E. H. Wollmann - The One Who Rules wrote:
>On Aug 19, 3:13 pm, CFA wrote:
>> JB wrote:
>> > <sigh> You DO realise, of course, that any "Readings" you give have
a
>> >2.000 year distention, right? If they have ANY benifit at ALL - they'd
>> >be accurate 2.000 years ago, not now. Precession and all that. All, I
>> >mean ALL of your meanderings are predicated on falsehoods. Choke on
it.
>>
>> Precession isn't the problem with astrology.
>>
>> And did you have to quote the whole article?
>>
>> Ken
>
>The "problem" is not with astrology per se,
Right. It's with arrogant ****heads like you.
>but astrologers who lack critical thinking skills...
As if you had the slightest clue what I meant.
>Who believe in fairy tales
Such as?
> and that they are not destined by their own choices.
Put down the mirror.
Ken
--
cfa at alt dot net
|
