Re: Handgun ban in U.S. capital could reach Supreme Court
by The Lone Weasel <loneweasel@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
Sep 24, 2007 at 08:29 PM
"RD (The Sandman)" <rdsandman(spamlock)@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> said:
> Leif <leifrakur2@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in
> news:1190664627.886364.76610@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
22g2000hsm.googlegroups.com:
>
>>> > Leif speaking: In everything I find from the time of
>>> > the Framers,
> the
>>> > militia were defined in state militia law, which
>>> > included all
> citizens
>>> > capable of bearing arms and falling within certain age
>>> > limits.
> There
>>> > was no "drawing" to be done.
>>>
>>> No one said there was.
>>
>> Leif speaking: Then we agree that the militia consisted
>> of those who were obliged to militia service by law,
>> rather that being taken from persons from the general
>> public who happened to have a gun?
>>
>>> Is English your first language?
>>
>> Leif speaking: First above all. What's yours?
>
> Then how could you have managed to misconstrue what I said
> so badly?
As usual you didn't really say anything, Sand****er. Tell us
specifically what you say Lief misconstrued about what you
said you dissembling puke.
> Everyone else understood it.
Tell us what the word "citizenry" hs to do with the Second
Amendment.
--
Yours truly,
The Lone Weasel