Re: So, whatever happened to Cujo?

On 2008-05-06 10:51:26 -0700, Ed Augusts <AugustsBks@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> said:

> There was a character on alt.astrology and other groups, especially
> the so-called "Kook" groups,  that consist mainly of kooks who call
> other people kooks, but aren't smart enough to see that THEY are the
> REAL kooks,  named CUJO.
> 
> CUJO was a real trouble maker, a real skeptic.. more vicious than a
> sidewinder. But it can't be denied that he helped make alt.astrology
> the group that it WAS for nearly 10 years,  he helped make it a home
> to people who HATE EVERYTHING HAVING TO DO WITH ASTROLOGY, and who
> assume that EVERY ASTROLOGER is a CON MAN looking for an easy mark...
> Yep!  That was the doin's of CUJO and his band of negatory
> buddies...
> 
> My feeling on this matter, which I researched carefully, is that
> people who are skeptics in regards to astrology and who hate
> astrology,  have BAD CHARTS.  Early on, their curious minds caused
> them to have a look at the definitions of their own Saturn-square-
> Pluto and Mars conjunction Pluto, etc., natal aspects, which are SO
> BAD, their only response is to HATE ASTROLOGY.  I blew away a skeptic
> nicknamed "Alternate Identity" this way, years ago on a.a.,  by
> analyzing his chart.
> 
> But whatever happened to CUJO,  anyway?   The last I heard of him he
> was in the Rhode Island / Connecticut / New York City area.  I heard
> some really surprising things about his family life, from one of his
> friends.  Not that he has too many friends, mind you!
> 
> Regards,   ----------Ed

When I was doing astrology, I never considered a chart to be "bad" or 
"good"...I think people are more complicated than that...

but in any case, just fyi, I wasn't considered to be one of the 
skeptics, and I have Mars opp Saturn natally.  Another person who was 
definitely considered to be one of the astrologers has the same natal 
aspect.

/shrug