Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Alternative > Astrology Pro > Re: Wikipedia.c...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 1 of 3 Topic 2538 of 2605
Post > Topic >>

Re: Wikipedia.com: Fraudulent and Irresponsible

by "E. H. Wollmann - The One Who Rules" <AArctophilax@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Aug 22, 2007 at 07:55 PM

On Aug 19, 3:13 pm, CFA wrote:
> JB wrote:
> >  <sigh> You DO realise, of course, that any "Readings" you give have a
> >2.000 year distention, right? If they have ANY benifit at ALL - they'd
> >be accurate 2.000 years ago, not now. Precession and all that. All, I
> >mean ALL of your meanderings are predicated on falsehoods. Choke on it.
>
> Precession isn't the problem with astrology.
>
> And did you have to quote the whole article?
>
> Ken

The "problem" is not with astrology per se, but astrologers who lack
critical thinking skills... Who believe in fairy tales and that they
are not destined by their own choices.

"The fault, dear Brutus, is not in our stars,
But in ourselves, that we are underlings."

--From Julius Caesar (I, ii, 140-141)

Edmond H. Wollmann P.M.A.F.A.
=A9 2007 Altair Publications, SAN 299-5603
Astrological Consulting http://www.astroconsulting.com/
Articles http://www.astroconsulting.com/FAQs/info.htm
Artworks http://www.e-wollmann.com/TOC.htm
 




 3 Posts in Topic:
Re: Wikipedia.com: Fraudulent and Irresponsible
"E. H. Wollmann - Th  2007-08-22 19:55:28 
Re: Wikipedia.com: Fraudulent and Irresponsible
CFA   2007-08-23 00:30:28 
Edmond Wollmann Fraudulent and Irresponsible and ironic
Bob Officer <boboffice  2007-08-23 06:25:04 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Sun Jul 6 18:23:50 CDT 2008.