On Tue, 6 Jun 2006 23:26:33 +0000 (UTC), you@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Your Name Here=Harvey) wrote:
>In article <go2682dc257162b7p1g87dmrt4flc0ittk@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
whatever@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
says...
>>
>>On Sun, 4 Jun 2006 00:18:56 +0000 (UTC), you@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>(Your Name Here=Harvey) wrote:
>>
>>>In article <ju8p72lsg502sj2cqdcc9qdqsf9v8uq4h0@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
whatever@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
says...
>>>>
>>>>On Sat, 27 May 2006 12:23:39 -0500, Jyeshta <whatever@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>>>>wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On Fri, 26 May 2006 16:07:50 -0400, Kimba W. Lion
>>>>><KimbaWLion@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>Jyeshta <whatever@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>There's no option for reading the Introduction.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Here's the page:
>>>>>>http://makeashorterlink.com/?J61532C2D
>>>>>
>>>>>Thanks! I'll take a look.
>>>>
>>>>I think I understand what she means now. That there *is* that
>>>>particular heavenly place everyone talks about, but that our loved
>>>>ones stick around us, at least part of the time, to partake of the
>>>>lessons we are trying to learn here on earth.
>>>
>>>There seems to be two views to this subject.
>>>
>>>As far in the affirmative goes...
>>>
>>>1. It's as per mediums - whatever you wish to believe in this area,
>>> that you can have some kind of communication with those passed over,
>>> who are in a better place.
>>>
>>>2. It's not as per mediums - that their information is retreived via
>>> ESP means. That we cannot have communication, as per mediums all the
>>> time. And that are very very few mediums who can genuinely contact
>>> spirits, and they don't tell, are not in the news or media - and
would
>>> number on one's hand.
>>> (This is via the Plejaren/Billy Meier information).
>>>
>>>
>>>I did tape an interview with Allison Dubois and have it available to
>>>download, via filesharing --- but you have to have a lot of patience to
>>>download, because of queue problems...
>>>
>>>Harvey
>>
>>Hi Harvey,
>>
>>How would I download that tape? I've never used Bit Torrent, by the
>>way, if that's what it's on. Thanks.
>>
>>Gail
>>
>
>OK, there is resource, in which you can download almost anything you
>wish to?
>If you have the money, you can purchase original tapes and videos, etc
>from the usual sources - amazon.net or whatever.
>If you haven't, but have broadband access, there are "filesharing"
programs
>which allows you download much the same material as above, and more.
>eg. stuff that people may have taped themselves, off television, etc.
>
>One such program is emule, another is xolox. The later is a bit buggy.
>Both are relatively easy to download and install.
>If you get really stuck in setting it up, go to www.sharevirus.com
>(Don't worry, it's nothing about viruses as such...)
>
>I have made the Allison Dubois interview available (she was interviewed
>on Australian and New Zealand television, regarding her book release) -
>but you need to be very very patient, as you have to queue...
>If anyone knows of a free website, that has many megs available? 50-100?
>I could upload these and other short clips, as I like to make these
>available to anyone wanting to view them?
>The Allison Dubois clips are - 46 meg, 7 meg, 62 meg and 29 meg in
length.
>I have a reincarnation clip of 83 megs, which is about a 10 year old
American
>Boy who recalled being a Corsair pilot during WWII.
>There is "The Day I Died", a large part of this british television
program,
>about near death experiences, that is 312megs.
>Something about spirit photography that is off "Beyond" with James van
Praagh,
>that is 42 megs, "Did Jesus Die?" the last 1/4 of it, being 106 megs,
>which takes you to his tomb in Kashmir, this ties in with the
>Talmud Jmmanuel material stuff, by the way.
>
>Someone ought to be setting up a website, where these can be downloaded
from?
>I don't have the money to do just that - plus there's the legal side to
it,
>you can get sued for having basically copyrighted material, on a
website...
>That's why filesharing has flourished.
>The reason why the files are not so huge, is that all these are in VCD
>quality - which is approx old videotape quality. I was archiving these
onto
>CDr's but now that blank DVD+R media is so cheap these days, I'll
probably
>have to go back and rearchive them again?
>Basically all of these files are of viewable quality - it's only if
you're
>viewing them on a large screen television, expecting DVD quality, that
you
>may feel disgruntled? Re-recording all these again, will only slightly
>increase the quality of them. I will do it one day, I guess - as at some
>time in the future I will be able to afford a new TV???
>Anyway I have been collecting a lot of do***entaries, and have a ton of
>stuff on DVDs - the above list is stuff that I have recorded off TV here,
>in NZ. I have a whole list of other stuff, downloaded off via emule -
>and there are about two other sites besides www.sharevirus.com
>which have do***entaries available, which only have links for filesharing
>programs such as emule...
>
>Oh, you have to leave your computer on, for days at a time, to download
>programs/files - because of the very long queue times, and very very slow
>downloads...
>
>It would be quicker if I sent the files on a DVD to you, which I don't
>mind doing. All you need to do, is find my email address, which is pretty
>easy, if you search for - kiwilove, Harvey, plain2 and stuff I'm into,
>eg. social volleyball, atari computers hawkquest, laserhawk
>
>Harvey
Hi Harvey,
Thanks for explaining. I don't have emule or Xolox installed, only
Soulseek, which I am avoiding using these days. Have you considered
uploading the interviews to a Usenet binaries group, such as
alt.binaries.sounds.mp3.radio or somesuch? You can do it with a
program called Powerpost, I think. Takes just a bit of practice to
get it right. All the Sylvia Browne audio interviews I have were
downloaded from the binaries radio groups.
Gail
|
