Re: Texas murderers' chart factors

I've been trying to prove/disprove astrology for years.

For instance, I've gathered dobs online of about 17,000 criminals.
Then I ran a few computer programs to tally which signs had the most
criminals doing this and that to the data. And the results always were
biased every time, and all pretty much favored the flat (no
alterations done) run which agreed with Ray's very preliminary and
quite unmeaningful results. First place were water signs (scorp,cancer
and pisces, year of pig,goat,cat). Next were earth. Third was air.
Fire signs faired the best suggesting that the least amount of
criminals were Fire signs, (aries,leo,sag, year of dragon,monkey,rat).
There are also more water signs in the **** industry than any other
(but only about 1000 dobs pooled). Air and fire have the most
scientists (only about 5000 dobs pooled). I've run other programs too
and all seem to favor the existence of astrology. I actually initially
set out to disprove it.

I've also discovered that water signs also have the smallest heads.
Only about 500 heads were used and measured by eye only, "but" the
bias was amazing, over 60% of small headed celebrities were water
signs. This is not proof. 10,000 random heads would be needed for
that. But is impressive nonetheless.

Also most habitual people especially alcoholics are water signs
according to a 1000 celebrity pool I have of drunks. In this case, the
bias was truly overwhelming and the more additional drunk celebrities
that pop up here only keep this bias strong. Yes the sample pool is
small, but the bias is simply eye-popping.

Steve