bren...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Brendan Jones) writes:
>David Moss (d-m...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
) wrote:
>> [List of beliefs]
>> In a constitutional monarchy
>You said earlier that the Liberal Party would accept a passionate
>republican as a member. So does that mean:
> a) Members are not required to believe in all the principles outlined
>or
> b) The Liberal Party should not in fact accept republicans as members
>Just curious.
The answer is, of course, a.
Just as the Liberals views in homo***uality have ****fted with time
(People in single-*** relation****ps were publicly encouraged to join
the party in 1995), Party views on the Republican debate are influenced
by the grassroots member****p.
Brendan will be thrilled to know that I successfully spoke _against_ an
anti-republican motion at the NSW State Convention late last year.
The most recent issue of the member****p form from which I took the
"We Believe" tract does not include the reference to the constitutional
monarchy. I will get around to re-keying it soon.
David Moss,
personal opinion only.
http://groups.google.com.au/group/aus.politics/browse_thread/thread/135e56da551cf4ec/1d7451a91fffe7dd?hl=en
