On Wed, 22 Aug 2007 16:49:21 -0700, in alt.astrology,
EHWollmann@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
>On Aug 20, 2:15 pm, Rich <rcollett...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> There are two ways of looking at the world - through faith and
>> superstition or through the rigours of logic, observation and evidence
>> - in other words, through reason. Professor Richard Dawkins takes a
>> look at the battleground between superstition and reason.
>
>> All 5 videos athttp://www.irreligious.net/?q=node/80
>
>You will have to raise the level of your discourse, and provide some
>of the very thing you profess to employ--evidence, that you have a
>real knowledge of astrology. No one, not even Dawkins, can intepret,
>operationalize or debate a level at which they themselves do not, or
>cannot, function.
However the evidence is in Edmond, Astrology is not operative, it is
a false function. An artifact of a *type one statistical error*.
Astrology doesn't not have a functional cause and effect.
>I laid the groundwork for this years ago and have distilled the
>critical issues here.
>http://www.astroconsulting.com/FAQs/info.htm
You laid out nothing at all Edmond, you are still nothing more than a
cheat and fraud. You are a ulcerous chancre upon humanity. An idiot
crying about a fraudulent art.
>Edmond H. Wollmann P.M.A.F.A.
Still parading around a hobby group as if it gives any sort of
credence or licensing?
I wonder if pickpockets and s****oil salesmen had a professional
organization too?
--
Ak'toh'di
|
