Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, October 2007

in article 13jqcdgobhijj11@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Lady Azure at
laddie@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
's.org wrote on 11/16/07 1:06 AM:

> Marcia wrote:
>> 
>> in article hfWdnVE1kojZcqHanZ2dnUVZ_ournZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 John "C" at
>> honestjohn@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote on 11/15/07 9:14 PM:
>> 
>>> 
>>> "Marcia" <what@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>> news:C3625785.1226C%what@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> in article 8Nydnff0O6oNdKHanZ2dnUVZ_qOknZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 John
>>> "C" at
>>>> honestjohn@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote on 11/15/07 8:50 PM:
>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> "Marcia" <what@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>>>> news:C362444B.12164%what@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> in article OrOdnZWif4nXSqHanZ2dnUVZ_hKdnZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> John
>>>>> "C" at
>>>>>> honestjohn@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote on 11/15/07 7:32 PM:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> "Marcia" <what@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>>>>>> news:C36235B8.120E6%what@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> in article 4MudnW05If5xW6HanZ2dnUVZ_tOtnZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>> John
>>>>>>> "C" at
>>>>>>>> honestjohn@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote on 11/15/07 6:22 PM:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> "Marcia" <what@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>>>>>>>> news:C36229B0.12082%what@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> in article
>>> d8ydnaB2pY-vJaHanZ2dnUVZ_uCinZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>>>> John
>>>>>>>>> "C" at
>>>>>>>>>> honestjohn@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote on 11/15/07 5:19 PM:
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> "Marcia" <what@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>>>>>>>>>> news:C3620F99.11FD2%what@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> in article
>>> rMednZIiZ7g8PqHanZ2dnUVZ_rSrnZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>>>>>> Hagar
>>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>>>> hagen@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote on 11/15/07 2:53 PM:
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> "John "C"" <honestjohn@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in
>>> message
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>> news:NcWdnXtNr_-17KHanZ2dnUVZ_sqinZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> "Bob Officer" <bobofficers@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in
>>> message
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Who was the kook that was around here a few months
>>>>> ago,
>>>>>>>>>>> blamed
>>>>>>>>>>>> everyone of sending him the sasser virus? I thought
>>> he
>>>>>>> got
>>>>>>>>>>>> formosa'd.
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Nice Deco Dick Slurp, Savage Bob!  I give it a "9.8".
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Your Pal,
>>>>>>>>>>>> HJ
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Seems that drunken Injun can't help but having a
>>> little
>>>>>>>>>>> slurpfest whenever
>>>>>>>>>>>> he espies DecoDick's ROOTabago, innit .....
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> John, talking to yourself is a prime kooksign.
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> This will be quite a surprise to Hagar to hear that he's
>>>>>>> just
>>>>>>>>> my
>>>>>>>>>>> Sock.  He may not like this news.
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> LOL. Sorry; I really did think (Charles?) was your sock
>>>>> when
>>>>>>> I
>>>>>>>>> read this
>>>>>>>>>> message.
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> I've never been able to understand why when someone slams
>>>>> (The
>>>>>>>>> Most Hated Person On Usenet) Art Deco everyone assumes
>>> that
>>>>>>> it's
>>>>>>>>> me or a "Sock".
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Hagar and Charles (neither are my socks) don't get along.
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Deco's only "Slurpee" is Injun Bob Officer, right now.
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Now answer me one, What is this rumor that you are rrock's
>>>>>>> sock.
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Number One  (Hey that rhymed - rrock's sock)
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> I haven't heard that rumor. You know he died, don't you?
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> I knew his "Demon Bot" smoked and died.  Is he building-up
>>>>> another
>>>>>>> one so that he can be "Top Poster"?
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Ah, so this is about competition? All I know is, I got an
>>> email
>>>>> from his
>>>>>> wife in my in-box this morning.
>>>>> 
>>>>> OK, I'll bite, what did he die from?
>>>>> 
>>>> No clue. She didn't say, and I didn't think it was my place to
>>> ask.
>>> 
>>> I take it that there will be no more "sekret Code" in your
>>> messages ever again?
>>> 
>>> Number One
>>> 
>> 
>> I wouldn't bet anything on the sekrit code. Everyone uses it, including
you.
> 
> No it is a Binary which is mixed into the message proper, few use it.

No, that's not what he was talking about.