Re: 10 Tips For Dealing With James Randi: Claim Your Million Today!

On Tue, 13 Nov 2007 02:34:44 -0000, TOH100 <toh100@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
wrote:

>On 12 Nov, 07:57, Michael Gray <mikeg...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> On Mon, 12 Nov 2007 04:34:41 -0000, TOH100 <toh...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> >On 12 Nov, 04:00, Michael Gray <mikeg...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> >> On Sun, 11 Nov 2007 17:03:14 -0800, TOH100 <toh...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>> >> wrote:
>>
>> >> :
>>
>> >> >Randi is a fraud.
>>
>> >> That is an actionable libel.
>>
>> >An empty threat.
>>
>> >An article about this has been up onSollog'ssite since the year 2000
>> >and there has been no action.
>>
>> >I have also seen the proof myself so my opinion stands.
>>
>> >> >He refused quake predictorSollog'sapplication for the million
dollar
>> >> >challenge back in 2000.
>>
>> >> What proof do you have of this assertion?
>>
>> >The article below fromSollog'swebsite has more about this.
>>
>> >http://www.247news.net/2000/20001011-randi.shtml
>>
>> This is no more than juvenile bleating.
>> Where is the proof?
>> I asked for proof.
>> You have not supplied it.
>>
>> >If it is wrong in any way then I'm sure Randi would have sued by now
>> >since his minions are eager to make such threats.
>>
>> >The fact he hasn't sued speaks volumes.
>>
>> >The proof is a notarized application form sent to Randi. I have seen
>> >it. Randi has it, so why don't you ask him to send you a copy?
>>
>> You have seen it, you say?
>> How is that proof that it was sent?
>> Did you see it at the JREF office?
>> How are you so damn sure that it was sent?
>> Did you think to make a copy
>>
>> Be a man, and admit that you have no proof.
>
>Randi would not accept the notarized form that was put up on Sollog's
>site for 5 years for all to see. You can go back to timestamped usenet
>posts to confirm that the application form was posted on Sollog's site
>since 2000. That is your proof that the application to Randi was made.

So why can't you show it to me?

>In addition to the forms, Sollog PUBLICALLY CHALLENGED Randi back in
>2000.
>
>Randi refused the public challenge that was FOR NO MONEY, NOT EVEN FOR
>1 CENT.

Changing the rules of the challenge makes the application invalid.

>The public challenge was for Sollog to predict a quake over 6.5 within
>3 days and 250 miles. Sollog also had to accurately predict a
>hurricane.
>
>Randi refused to acknowledge that is a demonstration of paranormal
>abilities.  Current science is not able to predict earthquakes or

Sollog has never got around to submitting a formal application, that
followed the very simple rules.

You are still expressing actionable libels.