On May 15, 5:07=A0am, dead <kosmicg...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> good points
> not knee deep in these sort of debates so alot of it Zip'd over my
> head.
> symbolism..... you agree it might point to something? there are claims
> to definition and the debate whether is won or changeable these days.
> i cant see us stopping people with their own vocabulary. fighting over
> symbol is hard work.
> as to 'the point', there are various dressing for satan and the symbol
> itself is in debate. where it points Could be literal, a force of
> metaphysics, or the psyche.
>
> or merely fiction. santa claus is real thou he still gets around, not
> everywhere that's a myth of course. there is an official santa.. why
> not a original satan? this definition of satan is supposition unless
> you happen to see the guy, then it is still supposition. i saw santa
> and i believe but it is not a fact that he is real i am pu****ng my
> belief because ive met the guy
>
> could be... he's real, and he's symbolised. sentient being conveyed to
> various culture.
>
> its up to you guys what the shape of the symbol is like because i am
> ignorant, but where the issue is more general what the ****'s it
> pointing at a force or a psyche maybe even a arch demon... why not all
> of them get a validation as long as they are correct in their own
> sphere. for standard history traces the word but you can't negate
> everyone.. from this chair its all Suppose, we have to find him to
> know!
symbull: a poem by piph
=2E
my alpha bets your
numb burrs
propagate
without love
=2E
|
