Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Alternative > Astrology Metapsych > Re: "Return of ...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 1 of 1 Topic 4613 of 4886
Post > Topic >>

Re: "Return of the Magi" -- astrology movie trailer

by pedantus <pedantus@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Dec 7, 2007 at 04:55 AM

On Dec 6, 11:36 pm, EHWollm...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:
> On Dec 6, 7:12 pm, pedantus <pedan...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Dec 6, 7:46 pm, EHWollm...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:
>
> > > On Dec 6, 11:31 am, pedantus <pedan...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> > > > > >   Did you at least look at the Durer illustration?
>
> > > > > I looked at the first one, I have seen these before in my art
cl*****.
> > > > > Irrelevant, as I say,because HE created the composition, and if
you
> > > > > don't think that is im****tant, you are completely ignorant of
art as a
> > > > > whole. It also (as in astrology and psychology) is very
im****tant to
> > > > > understand the context and INTENT of the artist at the time of
> > > > > conception--just like astrological natal charts.
>
> > > >    So your version of enlightened psychology, astrology, whatever,
> > > > demands that you need not address the material under discussion?
>
> > > >   Do you have substantive lucid opinions as to how the natal chart
of
> > > > Durer is either 'present' or not 'present' in the expression of
Durer
> > > > (via HIS composition)...or do you need to have Durer strapped to
chair
> > > > in your parlor so that you may attempt to brow beat him into
saying
> > > > what you wish to hear..:) Obiviously he would appear to you as one
> > > > unintetionally referring his natal chart while *talking* to the
great
> > > > observer of all thing astrological..:)  If not, what then?
>
> > > > >A child may scribble
> > > > > a drawing that shows how frustrated they are at one point, and
how
> > > > > happy they are at another, one could not then deduce that the
child
> > > > > was either permanently disfunctional nor stable and content.
>
> > > >  *Or* they could just be showing us what time of day they were
born,
> > > > as well as where ther natal Mars and Moon is located:
>
> > > >http://pedantus.free.fr/Horoscopic_Expressionism_01/
>
> > > >  But
>
> > > > > artworks that are PLANNED and use skills that artists develop
(like
> > > > > astrologers develop skils) are far more less telling of
impetuous
> > > > > tem****ary states of being.
>
> > > >    Technique is not art. Material is not art. Art is a
transcendant
> > > > abstract guiding essential form of potential.  For an astrologer,
we
> > > > could say Art is why planets in aspects 'create' different
meanings.
> > > > Art exists *before* one's perception and intepretation of It. It
> > > > handles the artist, all artist 'know' this, Ed.
>
> > > >    There is no such thing as a willed artistic identity, one can
only
> > > > will to release their innate potential for artistic
self-expression.
> > > > Individuals actually exist...they don't have to learn to be
individuals,
> > > > only how to communicate it successfully...and most do not, of
course...
> > > > (nothing to do at all with  Integrity...that's the irrelevant
word).
>
> > > > You don't get that because you seem to
>
> > > > > think you can just SKIP learning astrology before you try to
twist it
> > > > > into something it never was.
>
> > > >  That old strawman argument, again; you would like it better if I
> > > > didn't know how charts are 'read', but you are deceiveing yourself
> > > > again.
>
> > > >  When you can READ a chart, which REAL
>
> > > > > ASTROLOGERS like me CAN do, then you can begin to put some spin
on
> > > > > your own brand of it if you wish
>
> > > >   Been there done that, its just bull. There is no such things as
> > > > astrological prediction in any form, however astrology itself does
> > > > exist as an expressible symbolic pattern of indiviuality.  Like a
> > > > finger print, (or more like a soul print--see Kepler), not like a
> > > > program for destiny, and so on.
>
> > > > But going to a math course and
>
> > > > > saying what if 2+2 equals 5 and then going forward with a pile
of
> > > > > bull**** using quadratic equations would be just as laughed at
by the
> > > > > mathematicians as real astrologers laugh at your "analysis"
without
> > > > > demonstrating those real skills-- Comprende?
>
> > > >   I can understand you total lack of talent for allegorical
> > > > explications well enough..:)
>
> > > > Astrology is not just
>
> > > > > some fantasy that works because the astrologer is in some
stu****,
>
> > > >    Good analogy, here..:)
>
> > > >  it
>
> > > > > works because it has applicable methods that people LEARN.
>
> > > >   We know that experts don't even use rules, just memorize
thousands
> > > > of special cases...look it academic one. You don't even undrstand
the
> > > > nature of expert performance for gawd's sake.  The Air Force paid
to
> > > > find this out during one of those brief moments when they weren't
> > > > consulting you, Ed.
> > > > "[..]In a critique of the expert systems literature, Dreyfus and
> > > > Dreyfus:
> > > > If one asks an expert for the rules he or she is using, one will,
in
> > > > effect, force the expert to regress to the level of a beginner and
> > > > state the rules learned in school. Thus, instead of using rules he
or
> > > > she no longer remembers, as the knowledge engineers suppose, the
> > > > expert is forced to remember rules he or she no longer uses. ...
No
> > > > amount of rules and facts can capture the knowledge an expert has
when
> > > > he or she has stored experience of the actual outcomes of tens of
> > > > thousands of situations." [..]
>
> > > >   There are no 'real' linguistical skills demonstrating the
existence
> > > > of astrology. I have examined these for 30+ years and have seen
> > > > through them just as Geoffrey Dean has.  I genuinely understand
why
> > > > your astrology does not exist.
>
> > > >   You keep forgetting that astrology, as you say it is, just
doesn't
> > > > measure up to any form of observable reality. Kepler new that...:)
>
> > > >   You keep thinking that our "intentions" define what we will say
and
> > > > do....good luck with that..:)
>
> > > >    You need only admit that you are capable of deceiving yourself,
and
> > > > begin to inquire into things as there are in themselves--you know,
as
> > > > if something beside you aactually existed in its own right..:)
>
> > > > Rog
>
> > > > > Edmond H. Wollmann P.M.A.F.A.
> > > > > (c) 2007 Altair Publications, SAN 299-5603
> > > > > The Sunhttp://www.edmondwollmann.com/
> > > > > Consultinghttp://www.astroconsulting.com/
> > > > > Galleryhttp://www.e-wollmann.com/-Hidequotedtext-
>
> > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > - Show quoted text -
>
> > > I use astrology to help people understand themselves
>
> >   That's a claim with no sup****ting evidence.
>
> > and how their
>
> > > definitions create certain realities so that if they don't prefer
the
> > > reality they can redefine,
>
> >    Evidence?
>
> > >if you can show some similar pragmatic use
> > > of your notion here it would be much more useful.
>
> >   There is no (legitimate) *practical* use for astrology. It is as any
> > other demanding art--an avenue to consiousness expanding experience by
> > way *self* education. It requires earnest effort on the part of
> > anyone, by and for themselves. You can no more give people the ability
> > to conceive themselves ( their "reality") differently by babbling
> > about astrology than you can magically give them the ability to play
> > musical instrument. People are entertained by fortune tellers and self
> > proclaimed prophets, and the simple minded are always looking feel
> > 'empowered' on the cheap....magical thinking.
>
> >   My *use* of astrology is the practical showing that It actually
> > exists as an artistically expressed pattern of individuality, and like
> > Individuality itself, we know little or nothing about it.  Most people
> > will live and die in complete ignorance of these matters....thats
> > life.
>
> >  Rog
>
> > > Edmond H. Wollmann P.M.A.F.A.
> > > (c) 2007 Altair Publications, SAN 299-5603
> > > The Sunhttp://www.edmondwollmann.com/
> > > Consultinghttp://www.astroconsulting.com/
> > > Galleryhttp://www.e-wollmann.com/-Hidequoted
text -
>
> > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -
>
> He, he. You Roger, are full of ****. And I have filing cabinets full
> of "evidence."
>

  Maybe you'll get lucky and a cat will use your evidence cabinet as a
litter box, that's how my collection finally got thrown away...:)


> http://groups.google.com/group/alt.paranormal/msg/8943d31537e4455c
>
> http://tinyurl.com/yweu35


 Proof you can't even handle a softball?

 Better stick to pretending; you chart reading just lets everyone hear
you complaining about your own irrational egomaniacal behavior and
unresolved (petty) issues.


Rog

> Edmond H. Wollmann P.M.A.F.A.
> (c) 2007 Altair Publications, SAN 299-5603
> The Sunhttp://www.edmondwollmann.com/
> Consultinghttp://www.astroconsulting.com/
> Galleryhttp://www.e-wollmann.com/-
Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
 




 1 Posts in Topic:
Re: "Return of the Magi" -- astrology movie trailer
pedantus <pedantus@[EM  2007-12-07 04:55:33 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Fri Dec 5 11:18:25 CST 2008.