On Wed, 21 May 2008 23:11:44 -0500, who@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
>On Sat, 8 Mar 2008 09:18:21 -0500, "MasterChief" <1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
>>Fags has no business telling men not to have guns.
>>
>>"Paul Hands" <jphands@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>news:b5217912-5d28-4688-a8a0-d3d1ef852902@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> Guns have no place in a civilised society. Neither does religion.
>>
>Yeah, right. Only the robbers, muggers, rapist and killers should have
>guns. The problem is that when you take guns away from everyone, gun
>crimes may go down, but all other violence with other weapons increases
>far beyond what it was when honest people could carry a gun.
>
The biggest problem is that criminals ignore the Gun Laws just like to
all the other ones regarding their illegal behaviors. Sure one can
put an end to legal weapons possession, but all the "Gun Laws" in the
world don't put an end to the illegal possession.
>In England these days, daytime burglaries are as common as night
burglaries. Who
>cares if anyone is home? After all, the don't have a gun, and if they
>even hurt a home invader or burglar too severely, the homeowner goes to
>prison. Neat system, eh? You want that here? Just take guns away from
>honest people, and many of us will standby, bound and gagged, while the
>bastards with the guns, knives, whatever, rape our wives and daughters.
>Yeah, neat system alright.
>
Most do that in the current system since we've pretty much
figuratively neutered every male on the planet into being a she-male
wannabe. Even if armed the average "Liberal" would probably end up
****ing himself prior to protecting their loved ones.
BTW -- Anyone track the level of Violent Crime in Australia after
their gun ban went into affect? The numbers did move in the direction
expected. However, in those states in the US that have gone to a
"Shall Issue" CCW Permit process & Castle Doctrine Laws have seen a
reduction in violent crime.
--
"Before all else, be armed" -- Machiavelli
|
