On Sun, 25 May 2008 06:06:28 GMT, "David Morgan \(MAMS\)"
<findme@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
><Zomby-Woof@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:ru0c34l6c7llf2uce4kq57e90fj8dpl6kj@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>> On Wed, 21 May 2008 23:16:23 -0500, who@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
>
>> >On Sun, 16 Mar 2008 19:22:24 GMT, "Doug" <noone@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
>> >>I wonder how many US servicemen would follow these orders though? I
find
>> >>it more likely there would be a civil war before your insanity would
ever
>> >>come to pass.
>
>> >Obama can't do much of anything without the permission of a clear
>> >majority in the Congress.
>
>> I seem to remember Nancy Pelosi saying the same thing about GW, but I
>> haven't seen any of the changes she promised in the first 100 days.
>> Maybe she meant a different 100 days.
>
>
>Maybe you need to learn what a "voting majority" actually looks like in
>Congress. There aren't enough dems in place (yet) to overturn, veto
>or even partially constitute the required number of "majority" votes to
>accomplish a damn thing.
>
And we would be smart to keep it that way.
--
"Naturally the common people don't want war: Neither in Russia,
nor in England, nor for that matter in Germany. That is understood.
But, after all, IT IS THE LEADERS of the country who determine the
policy and it is always a simple matter to drag the people along,
whether it is a democracy, or a fascist dictator****p, or a parliament,
or a communist dictator****p. Voice or no voice, the people can always
be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have
to do is TELL THEM THEY ARE BEING ATTACKED, and denounce the peacemakers
for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger.
IT WORKS THE SAME IN ANY COUNTRY."
-Goering at the Nuremberg Trials
|
