologer armed with scientific curiosity is welcome to inspect
> the rich world of the academic zodiac and precessed ascendant set,
> whether on this planet or out in the alien space. Planetocentric
> Astrology introduces experimental delineation such as sun in Cygnus,
> the galactic ascendant of the U.S.A.
> Klaudio Zic
> Copyright (c) 2007 by Klaudio Zic, all rights reserved worldwide.
> Redistribution of this file in any form is violation of the Copyright
> Law.
> This copyrighted material has been previously published as available
> fromhttp://www.lulu.com/astrology
> Copyright (c) 2007 By Klaudio Zic. All Rights Reserved. No part of this
> material may be reproduced or
> Transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or otherwise, for
> commercial purposes or otherwise,
> without the written permission of the author, except when permitted by
> law.
|
