On Fri, 30 May 2008 05:51:10 -0700 (PDT), Ray Murphy
<raymur@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>On May 30, 2:34 pm,
>> Ray Murphy wrote:
>> > Gratuitous answer to a non-existent question, made probably to draw
>> >people's attention to the Rejected posts page.
>>
>> Well, I gotta say there's some truth to that, though I don't
>> necessarily think your statements are wrong, or that's there any
>> problem with drawing people's attention to the rejection page. Not
>> like it's a secret or something.
>
>RM: Yes, there's truth to the observation that I was attempting to
>draw attention to the Rejected Posts page
Oh, really...? <eyes widen in wonder>
> but the question I answered
>was real because it appeared that the person who queried the term
>"native" had the impression it was a relatively obscure term. I was
>motivated to answer the question because I think that the person
>asking about it is a real native of one of the NDN tribes.
No one asked about the term "native". If they did, give me the
link.
>> But folks are needlessly cranky over there lately. Notice you aren't
>> the most-moderated right now :-)
>
>Yeah it's all quite whacky. I was asked to assist with moderation for
>a second time recently and then when I pressed the "Reject" button (to
>reject 200+ posts during the mail bombing campaign) instead of
>pressing "Ignore", I was:
>(a) Abused for failing to follow a direct instruction (that wasn't
>issued)
It was issued in my initial request for your "help". Something
that no one will ever make the mistake of doing again. (Asking
for your "help", that is.) And I never would have if Kjell
weren't terribly ill *and* traveling across country on emergency
family business.
>to press the "Ignore" button
Asked you to do it in my very first email to you. Which I DO
have, and COULD post, but I don't do that sort of thing.
> :-))
>
>Ray
Yes, everyone's "asleep at the wheel" but you, Ray. Keep
dreaming. Nightie night.
<taking my final bow, exiting stage right>
|
