"CFA" <bogus@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> skrev i melding news:1qcq2s.ma4.17.1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ~saba*gracile~ wrote:
>>"CFA" <bogus@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> skrev i melding
news:1ptvdc.kf.17.1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> Ed Augusts wrote:
>>>
>>>>Anybody here seen "malefic" Scorpio planets, badly aspected,
>>>>manifesting anger and frustration in these kinds of 'textbook' ways?
>>>>I realize Mars is said to rule or co-rule Scorpio. But just because
>>>>Mars is in one of its two 'home' signs doesn't seem to make it
>>>>adaptable, pleasant, or 'fun'. Aggression and sullen anger, to the
>>>>point of eating away at the individual, are visible.
>>>
>>> I knew a person w/a mars-saturn conjunction in Scorpio. She could cut
>>> you without thinking.
>>>
>>>>'Frank' and I don't always communicate successfully; my Venus-Mercury
>>>>conjunction is closely opposite his Sun, and his Mars closely
>>>>quincunxes my Gemini Sun. But I know he sometimes watches this Group,
>>>
>>> Is he cool with you airing this?
>>>
>>>>so he and I might both be helped by any comments you care to make .
>>>
>>> People don't get how profoundly they're guided by the state of their
>>> relation****ps with their parents (or whoever raised them).
>>
>>Or by the state of their planets.. The description of this guy fits
really
>>well to my friend, selfdestructive as can be.
>
> I like to bring my discussion about things around to states of human
> existence, rather than planets. At least we have some choices about
> our affairs- not so with chart placements.
One of them doesn't exclude the other. We don't have much choice about
partents or siblings or teachers, and planets are set up as they are,
nothing
we can do about that no. But we can be aware of our pits and afflictions
so ignoring them would be stupid.
V
>
>>V
>
> Ken
> --
> cfa at alt dot net
>
|
