On Jun 1, 6:07 pm, Jyeshta <whate...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> On Fri, 30 May 2008 05:51:10 -0700 (PDT), Ray Murphy
>
> <ray...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >On May 30, 2:34 pm,
> >> Ray Murphy wrote:
> >> > Gratuitous answer to a non-existent question, made probably to draw
> >> >people's attention to the Rejected posts page.
>
> >> Well, I gotta say there's some truth to that, though I don't
> >> necessarily think your statements are wrong, or that's there any
> >> problem with drawing people's attention to the rejection page. Not
> >> like it's a secret or something.
>
> >RM: Yes, there's truth to the observation that I was attempting to
> >draw attention to the Rejected Posts page
>
> Oh, really...? <eyes widen in wonder>
>
> > but the question I answered
> >was real because it appeared that the person who queried the term
> >"native" had the impression it was a relatively obscure term. I was
> >motivated to answer the question because I think that the person
> >asking about it is a real native of one of the NDN tribes.
>
> No one asked about the term "native". If they did, give me the
> link.
RM: Make up your mind. First you say it didn't happen and then you ask
for a link to it.
I've already stated where the question was raised - on the Rejected
posts page - for which I have a screen capture, but I'm sure Bob will
post the question again if he gets an assurance that some fool won't
reject it again..
> >> But folks are needlessly cranky over there lately. Notice you aren't
> >> the most-moderated right now :-)
>
> >Yeah it's all quite whacky. I was asked to assist with moderation for
> >a second time recently and then when I pressed the "Reject" button (to
> >reject 200+ posts during the mail bombing campaign) instead of
> >pressing "Ignore", I was:
> >(a) Abused for failing to follow a direct instruction (that wasn't
> >issued)
>
> It was issued in my initial request for your "help". Something
> that no one will ever make the mistake of doing again. (Asking
> for your "help", that is.) And I never would have if Kjell
> weren't terribly ill *and* traveling across country on emergency
> family business.
>
> >to press the "Ignore" button
>
> Asked you to do it in my very first email to you. Which I DO
> have, and COULD post, but I don't do that sort of thing.
RM: Well now's the time to put up or shut up.
Place an edited or unedited version of your imaginary proof here.
Ray
|
