On May 12, 2:35 am, Hermes <her...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> RM wrote:
>
> * [....]
> * RM: It's been obvious for about 150 posts what is real here -
> * a system has been devised to zero-in on factors in astrological
> * research data for locating statistically significant results very
> * quickly. In this example (one of the weaker ones) computer
> * simulations have repeatedly given a result of p = .004 or better.
> [...]
> * RM: The additon of several hundred more cases since the
> * basketballers' observation was first mentioned has certainly
> * confirmed the trend but it would be quite wrong for any astrologer
> * to follow your advice and make a choice about what is real in
> * relation to Virgo + Taurus until a lot more work is done.
> *
> * Of course the data is real and can be verified with Astrodatabank,
> * and the consistent trend depicted by the graph is real and can be
> * checked, and the p-score of 0.004 is real and can be verified by
> * computer simulations.
> * Ray
>
> Thanks for taking the time to reply and good luck with your
> future research. "Don't call us, we will call you."
>
> )o+
RM: Continuing on, for the others who have an interest in the Virgo-
Taurus basketballers:-
VIR + TAU basketballers
285 -- 217 -- SUN
247 -- 225 -- MOO
252 -- 200 -- MER
317 -- 209 -- VEN
326 -- 211 -- MAR
------------------------
1427 - 1062
------------------------
Ray
|
