"RD (The Sandman)" <rdsandman(spamlock)@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:Xns99B55F82594D0Sandman@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Leif <leifrakur2@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in
> news:1190610475.683296.272440@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>> On Sep 23, 7:55 am, "RD (The Sandman)"
>> <rdsandman(spamlock)@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>> Leif <leifrak...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote
>>> innews:1190409691.547147.53540@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> > On Sep 21, 10:42 am, "RD (The Sandman)"
>>> > <rdsandman(spamlock)@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>> >> Leif <leifrak...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote
>>> >> innews:1190340183.822207.25630@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> > Leif speaking: What's the evidence in sup****t of your assertion
>>> > about the "resource pool"?
>>>
>>> That is simply how I refer to it to keep it in modern language. The
>>> point is that the state militias were drawn from the citizenry and in
>>> most cases were expected to bring their own arms not ones supplied by
>>> Art I.
>>
>> Leif speaking: In everything I find from the time of the Framers, the
>> militia were defined in state militia law, which included all citizens
>> capable of bearing arms and falling within certain age limits. There
>> was no "drawing" to be done.
>
> No one said there was. Is English your first language?
>
>> Some supplied their own guns and some
>> didn't, but there was no obligation to have a gun before reaching the
>> age of service.
>
> Again, no claim of that was made.
>
He's setting up strawman arguments to detract from that fact that he can't
sup****t the position he holds
|
