In article <vhflp2djqpof1ca92amidtk9iign4ob2k6@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
Johnny America <noemailyetbud21@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> LISTEN CAREFULLY
>
> "The truth of that matter is, if you listen carefully, Saddam would
> still
> be in power if he were the president of the United States, and the
> world
> would be a lot better off."
> –George W. Bush
>
> SADDAM'S HANGING VERDICT IS ILLEGAL AND UNJUST
> http://www.uruknet.info/?p=m29377&hd=&size=1&l=e
>
>
> America, the ungodly
>
> http://www.stlimc.org/usermedia/audio/8/america_the_ungodly.mp3
> http://baltimore.indymedia.org/usermedia/audio/8/america_the_ungodly.mp3
> http://istanbul.indymedia.org/uploads/2006/12/america_the_ungodly.mp3
> http://cleveland.indymedia.org/uploads/2006/12/america_the_ungodly.mp3
> http://dc.indymedia.org/usermedia/audio/8/america_the_ungodly.mp3
> http://sf.indymedia.org/uploads/2006/12/america_the_ungodly.mp3
> http://miami.indymedia.org/uploads/2006/12/america_the_ungodly.mp3
> https://israel.indymedia.org/usermedia/audio/8/america_the_ungodly.mp3
> http://www.phillyimc.org/media/2006/12//35295.mp3
> http://media.indypgh.org/uploads/2006/12/america_the_ungodly.mp3
> http://www.ntimc.org/attachments/dec2006/america_the_ungodly.mp3
> http://newmexico.indymedia.org/uploads/2006/12/america_the_ungodly.mp3
>
http://buffalo.indymedia.org/local/webcast/uploads/metafiles/america_the_ungod
> ly.mp3
> http://newjersey.indymedia.org/media/2006/12//12910.mp3
> http://boston.indymedia.org/usermedia/audio/8/america_the_ungodly.mp3
> http://houston.indymedia.org/uploads/2006/12/america_the_ungodly.mp3
>
>
>
> BUSH TO GENERALS: GET LOST
> http://movies.crooksandliars.com/SC-Bush-GeneralsGetLost.wmv
>
> / / Yes, those words coming from the man who’s decided the
> only way to turn things around in Iraq is by sending in more
> troop. Despite being told by the Joint Chiefs, Colin Powell
> and the man running the Iraq war, General Abizaid, that
> sending more troops to Iraq would only get more Americans
> killed Now, seeming to confirm his opponent’s worst suspicions
> that this president does not value the opinions of those with
> whom he disagrees, Mr. Bush has now decided to go it alone in
> Iraq against the wishes of his allies, against the desires of
> his fellow countrymen, and yes, even against the advice of his
> own generals. \ \
>
>
> The demon enemy of America, Our Mr. bush Jr., responsible for
> 911, creates hope in God that honorable men of this Earth,
> will assist the Humans in hunting to kill bu****e enemy
> terrorists who sup****t torturing and thieving from US, the
> godly as innocent. Every time we hear of another bu****e
> death, god celebrates OUR wins over the ungodly demon
> antichrist forces. Death to the bu****e, death to our enemies
> who murder innocent people with LIES against America and GOD.
>
>
> / / The Crown would suggest her ignorance on such subjects is
> irrelevant to her case against me, for those children's lives,
> and others like them, are not who she is working to protect.
> So, where I demand is a crime against our real God occurring I
> ask the hiding in darkness Crown to explain herself publicly
> in the light of these proceedings to our Honorable Lord. \ \
>
>
> -
>
> LET IT BE KNOWN
>
> Let it be known, that the senior management national news
> reducers of CBC and CNN, know full well, they would rather
> watch American Soldiers die as the thieving bad guys, than to
> defend God's America by re****ting that the demon enemy George
> W. Bush, and his business partner General Ahmad, committed
> the terrorist acts of 9/11, along with Rumsfeld, Rice, Cheney,
> and Myers.
>
> We shall, start there, and continue on until we've nabbed
> every last treasonous culprit found at the ends of the ample
> crimes scene leads. Propagandized stupider than the fates
> will allow, an American is universally recognizing itself as
> an enemy to their own cowardly dying selves. For, my friend,
> America's America will not stand undefended with these beliefs
> of mine I give freely. Soldiers along with honorable Police
> officers I would ask, to bravely/politely demand our time
> on national broadcasts for the spoken defense of Justice for
> America. For, Johnny wants to debate the bu****e publicly on
> the validity of the Iraq war, considering that it has no true
> justifiable cause. Meaning: all stolen revenues will be
> returned to the Iraqi people, with interest, paid for by those
> responsible for stealing it. Justice Johnny has now
> officially arrived on the scene to hunt bu****e down to the
> ends of life - to teach'em with kind words, or the other way
> with graver sentences handed down by us believers in freedom
> from tyranny. Hint: Don't **** with the real People of God
> who are refusing to take more chances with enemy bu****e
> neo-con bull****. An innocent person shall not be imprisoned
> in my name, nor shall they be tortured, robbed, or murdered.
> Bu****e enemies that don't like that arrangement, we arrest,
> try, and if convicted on the war crime capital offenses of
> first degree mass murder, such as we will find regarding
> Mattis, Blount, Russell, and Sattler, Allawi and Doud, then,
> and only then, we together will joyously have them publicly
> executed for the good of the entire human species. In the
> name of Jesus, Allah has spoken for life in which all are
> granted equal privilege to love with everything we are
> together alone with the stars. Death to the ungodly bu****e,
> instead of the innocent they target for plunder with
> treasonous lies as a betrayal to our real names. God and the
> Great America.
>
> ---
>
> Realize, CNN and CBC have received this post, yet, continue to
> lie to dying soldiers for the unholy benefit of the enemy
> neo-con.
>
>
> The "Shock and Awe" Gallery©
> http://www.marchforjustice.com/shock&awe.php
>
> / / "The children seem to be the most openly enthused.
> They are getting a chance at a future the likes of which
> would never have been possible under the oppressive
> regime..." \ \
>
> ---
>
> When we cancel other people's human rights, we cancel our own.
>
> = Highwater =
>
>
> ---
>
> The Verdict
>
> The Winnipeg Police Department is running a fencing operation
> out of their "Exploitation" Unit. Disclosed by a current
> serving officer in the Unit during the preliminary. In one
> case used as an example, a law abiding Winnipeg business owner
> had 50,000 dollars worth of business equipment stolen, and if
> he wanted it back, he would have to make costly "legal"
> efforts through a corrupted Justice system in Winnipeg that
> holds Canadian Soldiers in complete contempt by "Law". The
> Crown has not only refusing to co-operate with defending
> Winnipeg citizenry, in relation****p to the, National problem
> of fencing through bad lawed Police action operations, and the
> lotteries [information forwarded in part by the elected
> Premier of our Province], but also, in respect to our
> sacrificing soldiers. Soldiers who Canada now knows without
> shadow of doubt, are being maliciously propagandized through
> the cor****ate mouth pieces of the most heinous war criminal of
> history, the ungodly enemy of Creation responsible for
> instituting the terrorist crimes of 9/11. Obstructing Justice
> by aiding and abetting the terrorist crimes of first degree
> mass murder in New York City is suppose to be a serious
> offence in Canada. So, as treasonous to Canadian Liberty, the
> Crown in my case is refusing to have the police chief, or
> other Crowns look into this matter. [I suggested by my Court
> motion to our Court system to consider contacting another
> office from a different province perhaps.] While the Judge,
> publicly for the Winnipeg record, agreed to side with the
> Crown instead, without stating the whys - that Justice for
> Canada would not be served under his rule on my suggestion.
> Just put a soldier in prison if they should dare stand up in
> defense with their lives for Canada is what this unjust case,
> yet to be re****ted on by our national press, is turning out to
> be actually. I would ask you once again, to please make some
> effort to get on local Winnipeg Radio, or Coast to Coast to
> plead for some defense on this matter of morality. You know,
> this Freedom thing does involve you too. So, George Norrie
> and the rest of you lot, listen, I think you've made some
> horrible judgment calls, and I'm asking you now, to live up
> to your responsibilities to my America, and invite me on for
> free discussions on these matters.
>
> All I want is to challenge the man.
>
>
> Merci.
>
>
> ---
>
> A Soldier's Life Held in Contempt
>
>
> The way I see it, is that I am completely do***ented correct
> on who was responsible for the terrorist crimes of 9/11. I
> have my own theories on why our media and police services have
> failed our Soldiers by refusing to sup****t my cause directly
> thus far, but I am far without hope.
>
> I believe the failures of me gaining direct wide sup****t
> through our police services and the Court of Queen's Bench, is
> much more so for fear of uncertainty, and lack of leader****p,
> than a general, across the board sup****t of furthering Bush's
> war crime sprees by going still silent while Canadian soldiers
> are left forsaken. I speak out publicly often regarding the
> 911 evidence in America, and email campaigns of my writings,
> done for public recognition, I'm told, continue to swell to
> near epic pro****tions. Intelligence officers the world over
> most certainly know of my position on this matter. Those who
> may sup****t the fight for Bush rule in our police services,
> can mostly only do so, risking in dishonorable blind personal
> fear of the great unknown I figure. And, crazy as this may
> sound, I believe there is a spooky cool God, for I'm walking a
> groove most all of the time.
>
>
> The affidavit that starts "1. National Security Issues" was
> submitted in conjunction with my motion to request assistance
> from the Court. The additional paper "Stand Together or
> Don't", was an added part of the same affidavit.
>
> The affidavit with 38 positions was submitted with the two
> motions, "Order of Production" and "for the Crown to Stay
> Proceedings". Duplicate copies of the same affidavit were
> submitted in each respect.
>
>
>
> ----
>
> http://www.wa****ngtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A25177-2004Mar25.html
>
> "Deputy Secretary of State Richard Armitage contradicted
> Rice's claim that the White House had a strategy before Sept.
> 11 for military operations against al Qaeda and the Taliban."
>
> This indicates that with the foreknowledge gained through
> prior experiences of Muslim fundamentalists, such as the
> Taliban, being forbidden by their religion [Jihad] to
> persecute the innocent, left the Bush Administration with only
> needing to do, and had officially done, was to use no evidence
> to back up allegations to insure invasion plans, and as a
> result, a deliberate treasonous criminal strategy to not
> follow the crime scene leads at the real murder scene to nab
> to true evil doers. For otherwise - spoil the top secret
> plot.
>
>
> --
>
> / / In another characteristic incident, Bush asserted, as he
> has repeatedly, that any decision on withdrawal of American
> troops from Iraq "will be made by military commanders, not by
> politicians in Wa****ngton DC." Congressional Republicans gave
> a standing ovation to this remark, which amounts to a
> declaration that, in the war for "freedom" and "democracy" in
> Iraq, there is no room for such trifles as control over the
> military by the civilian authorities, and subordination of
> decisions on war and peace to the democratic will of the
> American people. \ \
>
> Exactly. The demon enemy of life itself, Our Mr. bush Jnr.,
> who publicly parades his contempt for freedom and God, must
> be stopped for all costs, that include for sure, your own
> as reader.
>
> Realize, CNN and CBC have received this post, yet, continue to
> lie to dying soldiers for the benefit of the enemy neo-con.
>
> http://www.indybay.org/uploads/news-tunes.mp3
>
> http://newmexico.indymedia.org/uploads/2006/01/news-tunes.mp3
>
> These are the motions than were filed on behalf of Johnny
> Wizard's defense in Winnipeg. A man arrested for threatening the
> continuing existence of the lawless demon anti-Christ, Our Mr.
> bush Jnr. The demon nazi who murdered thousands in New York
> City as God's enemy. I, beg and plead my case to ALL that
> will listen. The tyrannies of suffering on our God happen
> when good people go silent in the face of evil. Please do not
> forsake all that is good within yourself, by leaving my call
> unheard from.
>
> ---
>
> / / Color me naive, but when I hear talk of cages, detention
> and/or concentration camps, my mind usually wonders in devious
> directions. I haven't seen anywhere in history where detention
> centers and so forth were used as freedom enhancing tools.
> View this anyway you wish, but do so at your own peril. \ \
>
>
> --
>
> AFFIDAVIT
>
> AFFIDAVIT OF JOHNNY WIZARD
>
>
> I, Johnny Wizard, in the city of Winnipeg, Province of Manitoba
> MAKE OATH AND SAY:
>
>
> 1.
>
> Pakistani ISI Director General Ahmad orders an aide to wire
> transfer about $100,000 to hijacker Atta. Ahmad later resigns
> after the transfer is disclosed in India and confirmed by the
> FBI. [Dawn, 10/8/01, Times of India, 10/9/01, Wall Street
> Journal, 10/10/01, AFP, 10/10/01] The individual who makes the
> wire transfer at Ahmad's direction is Saeed Sheikh, later
> convinced for kidnapping and murdering re****ter Daniel Pearl
> in February 2002. ABC News later re****ts, "federal
> authorities have told ABC News they've now tracked more than
> $100,000 from banks in Pakistan to two banks in Florida to
> accounts held by suspected hijack ringleader Mohamed Atta."
> [ABC News, 9/30/01] CNN also re****ts the $100,000 transfer,
> and the New York Times specifies that it came in 2000. [CNN,
> 10/1/01, CNN, 10/6/01, New York Times, 7/10/02] Ahmad's order
> must have preceded June 2000, since that's when Atta and
> others started opening bank accounts and receiving the money
> ($109,910 is received by Atta and Marwan Alshehhi between June
> 19 and September 18). [MSNBC, 12/11/01]
>
> 2.
>
> On March 3, 2002, MSNBC's Jim Miklaszewski re****ted that he
> had received anonymously, top secret presidential war strategy
> do***ents dated September 9th, 2001, originating from
> Condolezza's office, outlining a strategy to invade
> Afghanistan premised on blaming bin Laden a terrorist, but
> providing no evidence to back up the allegations, thereby
> guaranteeing criminal invasion. Only workable if Laden pleads
> innocence to a crime that hadn't yet taken place, a crime
> serious enough to "justify" sacrificing American GIs truly for
> a liquefied natural gas pipe line for pension thieving Enron.
> ["The Dahbol Working Group" and Bridas] Any evidence for any
> offense would have been sufficient to have Muslim
> fundamentalists hand Laden immediately over, as they had
> offered [as others of other nations had also] repeatedly
> during the Clinton years.
>
> CBC and CNN have still, to this day, consciously refused to do
> any follow up on the intelligence, deciding instead on behalf
> of dying people everywhere, our public devolvement of a just
> society.
>
> 3.
>
> RTÉ News - US rejects Taliban bin Laden evidence calls
> 21 September 2001 17:41
>
> The White House has rejected requests from Afghanistan's
> ruling Taliban for proof that Osama bin Laden was responsible
> for last week's attacks. According to the US Secretary of
> State, Colin Powell, the United States has enough evidence to
> try bin Laden in an American court.
>
> The US Government said there would be no negotiations.
>
>
>
>
> 4.
>
> [This following do***ent was the official damning account]
>
> Responsibility for the terrorist atrocities in the United States
> 4 October 2001
> http://www.pm.gov.uk/output/page3554.asp
>
> [This Internet Domain is Britain's Prime Minister's]
>
> "This do***ent does not pur****t to provide a prosecutable case
> against Usama Bin Laden in a court of law."
>
> The do***ent doesn't hold ANY case, as that was the strategy.... See?
>
> 5.
>
> Investigating the Investigation
> http://www.alternet.org/story.html?StoryID=17816
>
> After playing a tape of Cheney's statement, Russert asked
> Daschle, "Did the vice president call you and urge you not to
> investigate the events of Sept. 11?" Daschle flatly
> contradicted Cheney: "Yes, he did, Tim, on Jan. 24, and then
> on Jan. 28 the president himself at one of our breakfast
> meetings repeated the request."
>
> ...."[T]hat request was made" by Cheney not only on Jan. 24
> and by Mr. Bush four days later, but "on other dates
> following" as well.
>
> 6.
>
> ABCNEWS.com : FBI Called off Terror Investigations
>
http://abcnews.go.com/sections/primetime/DailyNews/FBI_whistleblowers021219.ht
> ml
>
> Two veteran FBI investigators say they were ordered to stop
> investigations into a suspected terror cell linked to Osama
> bin Laden's al Qaeda network and the Sept. 11 attacks...
>
> `You Will Not Open Criminal Investigations'
>
> 7.
>
> October 9 2001 - The Times of India
>
> "While the Pakistani Inter Services Public Relations claimed
> that former ISI [the "Pakistani CIA"] director-general Lt-Gen
> Mahmud Ahmad sought retirement after being superseded on
> Monday, the truth is more shocking. Top sources confirmed
> here on Tuesday that the general lost his job because of the
> "evidence" India produced to show his links to one of the
> suicide bombers that wrecked the World Trade Center. The U.S.
> authorities sought his removal after confirming the fact that
> $100,000 were wired to WTC hijacker Mohammed Atta from
> Pakistan by Ahmad Umar Sheikh [Omar Saeed] at the instance of
> General Mahmud [Ahmad]. Senior government sources have
> confirmed that India contributed significantly to establi****ng
> the link between the money transfer and the role played by the
> dismissed ISI chief. While they did not provide details, they
> said that Indian inputs, including [Omar Saeed's] mobile phone
> number, helped the FBI in tracing and establi****ng the link."
>
>
>
>
> 8.
>
> No evidence was brought against Laden for nine eleven, none.
> [So according to Bush's official top secret Presidential
> directives] While Laden himself claimed he played no part in
> 911. Still, to save the lives of third worlders on the brink
> of starvation, Laden agreed to hand himself over, but Bush
> refused the offer, while CBC and CNN denied to re****t on that
> fact for the behalf of now dying dismembered American GIs.
> Once the indiscriminate bombing began, targeting almost every
> building in the country of Afghanistan, Laden then claimed he
> had no choice but to fight back to defend US innocent from the
> ungodly enemies of Creation/Freedom. Then the clear to all
> fake video came out with an actor who's face wasn't even close
> to looking remotely like Laden, but for almost the facial
> hair. [Bridge of the Jamaican actor's nose is HALF as long in
> pro****tion to Laden's for example, and surely frightfully
> shocking for some, the actor doesn't even take blame for 911
> either!] Photos comparing the two faces never aired on CBC and
> CNN available in about twelve seconds with the power of the
> Internet.
>
> 9.
>
> former FBI deputy director and murder victim John O'Neill
>
> "the main obstacles to investigating Islamic terrorism were
> U.S. oil cor****ate interests and the role played by Saudi
> Arabia."
>
> 10.
>
> Alex Jones interviewing Former German Defense Minister Andreas Von
> Buelow
>
> "Bush signed W199I months before 911 ordering the FBI not to
> stop Al-Qaeda. They threatened to arrest FBI agent Robert
> Wright if he tells us what he knows."
>
> 11.
>
> Mr. Bush was quoted somewhere regarding Mr. Laden's guilt of
> complete innocence with "We don't need any evidence, we know
> he's guilty."
>
> 12.
>
> www.govexec.com/column/forwardTodaysColumn.cfm?sectionID=14
>
> " [FBI's] Edmonds concluded that do***ents clearly showed that
> the Sept. 11 hijackers were in the country and plotting to
> use airplanes as missiles. She said do***ents also included
> information relating to their financial activities. "
>
> 13.
>
> The honorable Argentinean oil company Bridas' relation****p can
> not be understated as the Bush Administration's primary motive
> on criminal invasion of Afghanistan to save his biggest
> cor****ate backers, the American pension thieving Enron.
>
>
> >From "An American demands the truth from you" by Karl W. B. Schwarz
>
> " I demand to know what energy companies were in that Cheney
> Energy Task Force meeting and what discussions there were as
> to the steps that would be taken to remove the Taliban and
> Bridas Cor****ation as the last remaining obstacle to the
> United States controlling the Trans-Afghanistan Pipeline. I
> met that company in 1999 and have known since then about the
> Bridas v Unocal, $15 billion interference of contract lawsuit
> in US District Court, Southern District of Texas. I also know
> about the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals decision on September
> 9, 2003 that upheld the Bridas $500 million arbitration
> settlement and the March 22, 2004 denial of Writ of Certiorari
> at the United States Supreme Court, Case 03-1018, Turkmenneft
> v Bridas."
>
> 14.
>
> >From "Fresh Memories of War" by Kandea Mosley, The Ithaca Journal (New
> York), 25 May 2002:
>
> "We were told there were no friendly forces," said [Army
> Private Matt] Guckenheimer, an assistant gunner with the 10th
> Mountain Division at Fort Drum. "If there was anybody there,
> they were the enemy. We were told specifically that if there
> were women and children to kill them."
>
> 15.
>
> Quote from "A Dossier on Civilian Victims of United States' Aerial
> Bombing of
> Afghanistan: A Comprehensive Accounting"
>
> by Professor Marc W. Herold Ph.D., M.B.A., B.Sc.
> Departments of Economics and Women's Studies McConnell Hall
> Whittemore School of Business & Economics University of New Hamp****re
>
> When U.S warplanes strafed [with AC-130 gun****ps] the farming
> village of Chowkar- Karez, 25 miles north of Kandahar on
> October 22-23rd,killing at least 93 civilians, a Pentagon
> official said, "the people there are dead because we wanted
> them dead." The reason? They sympathized with the Taliban.1
> When asked about the Chowkar incident, Rumsfeld replied, "I
> cannot deal with that particular village."
>
> 16.
>
> US TROOPS ADMIT SHOOTING IRAQI CIVILIANS
> http://www.veteransforpeace.org/us_roops_admit_061903.htm
>
> "American troops today admitted they routinely gun down Iraqi
> civilians - some of whom are entirely innocent.
>
> And in an admission that directly contrasts with the line
> coming out from the Pentagon's spin doctors Specialist
> Cor****al Michael Richardson added: "There was no dilemma when
> it came to shooting people who were not in uniform, I just
> pulled the trigger."
>
>
> The Crown would argue this issue isn't in her jurisdiction,
> however, it is in mine as a expressive communicator fighting
> for freedom from real tyranny. An irrational tyranny that
> only stands exercised by cor****ate "news bite" censor****p, and
> false imprisonments. An American Prosecutor put Sergeant
> Benderman in prison for refusing to kill God's children. Now,
> what do you really think America would do, if "they" knew that
> too?
>
> 17.
>
> Bush demands total impunity on the war crimes he is personally
> responsible for
>
> http://www.wsws.org/articles/2002/oct2002/icc-o12.shtml
>
> 18.
>
>
http://english.aljazeera.net/NR/exeres/FD57CF75-62E8-4C43-BF2D-2D0F0F89437B.ht
> m
>
> "Marines said the men fired on them. A senior officer said
> they had no weapons, but that with shots coming in the men
> were legitimate targets because they ran."
>
> 19.
>
> http://www.yellowtimes.org/article.php?sid=1872
>
> CAIR also wants the Pentagon to investigate a photograph
> circulating the Internet of two Iraqi boys and a U.S.
> soldier. A smiling soldier stands besides the two boys who
> are giving a "thumbs up" sign, as one of boys holds a sign
> written in English that reads, "Lcpl Boudreaux killed my Dad,
> th[en] he knocked up my sister!"
>
> (Link to photo: http://www.cair-net.org/images/lcpl11.jpg)
>
> 20.
>
> Guardian Wednesday 7, 2001 - "FBI claims bin Laden inquiry was
> frustrated"
> [this story was on Bush's top secret W199i directive]
>
> This information would take a well paid intelligence officer,
> or CBC re****ter no more that thirty seconds to look for follow
> ups. For, I know, the BBC did also a national news re****t on
> it.
>
> 21.
>
> INTERVIEWER: Are you aware that this tank is contaminated with
> radiation?
>
> SOLDIER: No, it isn't radioactive.
>
> INTERVIEWER: But we have measured it.
>
> SOLDIER: No, it isn't radioactive, not this tank.
>
> "Basra is on a river," he noted. "A DU shell poisons the
> water in a river. It poisons the gr***** and the grains. It
> sinks into the ground and poisons the water table. When it
> gets into the body, it does incredible damage. The
> combination of radioactivity and heavy metal toxicity is such
> that it affects the DNA in such a way that you get genetic
> alterations."
>
> [thousands of tons of measured radio-active toxic waste, heavy
> metals, oxidized to microscopic particles as small as a tenth
> of a micron have been deposited in our airspace, however, CBC
> and CNN have refused to inform ourselves on the scientifically
> measurable extremely serious health concern issue..]
>
> 22.
>
> Justice Department lawyer John Yoo, "In the exercise of his
> plenary power to use military force," Yoo insisted, "the
> President's decisions are for him alone and are unreviewable."
> Yoo was also quoted recently on CBC national news re****t
> regarding the torturing of innocent people to death, to state
> something like "President Bush doesn't have to justify his
> opinions to Canada or even to the United States for that
> matter."
>
> 23.
>
> The incriminating FBI email dated 22 May 2004, indicates that
> president
> Bush personally
> signed off on certain interrogation techniques in an executive order."
> (See original at
> http://globalresearch.ca/articles/FBI.121504.4940_4941.pdf)
>
>
> 24.
>
> U.S. deserter 'didn't want to have to kill babies'
>
> "Mr. House will argue that American soldiers are guilty of
> war crimes and that forcing Mr. Hinzman to fight in Iraq
> would have made him a war criminal.
>
> He will call as a witness former U.S. Marine Staff Sergeant
> Jimmy Massey, who is expected to testify that he and other
> soldiers shot more than 30 unarmed Iraqis, including women and
> a six-year-old child, at a U.S. military checkpoint."
>
> 25.
>
> http://www.wa****ngtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A45373-2004Dec7.html
>
> that a clandestine military task force in Iraq was beating
> detainees, ordering Defense Intelligence Agency debriefers out
> of the room during questioning, confiscating evidence of the
> abuse and intimidating the debriefers when they complained."
>
> 26.
>
> http://www.truthout.org/docs_04/printer_121004W.shtml
>
> A sacked CIA official is re****tedly suing the agency for
> allegedly retaliating against him for refusing to falsify his
> re****ts on Iraq's weapons of mass destruction to sup****t the
> White House's pre-war position.
>
> 27.
>
> ``I was faced with being deployed to Iraq to do what the
> infantry does, kill people, and I had no justification for
> doing so,'' he testified. ``This was a criminal war. Any act
> of violence in an unjustified conflict is an atrocity.''
>
> 28.
>
> Williams's squad stopped a dump truck, and an Iraqi climbed
> out. "Light him up!" the sergeant ordered, according to
> testimony, and the squad opened fire, killing the unarmed man.
> Williams and a squadmate re****tedly got into an argument over
> which of them had scored Company C's first kill.
>
> 29.
>
> It gets worse. We already knew about the Franklin County,
> Ohio, precinct that tallied 4,258 votes for Bush when only 638
> people had actually voted.
>
> 30.
>
> http://middleeastinfo.org/forum4970
> http://wallofhate.com
>
>
> Israeli Soldiers Going In For The Kill: A 13 year old
> Palestinian [JEWISH] school girl is about to die
>
> "It's a little girl. She's running defensively eastwards, a
> girl of about 10. She's behind the embankment, scared to
> death."
>
> "Anyone who's mobile, moving in the zone, even if it's a
> three-year-old, needs to be killed."
>
> 31.
>
> US forces unleashed more than 20 air strikes and some 60
> artillery rounds on Monday, said Major Todd Desgrosseilliers.
> [...] An AFP re****ter in the Jolan district said one building
> in every 10 had been flattened. As US-led troops closed in on
> the neighborhood overnight, at least four 900-kilogram bombs
> were dropped in the city's northwest.
>
> [destructive radius of a 900-kilogram bomb is half a
> kilometer, and all TRUE accounts of death rates for Fallujah
> alone, a city where the population was forbidden to leave,
> exceed two hundred thousand innocent souls.]
>
> 32.
>
> The Bush Administration
> In rush to defend White House, Rice trips over own words
> Friday, March 26 @[EMAIL PROTECTED]
10:12:40 EST
>
> By Walter Pincus and Dana Milbank, San Francisco Chronicle
>
> "Deputy Secretary of State Richard Armitage contradicted
> Rice's claim that the White House had a strategy before Sept.
> 11 for military operations against al Qaeda and the Taliban.
> The CIA contradicted Rice's earlier assertion that Bush had
> requested a CIA briefing in the summer of 2001 because of
> elevated terrorist threats. And Rice's assertion this week
> that Bush had told her on Sept. 16, 2001, that "Iraq is to
> the side" appeared to be contradicted by an order signed by
> Bush on Sept. 17 directing the Pentagon to begin planning
> military options for an invasion of Iraq."
>
> [ And...]
>
> http://www.wa****ngtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A25177-2004Mar25.html
>
> "Deputy Secretary of State Richard Armitage contradicted
> Rice's claim that the White House had a strategy before Sept.
> 11 for military operations against al Qaeda and the Taliban."
>
> This indicates that with the foreknowledge gained through
> prior experiences of Muslim fundamentalists, such as the
> Taliban, being forbidden by their religion [Jihad] to
> persecute the innocent, left the Bush Administration with only
> needing to do, and had officially done, was to use no evidence
> to back up allegations to insure invasion plans, and as a
> result, a deliberate treasonous criminal strategy to not
> follow the crime scene leads at the real murder scene to nab
> to true evil doers. For otherwise - spoil the top secret
> plot.
>
> 33.
>
> Blix nor Elbaradei, nor Kofi, suggested, implied, or stated,
> that Iraq had failed to comply with the newest U.N.
> resolution: 1441.
>
> HANS BLIX: "And at this juncture, we are able to perform
> professional no-notice inspections all over Iraq and to
> increase aerial surveillance..."
>
> With complete, one hundred percent access to go where ever the
> Bush Administration pleased without delay, left a situation of
> an unjust war only detrimental to an ability to bring about
> any good or better thing. American soldiers are being
> sacrificed for no better good or reason understood, for if
> progress will ever be made, it will be when they work to bring
> about a political situation that was there in Iraq before the
> Bush Administration starting murdering innocent people for
> nothing . Well, not completely, for Bremer ****pped 19 billion
> to Greenspan early on, then, hundreds of millions were sent
> back.
>
>
> 34.
>
> Professor Steven E. Jones, a tenured BYU professor, went
> public several weeks ago after releasing a 19 page academic
> paper, essentially showing how the laws of physics do not
> sup****t the WTC's freefall and, consequently, the official
> government story. It should be known that World Trade Center
> Building Seven was not struck by an airplane, yet fell exactly
> the same as the two towers.
>
> Below both towers were found pools of molten steel, only
> creatable with the heating by high explosives.
>
> Excerpts from "Me, Art Bell, and 9-11 by Lisa Guliani"
>
> The official version of the WTC collapses defy both Galileo's
> Law of Falling Bodies, and also Isaac Newton's First Law of
> Motion.
>
> ..if we know that hydrocarbon fires can only reach a maximum
> temperature of 1517 degrees Fahrenheit, how could they
> possibly have melted this steel, when the melting point of
> steel is 2,795 degrees and the boiling point of steel (when it
> becomes a molten liquid) is 5,182 degrees Fahrenheit.
>
> The existence of these burning pools of molten steel were confirmed
> by:
>
> - Mark Lorieux of Controlled Demolition, Inc
> - Peter Tully, President of Tully Construction
> - and the American Free Press newspaper
>
>
> 35.
>
> "To be truthful about it, there was no way we could have got
> the public consent to have suddenly launched a campaign on
> Afghanistan but for what happened on September 11..."
>
> Tony Blair Speaking To House of Commons Liaison Committee
>
> 36.
>
> The Wa****ngton Post, 23 September 2001.
>
> At American urging, Ahmed traveled ... to Kandahar,
> Afghanistan. There he delivered the bluntest of demands.
> Turn over bin Laden without conditions, he told Taliban leader
> Mohammad Omar, or face certain war with the United States and
> its allies.
>
> Mahmoud's meetings on two separate missions with the Taliban
> were re****ted as a "failure." Yet this "failure" to extradite
> Osama without providing a shred of eidence was part of
> Wa****ngton's do***ented design, providing a pretext for a
> military intervention which was already in the pipeline. If
> Osama had been extradited, the main justification for waging a
> war "against international terrorism" would no longer hold.
> Nor would the ready to go Patriot Act. Incidentally, when
> MSNBC contacted the Whitehouse regarding the top secret
> invasion of Afghanistan plan, it was confessed that the plan
> had been "fully implemented"
>
>
> 38.
>
> "Why of course the people don't want war ... But after all it
> is the leaders of the country who determine the policy, and it
> is always a simple matter to drag the people along, whether it
> is a democracy, or a fascist dictator****p, or a parliament, or
> a communist dictator****p ... Voice or no voice, the people
> can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is
> easy. All you have to do is to tell them they are being
> attacked, and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism
> and exposing the country to danger." -- Hermann Goering, Nazi
> leader, at the Nuremberg Trials after World War II
>
> 39.
>
> On the wall of the National Holocaust Museum: " Thou shall
> not be a victim, thou shall not be a perpetrator, and thou
> shall not be a by-stander"
>
>
>
>
> ----------------
>
>
> When we cancel other people's human rights, we cancel our own.
>
> =Helen & Harry Highwater=
>
> ---
>
> HELP ME FOR CHRIST SAKE!
>
> Please, I beg you to assist me in this cause immediately!
>
> Ack! It turns out that there IS a criminal conspiracy run out of the
> Winnipeg Police Department's Exploitation Unit!
>
> Ack!! It turns out that the Crown IS aiding and abetting the
> terrorist crimes of first degree mass murder!!
>
> Ack!!! It turns out the Judge threw this whole Revelation thing out
> without any consideration offered, while the Crown is currently
> working on a public ban of disclosure in Winnipeg on these
> continuing do***ented crimes!!!
>
> 50,000!! a pop! Stolen from law abiding business owners!!!
>
> Crimes forwarded to the public in part by the concern of Manitoba's
> Premier!!!!!
>
> SEND THIS TO EVERY RCMP OFFICER OR SOLDIER OF FORTUNE YOU CAN FIND!
>
> Send this post for me to also Winnipeg media persons or to anyone who
> will listen. If you don't, then, you ain't my friend. Come on! Do
> something for us, and I promise to help you out later if I can.
> Help me through the goodness of your heart, so we won't get
> railroaded into prison fraudulently by those that hide in darkness
> as pirates of our human will. The will to be free.
>
>
> The Crown's interpretations of my possessions are not my expressions!!
>
> I AM INNOCENT.
>
> The Judge through this whole thing out for the defense
> without any consideration offered to OUR COURT!
>
> HELP!!!
>
> ---
>
> Since I am representing myself on these particular criminal
> matters, Legal Aid is not required to lend assistance on the
> grounds that I'm not co-operating with the system as it
> operates through professional Barred representations. [I am
> eligible for walk in consultations but nothing of the sort of
> assistance I am requesting] Considering the complexity of my
> judicial matter, I would request legal assistance from the
> Court in these following areas.
>
> 1. National Security Issues
>
> I need assistance in understanding the legal statutes that our
> national security services are obligated to practice under, to
> insure our national security matters are being truly defended
> in my respect. No change in summation of my character was
> altered, after they were granted a search warrant to verify it
> was me who publicly spoke out for honorable FBI officers
> denied their rights to speak freely, then as the Court knows,
> instead of doing what they argued to grant such privilege to
> infringe on my personal liberty, enforced a less than perfect
> law that most others would buckle under, even if they harbored
> no criminal intent, and would never do anything to infringe on
> the rights of any child. For I challenge; it does not serve
> Canada's interest (in particular our teen soldiers) to
> knowingly have Canada propagandized under the serious failures
> of CBC and the National Security Services to lend no wanting
> cry to hear REAL FBI officers who factually allege, with
> evidence and everything, President Bush's business partner,
> (who was at the Whitehouse Sept. 9th working on the top
> secret invasion of Afghanistan strategy to heavily arm heroin
> pushers who war to keep women as slaves while weaponizing
> children - done all for a liquefied gas pipe line to profit
> his darling dear Enron) funded 9/11's "mastermind"
> "ringleader" Mohammad Atta. Inside sources from the RCMP have
> notified me, that in the last four years, Section D's salaried
> employees, have done practically nothing to serve Canada's
> interest in this respect. While Canada's CSIS does not have
> the legal ability to speak out publicly regarding the criminal
> transgressions of President Bush, and because of this nature
> of CSIS's position, they have almost only fears to live with
> by trying. A CSIS officer told me, many were completely aware
> of President Bush's criminality regarding his hugely
> treasonous actions of mass murder on 9/11, but could do
> practically nothing about it outside of filing the re****ts
> with the federal government, or maybe anonymously sending
> something to CBC, with no promises that anyone would actually
> read it. All the while, the senior CSIS boss brags
> contemptuously in public about his ties and commitment to his
> friends in the ISI. Perceived easily/mistakenly I'd imagine
> as a threat to all of Canada's Honorable police officers and
> Judges. [General Ahmad was the Bush junta's appointed head of
> the ISI.] I think Canada's Prime Minister Paul Martin is
> genuinely a good man, but it is hard to see him publicly take
> a stand on this issue, [if he even received said re****ts] on
> behalf of honorable police officers and soldiers everywhere,
> in defense of the human race, risking everything, considering
> he already does bring about a great deal of good for Canadians
> where he stands. [Compared to you know, a let's send the kids
> to war for whatever Harper, or nobody in Winnipeg
> ("officially" 86%) wants us to give away the public assets so
> let's do it anyway for ourselves privately Filmon] But to know
> the RCMP's Section D, sides that they can't tell us the top
> secret reason they have not perused Justice for the sake of
> Canadian soldiers who bravely put their lives on the line, of
> which some have already died, is a situation no Canadian would
> tolerate if they knew these freely available facts to decide
> for themselves. Sure we can be counted lucky that only so few
> Canadians have died thus far, but when will the sacrifice of
> Americans, Afghanis, Iraqis, and soon to be Iranians with the
> Syrians, along with more than fifty other countries officially
> marked for death by the lawlessly irrational bu****e
> terrorists, be more than YOUR willing to bare? As publicly
> re****ted repeatedly in European press, Mr. Sattler ordered
> the bombing of health care clinics in Fallujah as first strike
> targets because he didn't want doctors or nurses to "falsely"
> re****t that his forces target primarily the innocent to steal
> more from America in blood and treasure. Then under Sattler's
> command, they proceeded to monstrously murder more than two
> hundred thousand innocent souls, while covering the region in
> radio-active toxic waste that will continue to kill for a
> scientifically estimated billion or two years. Hell on Earth
> is what un- arrested Sattler represents as an enemy to all
> living things. God included. An aside: Did you know the
> commander of the Third Infantry, Maj. Gen. Buford 'buff'
> Blount III, is truly a Saudi Wahhabist in disguise, who took
> up the job at the request of the Bush junta, and subsequently
> left near 170 tons of plastic explosives unprotected for
> looting in Qaqaa? Why? Well when asked why he commanded to
> leave the weapons unattended to instead, go carnage Baghdad,
> with, I'm serious, sanctioned thieving expeditions, he
> replied, he just wanted to let us know he was there. "We just
> wanted to let them know that we're here.'' In Basra, the
> coalition is still leaving as of last week, more than 30 known
> weapons storage facilities unprotected. See, the neo-con
> peenacker gang can't steal everything without a stupid man war
> going. Left continuing unattended without national
> discussions, leaves further in it's wake, more innocent
> victims of war crimes fallen undefended. I would ask that
> instead of me seeking to find where it is written, that the
> RCMP must be committed to getting the man for nine eleven,
> perhaps I can just request we work together, for a national
> CBC radio forum kicked off by some kinda joint, international
> press release acknowledging briefly our failures to
> communicate in the past, and politely request where Canada
> could go through open line discussions on these very serious
> matters. We must not allow our soldiers to be made
> misinformed by CBC's unwillingness to bravely with honor,
> defend our great Nation. Or, perhaps, Canada might want to
> consider hiring me on as, we'll see how it goes honorary RCMP
> spokesperson?, a paid consultant for my expertise in
> recognizing the real bad guys, and then I'll go out there, and
> win the good fight by using praise with fewer insults. If we
> stay committed to defending freedom by defeating war
> criminals, we all will be the better for it. Now, take me to
> your leader.
>
> 2. Local Police Issues
>
> As so was brought to the attention of the Courts in the
> previous motions, through considering the charge that was
> brought against me, (where no criminal intent in alleged, and
> nobody can possibly see a digital image until it is already at
> least in one's possession, case closed, I'm free to go still
> without my stolen computer gear.) I discover, the child
> exploitation unit is not operating in a manner that would
> effectually reduce the proliferation of truly illegal
> materials. They have included images to demonize me that they
> must know are left legal to distribute, or for those couple
> images categorized as for sure illegal unto themselves, are
> left publicly unhindered when it comes to Police questioning
> in a manner that would concern illegal public expressions.
> Now, I personally don't believe the Courts are consciously
> operating in a nefarious manner deliberately to steal computer
> gears to sell as sadomasochists who enjoy seeing lovers of
> life go to prison falsely for five year stints, but come on,
> something seriously needs to be done in how things there are
> run. I believe the failures are, in part, do to the personal
> fears officers have of the information universe; for to
> acknowledge information sharing through p2p networks or
> Usenet, would be to witness criminal code violations by the
> score going cor****ately unaddressed. Like Bush being guilty
> for high treason in God's America for example, Iraqi church
> goers slaughtered by faithful Bush lovers, women raped by
> "freedom fighting" GIs, the *** slave trade, or that VLT's are
> being run criminally (section 209, 380(1) 380(2), 181, 52(1-4)
> with a math game scam that even a sixth grader can figure, but
> not the "Free Press" editor, or commercial savvy CJOB's Vic
> G-----. Being our city's big Bush backers, where our dying
> universe is simpler, like "we don't need any evidence, we know
> he's guilty", refuses a, trying to be responsible citizen to
> formulate their own conclusions through our media on why we
> have laws. Anyway, I need to have some one to cross check the
> "illegal" images through recorded internet domains, to see
> which ones are/were located in Canada and elsewhere, and what
> if any attempt the exploitation unit tried to limit found
> providers. I suspect many providers they would claim they
> can't do anything about, are so not because a crime is
> occurring, but in that respect, actual evidence of criminal
> conduct would be required before an internet provider, server,
> or site owner could be recommended for censor****p. Not this,
> twenty year olds look like they could be ten year olds, or
> that, simply ****d children being human should not be viewed
> in their/our minds as something youthfully beautiful.
>
> To Police effectually, I would suggest a public domain
> transparently coded checksum program checker to automatically
> recognize, known illegal materials made available free, with a
> downloadable database updated by the work of one or two
> officers monitoring currently available internet image traffic
> - classifiable almost near the speed of electricity across the
> country. This action is good to take despite my personal
> innocence or fraudulent guilt, for media labelings are
> completely impossible to designate content/control, but as
> such, shouldn't forbid Police services from locating where
> possibly actual hugely offensive content is being distributed
> through. With volunteer co- operation of programming, a user,
> server, or internet service provider could be warned of
> material almost in their possession as expression is
> classified criminal so then simply delete it, and carry on.
> I'm confident such Police planning with open for public
> appeals to fine tune further, would end putting the hugely
> profitable exploitation units across the continent almost
> completely out of business. Now, who truly wants that?
>
> 3. Constitutional Challenges
>
> This possession charge absent intent, where everybody is auto
> guilty to lose all their stolen computer gear through
> fraudulent demonization of the innocent included, is a for
> sure, crime in progress. I'd imagine if we had a public
> inquiry, we'd find what the exploitation crews are doing, is
> needing to locate only a small few arguably illegal
> depictions, then trumping up a lot of fraudulent totals.
> Figuring, I'd imagine, if they openly started convicting
> individuals for a couple of images they perhaps deleted when
> witnessed, people might begin to ask, just how much money is
> the unit taking in sold stolen merchandise? Perhaps 50,000
> dollars in a single case where the business owner of said
> stolen property wasn't even charged for a criminal offense!
> No troublesome Court appearance required to protect your
> public business image even! Generally, in cases that do reach
> trial, all images are seldomly reviewed by the Courts, and at
> the "professional" ****o viewers discretion, or the Crown, a
> small sample is only offered. [The professional ****d people
> person they have in my case I suspect is lost somewhere in
> bushville as the clinically insane, or just extremely helpful
> to my Judicial cause, thanks big guy, either way.] This has
> worked largely unhindered because lawyers for the defense
> wouldn't generally see a connection. For only one freely
> available image that you couldn't see until you already had
> it, is all that is needed to put a, loss for words Canadian,
> in prison for half a decade. Not only that, but such
> convictions insist irrationally that the guilty must also be
> ***ually deviant and require professional counseling. The law
> enforced absent rights infringed needs to be Constitutionally
> challenged as clearly unjust, and the sentencing structure as
> being seriously cruel. [What does one guilty of an actual
> assault for comparison get, or better yet, threat of assault
> that was never truly made?] So, as a result, I need the
> assistance of Constitutional lawyers who would provide me
> consultations on prepatory requirements and on the relevant
> Constitutional questions regarding this specific challenge.
> And maybe co-operation with the Crown or Police chief to tally
> records and total sales figures on cases under similar
> cir***stances to consider the exploitation unit for
> re-evaluation. [Example: The foolish, faith in ignorance
> argument given by all similar units, is that nothing can be
> securely deleted from a hard drive is assuredly patently
> ridiculous. Truly indicative however, that we do indeed have
> a real hidden problem here regarding their/our intelligence
> gathering capabilities.] While maybe sup****ting public
> discussions on how to even improve further, the valuable work
> that the exploitation unit surely does do already somewhere
> I'm sure to operate for our interests. We may together have
> to overthrow CJOB with our human skills at demanding some
> space to talk about bettering our lives by communicating
> without two minute commercials every five minutes, and opening
> up the phone lines to talk about whatever. They take too much
> from us as the clearly disenfranchised already. Like, so
> who's talk radio station is it anyway?
>
> 4. The Crown's Crown
>
> I have concerns regarding the job requirements that our
> community asks a Crown to bravely achieve. One, would be to
> pursue Justice for the principled betterment of our society.
> It is clear to anyone familiar with my case, that our
> cor****ate media managers have decided for one fear or another,
> that such noble reaches must be left from the grasp of
> Canadian soldiers and their loving giving families. This
> place the Court holds of a principle that all people should be
> treated fairly, includes those we know Bush has already had
> murdered in America under these left silenced demands for a
> true accounting by good police work completed already. The
> fear that every criminal Court Crown shrugs off when proudly
> defending the innocent in our legal challenges, seems thus
> far, absent in sup****t of Justice for Johnny. When I read
> statements from the Crown stating, John's legal arguments
> against traitor Bush is irrelevant to the case our Crown
> hold's against myself, in our name as Canadians, smacks of an
> unjust and blind totalitarian state. Cor****ately broadcasted
> uncertainty is forsaking the innocent lives of Bush's
> continuing real murder victims. Certainly, the Crown has a
> responsibility to pursue just causes, and granted, can falsely
> suspect I don't hold the best of intentions towards life with
> everything I am. However, the Crown's summations of my
> character will never change the official FBI's conclusions
> arrived at by following the crime scene leads, at the real
> murder scene, to discover who personally is still escaping
> arrest for mass murder of our good friends in New York City on
> 9/11. A crime who's principle perpetrators obviously
> faithfully count on this form of injustice to dictate
> continuous failures by our Crown to serve our public interest.
> For whatever reason, my case do***ents a cor****ate news agenda
> of non-committal in our pursuit of Justice for ourselves as
> the little people. Ourselves, including the Crown's of all
> Canada, are, without doubt, denied fair representation by CBC
> standards. Canada is being left not defending honorable
> American police officers, doing their jobs to the best of
> their ability, should not leave too, our Public's Crown
> unrepresented. (If the Crowns of Canada so willed it in our
> names.) So, I would ask that the Crown's refusal to speak out
> for Canada, while fighting to silence my cries with an unjust
> as cruel prison sentence, be investigated for obstructing
> Justice, and therefore, aiding and abetting the terrorist
> crimes of first degree mass murder. Now, how to do this...
> I'm not sure. Perhaps the Court's assistance of aid in the
> form of one or two Crown offices from a different province in
> Canada could be considered, or a Constitutional Law firm more
> up on what all I got to work with here. Look, somebody has
> tricked my nation, and subsequently our naiver youths, into
> excepting Canadians can not hear the silenced screams of
> global tyranny. If soldiers the world over need to die for
> Bush, let it be for something worth fighting. Freedom must be
> Canada, a Canada that would go if asked, in favor of Universal
> Justice always. Just ask US.
>
>
> Your Friend,
>
> John W.
>
> -----------------
>
> I know I'm innocent under the law as it currently stands, and
> in addition, I wished to teach our Courts why the law stands
> unjust against our public in other respects. With no criminal
> intent to obtain or distribute something illegal alleged
> against myself, and the simple truth that one can not perceive
> an image until it is at the very least, already in one's
> possession, says enough by itself. But most im****tantly, the
> Crown's interpretations of my possessions are not my
> expressions. Example: I could have in my possession a
> written work from one who espouses the glories of war criming,
> but I, personally, am diametrically opposed to it's unwise
> declarations.
>
>
> ---------------
>
>
>
>
> THE QUEEN'S BENCH
>
>
> WINNIPEG CENTRE
>
>
>
>
> NOTICE OF MOTION
>
>
> For an Order of Production
>
>
>
> BETWEEN:
>
>
>
>
> HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN,
>
>
>
> and
>
>
>
> JOHNNY WIZARD
>
>
>
>
>
> Accused.
>
>
>
>
>
> This Notice of Motion regarding an Order of Production is to
> have disclosed to the defense, the complete evidence without
> undue hindrance, evidence the Crown holds against the accused
> as a member of our public. These following arguments are the
> reasons why Justice must prevail in these proceedings:
>
>
> Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms section 7. "No person
> shall be deprived of life, liberty or security of the person
> except in accordance with the principles of fundamental
> justice."
>
> R. v. Stinchcombe "[...] counsel for the Crown is under a
> general duty to disclose all relevant information."
>
> In R. v. Stinchcombe, the Supreme Court of Canada held once
> again, as any legitimate Court of any land would, that the
> accused in criminal cases has a Constitutional right to full
> and complete disclosure of the Crown's case. Yet, in the
> criminal case involving myself, the Crown's refusal to return
> my legal property [such as including my actual expressions] is
> motivated by contempt for fundamental justice - for true
> accountability - by intentionally working to deceive our
> Courts through denying the evidence of one: the charge
> against me is truly fraudulent under our law as it stands
> currently, and two: that I don't already have the silent
> moral sup****t of every honorable top secret intelligence
> officer this world over.
>
>
> Canada's "Commission of Inquiry into the Actions of Canadian
> Officials in Relation to Maher Arar"
>
> "The RCMP notes that because national security investigations
> are criminal investigations, the possibility of judicial
> scrutiny always exists and the presence of this possibility
> acts as an indirect accountability mechanism." [Maher Arar was
> an innocent Canadian tortured and left for murdered by the
> irrational as criminal pro-bush forces negatively influencing
> Canadian jurisprudence.]
>
>
> Firstly, I, like any, need ready easy access to all the
> evidence the Crown holds against myself, to indicate a
> possibly hidden motive behind her criminal allegations. For
> it is in our authority as a free society that the Crown holds
> any legitimacy.
>
> It would be unfair for our Courts to side with the unjust
> Crown on not giving me ready easy access to the evidence, but
> for only by hugely limiting degrees that include costly bus
> rides, or as the seriously impractical, hundreds of thousands
> of printed texts that would likely fill roomfuls.
>
> I need to provide the evidence of my actual expressions to
> counter balance the false interpretations the Crown alleges,
> when it comes to asking where specifically the rights of a
> child are being compromised when she makes her defined as
> ***ually dysfunctional inferences. All the images on my
> computer, deleted and otherwise, are not my expressions.
> Similarly, are all the written texts on my computer those of
> words I hold to be my own personal philosophy. As indicated
> by the Supreme Court of Canada's Sharpe case, a defense
> against fraudulent accusations regarding the Rights of our
> children being compromised, can be readily addressed early on
> by understanding the possession charge in relative context to
> the personal life of the accused.
>
>
>
> R. v. Sharpe
>
> "Section 163.1(6) creates a further defence for material that
> serves an "educational, scientific or medical purpose". This
> refers to the purpose the material, viewed objectively, may
> serve, not the purpose for which the possessor actually holds
> it."
>
> So, purpose of digital media as determined illegal must
> therefore, be backed firstly by criminal intent, for without
> any intent you have no purpose. A defense is made available
> by the Sharpe decision on personal\professional conduct to
> indicate actual established purpose of accused to prevent
> blind "overreaching". The Supreme Court of Canada's deep
> concerns of "overreaching" are very much apparent in my
> particular criminal matter. Conduct of individuals who have
> lost their purpose in Police keeping, who aren't being managed
> to express through our Police actions, a public interest in
> where the "offensable" images are coming from, or came, but
> instead, where it's all going as potential new innocent ****o
> victims with millions of dollars worth of stuff they can get
> away stealing. [I've read ****o cops in America recently
> acquired 300,000 more American names of households to raid,
> off of one single server found managed in violation, but have
> taken a pause before then moving on to arrest anybody who has
> ever used the internet for whatever, to consider, just what
> have we gotten ourselves into here.] See, perfectly legal
> imagery can be made into illegal thoughts relatively quickly
> by the weaker irrationals that exist within our police
> services. Where, to prove for the record, a twenty two year
> old is only twelve, even when she has in her possession all
> her proper paperwork, completed puberty, a living mother, a
> popular working web site and historical do***entations, is
> just foolishly impossible. While at Your end Mr. Surfer
> Citizen, your demonized guilty, until proven innocent of
> thinking their faulting criminal perceptions, they do
> practically nothing to verify. Without needing to establish
> intent, they make off like bandits. See, under a simple
> possession charge, there is no allegations of intent to obtain
> or distribute something illegal, and likewise, not found a
> responsible public's interest in seeking the means of which
> the criminal content was as could be LEGALLY provided. The
> last thing we want in our dying world is a setup where private
> legal businesses are selling, promoting, and releasing content
> that only becomes illegal when the exploitation unit comes
> into your home to steal your stuff by grossly misunderstanding
> what the threat actually is.
>
> By exercising our right to perceive representations of that
> which is made freely available, is of in itself, im****tant to
> the sociologist, psychologist, concerned parent, and of
> course, the conceptualizing artist reflecting on our shared
> reality.
>
> My private and public expressions are more tuned to those who
> are personally responsible in escaping arrest for running
> death squads against innocent children in Afghanistan financed
> by the undefended as uniformed American tax paying Public,
> [10th Mountain Division] a criminal enterprise still ca****ng
> in on the rewards of bush's mass murder campaigns. Or, the
> dropping of cluster dud land mines throughout residential
> school districts to murder our children indiscriminately.
> Mercury tainted vaccines that for sure cause irreparable
> damage to North American children, or as currently, about John
> DeCamp's just released updated 2005 edition, about the secret
> White House-linked national child ***-ring entitled "The
> Franklin Cover-up." However, the real motivating factor
> [intent] in the Crown's purpose by attempting to pirate our
> public's right to defend Ourselves judiciously, is more
> specifically because I articulate the HONORABLE FBI's official
> publicly available findings on who orchestrated, and funded
> the crimes of 911. Namely, Mr. Bush Jnr. along with his
> business partner, the still escaping Lieutenant General
> Mahmoud Ahmad.
>
>
> [University of Ottawa Professor Michel Chossudovsky, has
> researched the Ahmad/Bush relation****p as do***ented by CNN
> ABC et al, and can be quested for at www.globalresearch.ca]
>
> http://www.globalresearch.ca/articles/CHO206A.html
> http://www.prisonplanet.com/new_revelations_on_911.htm
>
> The Crown to not fight on our behalf regarding this easily
> verifiable mass murder issue, is indicative of an intention,
> to cast aside the concern of all children who benefit from my
> communicating higher truths for the betterment of the entire
> public body. I ask our Court, who, in Canada, informs our
> public truthfully as I do, that the "s***bags" Canada's own
> General Hillier is referring to get Canadian youths for sure
> killed over in his nationally broadcasted barbaric adolescent
> bigotry, against all the INNOCENT students of Afghanistan, is
> of a People who factually opened up schools for girls under
> the Taliban's getting better through communicating
> leader****p?, and who outlawed Bush's heroin production, and
> the slavery and rape of women? Women who were when working at
> the Taliban's newspaper, were not required to wear burkas
> despite CBC's propaganda to the contrary?
>
> The Crown's case argues that a determined selection of legal
> images, can be sited under a labeled classification of
> "collateral images", as somehow, unto it's separated self,
> being an indicator, or summation of my unbridled character.
> Therefor, to question such interpretations I need the luxury
> and comforts of a stress free environment to ponder the
> significant meaning of each of these collateral damages
> against ourselves as the innocent the Crown argues for as a
> weapon of Justice. For, those personally responsible for
> making repeatedly easily verifiable faulting expressions with
> the evidence the Crown refuses to return to me as my legal
> property, are in all likelihood, still blabbering cor****ately
> un-accosted, the completely blind sup****t of indiscriminate
> mass murder in thoughtless praise for war criminal traitor to
> Humanity George Bush Jr., their supreme no nothing about squat
> leader. While myself, am a well do***ented public defender of
> children's rights and a studious observant researcher on media
> matters, who is schooled in the field(s) of Psychology and
> Genetics, ***uality and Religion, along with the chaotic order
> to the indivisible nature of life ourselves. [And who when
> not terribly busy building this needed defense against the
> Crown's alleged criminality, still champion the written word
> for Justice being - US all as treated fairly.]]
>
> I also need to show, how I come to be in possession of
> another's expressions, of some managed images, or some strewn
> texts.
>
> It would be unfair for our Courts to side with the unjust
> Crown on not giving me ready easy access to the evidence, but
> for only by hugely limiting degrees that include costly bus
> rides, or as the seriously impractical, hundreds of thousands
> of printed texts that would likely fill roomfuls. While
> sitting just outside my police door, could be the public
> accuser who professes proudly the deeply ignorant ungodly
> beliefs of cop killing and heroin dealing to push US all over
> the top with Bush as it's global mastermind. Knowing such an
> enemy of freedom who taunts all our judicial matters with true
> personal self contempt, is there still escaping public
> ridicule, wearing our community's Police Officer uniform,
> could create unto itself, an unneeded frustration on my part,
> for, I am a honorable defender to all that is Just. A
> honorable defender that is needing by threat of false
> imprisonment to concentrate on Justice for just myself
> personally currently. As the Court well knows, a bu****e's
> favored public intent is well established by the evidence, as
> do***ented truly criminal being the ungodly. [Hypnotized
> lawless through the mechanics of suggestion I would diagnose
> for the don't know knowing any better.] There exists no
> evidence against bin Laden for 911, nor, was any factually
> alleged to exist, and despite what Bush broadcasts
> unchallenged nationally on our airwaves privately, Saddam did
> actually let the inspectors in to go where ever they wanted
> without delay. Furthermore, indiscriminately murdering people
> with tens of thousands of cluster dud land mines, 9000
> missiles targeting public infrastructure, many multiple 2000
> pound bombs containing radio-active toxic waste, along with
> the new and improved napalm and phosphorous poison gas clouds
> all because we are in the approximate age range of 15 to 55 is
> a for sure real war crime going unaddressed publicly by the
> Crown, but not by myself. So, the Crown's interest is in
> jeopardizing the lives of our children for sure by working to
> silence my extremely rare public cries for true accountability
> here in Winnipeg.
>
> I am sworn to protect all as indicated by my recorded actions
> and praised world wide word. The National Supreme Court of
> Canada's Sharpe decision allows this defense to be made on our
> behalf.
>
> By Our Honorable Court's "Lord" siding to sup****t claims made
> by my false accusers - as the running definitive summation of
> what can be claimed as "collateral images" - [legal relative
> media content present on my computer,] while judging to refuse
> to have returned my therefore stolen legal property so I can
> adequately prepare a counter defense against the Crown's
> confusions, is nothing short of a crime in progress. At least
> it should be. By denying me the evidence the Crown holds in
> contempt of our Court, would create an undue hard****p on my,
> seeking to illuminate the facts from our vantage points.
> Having to travel back and forth across the city to view
> hundreds of thousands of media messages pertinent to my case
> at hand, left denied search tools, and a comfortable
> atmosphere, is unduly unfair for all concerned. Now, I know,
> I have to deal personally with those who sup****t such a
> criminal ungodly nature when I have no choice to, but to have
> them located in the same listening vicinity throughout all my
> inquiries on stolen legal media content, to spew their
> boastful chauvinistic fascist state partiality of how great
> George W. Bush is as their master thinking celebrated
> American Cop Killer, would leave me unfairly tensioned. I
> need the meditative comforts of home study with good coffee
> and private friends to ponder my adroit, to the point defense
> with the evidence I demand the fair right to contend.
>
>
> I hold children's rights paramount in the public defense
> stands I've made for near a decade, and privately, I'm free to
> think my way on anything. The Crown has no right to dictate
> what my private thoughts are, especially, if I'm not granted
> to speak on her conclusions with the ready made evidence she
> don't want me to have returned possession of. My legal
> property that the Crown's crew has plans to sell! God, are
> you listening?
>
> I need the luxury of computer processing that the Crown used
> to surmise her relative faulting judgment of my worth to our
> society.
>
> I need returned all my legal possessions, like my real
> expressions such as public communications, to fairly challenge
> the Crown's refusal to consider such objectiveness on who the
> one holding criminal intent actually is on this serious
> matter. So therefore, the Crown's crew should not be allowed
> by our law to sell my stolen property as they are planning,
> while surely as sadomasochists, destroying a life time of my
> written works they know mean a great deal to me personally.
> Wi****ng to deprive our rights as the community, to be granted
> fair treatment in our Court systems of accountability, is
> surely what will happen if our Honorable Judge does not Judge
> honorably against the Crown and grant me the legal return of
> my stolen property. I need to establish the mechanics of my
> specifically unique computer system, so I can establish my
> fair defense made available by the Supreme Court of Canada's
> Standing Sharpe decision.
>
> The Court recognizes finding that all declared illegal
> possessions serve a criminal purpose without any intent,
> unless found serving otherwise by made available evidence from
> the defense. [ergo my Constitutional challenge] Evidence of
> real purpose the Crown doesn't want to grant our Court,
> because usually, guilty or innocent, they do sell everybody's
> stolen stuff actually. And truly, the Crown has expressed no
> interest in assisting our Police agencies in apprehending
> those known responsible by the evidence for first degree mass
> murders. [Instead, pick on the helpless innocent little
> Jewish man bearing a cross, as cowardly brown ****rt jack boot
> nazi fascists under Hitler would have too. [surprising for
> many, it is formally illegal to be Jewish currently in God's
> Israel. As for the Crowns in my case, and the Judge, well
> they seem to be not all that bad over all. [So far... But
> this innocent people go to prison for speaking un-contended
> truths thing for me is just some extreme to the core serious
> business of ours, and good or bad, the Judges, and the Crowns,
> and the Police Officers have a paid job to do by following the
> rules designed ultimately in purpose to protect both me and
> you. So, can't we all just find a way to get our public news
> agencies to live up to our responsibilities by recognizing
> standing laws not yet enforced against the un-elected
> dictator, the monstrous war mongering American traitor
> criminal, 911's George Bush Jnr., instead of present
> company???]]]
>
> I need returned my 37,333 [minus the contended for argument]
> images to sensibly consider their feasibility to collectively
> represent the Crown's faulting illogical argument in a
> brighter picture.
>
> I need to show what I did with obtained media information on
> general terms by mechanical processing through my very
> specific as unique operating systems, and through my
> definitive writing on the very subject we are here
> considering. I need operating script batch programs that do
> specific tasks regarding general media managements.
>
> I need to show how Usenet [early raw based sub-internet
> knowledge sharing web communications system] is used, and how
> it was legally accessed by my specific personal system,
> granting me, to be a part of one of the greatest collected
> artistic expressions of the known world. And how, when using
> such services, informations aren't found perceived until, at
> the very least, they are already in one's possession, thereby
> making the Crown's standing accusation absent criminal intent
> clearly unjust. [those responsible for
> distribution/expression of actual for real illegal depictions
> are where the infraction against the public's interest can be
> compromised, but the exploitation units I'm aware of seem to
> have little of no financial interest in recognizing such a
> wanting to lose their lucrative industry brokered through what
> should be worked to be made into redundancy.]
>
> I need returned possession of my computer content, to seek for
> indicative examples of huge disparities with what is described
> with the Crown's own relative definitions, and what my media
> machine actually contains regarding my for real expressions.
> I need to reference my personal writings surmising the
> faulting state of the child **** policing industry. To
> surmise grand totals, as such the Crown's crew alleges of
> legal content she'll bemoan despairingly of collateral damages
> against us as innocence. Knock knock knock.
>
> If the Crown argues falsely that the evidence I request is
> irrelevant to her criminal case, then what could the harm be
> honestly in showing the error of her ways? If she argues it
> jeopardizes to expose the true criminality used to try
> convicting me, an innocent honorable man in Our name, I would
> move that the charge against me be stayed, my property
> returned, and the Courts help me make a Constitutional
> challenge to the validity of the law, while communicating also
> Your dissatisfaction in not having us heard speaking out
> nationally for the truly Honorable FBI - against 911's true
> money man - Lieutenant General Mahmoud Ahmad - getting away as
> bush's not so secret any longer private business partner,
> escaping he is from the mass murder of thousands of our good
> friends, the still left undefended cor****ate Americans.
>
> I need to know what settings were set in place for the
> installed programs to access the internet. And a whole bunch
> else besides.
>
> In conclusion, I need to show where my outstanding character
> was at, by indicating exactly what I spent my free time on, to
> illustrate for our Court, my TRUE intent as motive on this
> matter.
>
>
> Yours truly,
>
> JOHNNY WIZARD
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
>
>
> THE QUEEN'S BENCH
>
> WINNIPEG CENTRE
>
>
>
> NOTICE OF MOTION
>
> for the Crown to Stay Proceedings
>
>
>
> BETWEEN:
>
>
>
> HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN,
>
>
> and
>
>
> JOHNNY WIZARD
>
>
>
>
>
> Accused.
>
>
>
> The Validity of the Law
>
> While true, to distribute material in an abusive form of
> ***ually explicit child ****ography, can have a detrimental
> impact on the impressionable, being in simple possession, does
> not connotate the same negative risk to the public body. It
> is not a Freedom of Expression issue. All the pictures on my
> computer, deleted and otherwise, are not my expressions. Nor,
> im****tantly, can digital images be perceived, until, at least,
> they are already in your possession. Under current law, as is
> in my case, you're already guilty on nothing. So, if you
> should see something arguably imprisoning, you're too late to
> point fingers elsewhere.
>
> It's analogous to you sitting in your parked car with someone
> throwing through the opened window, a closed paper bag of
> crack cocaine, followed behind by an arresting police officer,
> who while cuffing you hears your plead that some completely
> unknown person threw the innocuous unmarked bag through the
> window, leaving the unjust officer of our law, to reply for
> the record "Yeah, I saw the, left to go on his own "stranger"
> do it. And it's a crime in this country don't you know to be
> found in simple possession? Now, where are the keys to the
> trunk of this fancy car I'm planning to sell for a tidy profit
> crack head loser?"
>
> The Crown appears under this law in my case to have no need to
> prove a criminal intent to do her things.
>
> See, under a simple possession charge, there is no allegations
> of intent to obtain or distribute something illegal, and
>
> likewise, not found a responsible public's interest in seeking
> the means of which the criminal content was as could be
> LEGALLY distributed. The last thing we want in our dying
> world is a setup where private legal businesses are selling,
> promoting, and releasing content that only becomes illegal
> when the exploitation unit comes into your home under false
> pretences to steal all your electronic stuff by grossly
> misunderstanding what the threat actually is.
>
> A digital image isn't possibly perceived until it is at least,
> already in your possession. Making the standing law as it is
> interpreted by the faulting Crown, unjust. No criminal intent
> is alleged by my sole possession charge, but for by myself
> against the Crown's secret bu****e crew for aiding and
> abetting the crimes of first degree mass murder in New York
> City.
>
> An infraction against the public's interest occurs when such
> materials are expressed through distribution. Digital images
> of people posing as testaments to the beauty of being human,
> are not the same as expressions of ***ually exploited
> children. Yet, from as near as I can tell, the threat of
> seriously cruel and inhuman treatment against me with a five
> year prison sentence is being made because the Crown has made
> included, condemnable interpretations of the public's free
> expressions of youth and beauty. Again, not my own. Leaving
> still no made interest in understanding where these prison
> term perceptions, that are often admitted by the Crown's crew
> to be legal, originated. If the Crown's case remains
> standing, why shouldn't we expect the child exploitation units
> to then widely distribute as near as can be Barely Legal
> materials in hopes to nab more of us as the fearful to be
> shamed as criminal through threatened public Court proceedings
> regarding your alledged deviant private ***ual thoughts? Of
> legal images perceived as a god honest, testimony of youth and
> beauty, being ourselves beautifully youthful, could leave you
> too as depicted hiding some unknown something about your
> unseen character. Or, an even worse madness, exploitation
> units distributing truly illegal depictions, named maybe after
> car models, to see who could be made found only in simple
> possession of the accusers relative perception?
>
> For, if the internationally popular woman depicted was well
> over eighteen and had her own legal website, don't matter for
> indictment, cause the expert of expert experts they have in my
> case, a double full time professional computer ****o viewer,
> states with a complete straight face, the full figured pubic
> wisped woman, he knows nothing of, is really only ten or
> twelve. You're for sure either normal being human, or guilty
> of thinking their bad thoughts punishable with real prison
> sentences. As a result of course, I'm now demanded to divorce
> my life of other critically im****tant responsibilities, to
> prove my complete innocence on these deliberately planned top
> secret schemes, they didn't want You, the public to know of.
> A near criminal attempt, (as do***ented by the now disclosed
> once top secret warrant), to silence my cries for the arrest
> of the publicly established factual 911 masterminds - Our Mr.
> bush Jr., General Ahmad, rumsfeld, myers and cheney, along
> with almost the entire senior staff of disclosed as flagrantly
> criminal propaganda proliferators, The Office of Special
> Plans.
>
> The Warrant details by exclusion, a deliberate top secret plan
> on the Crown's part, a deviant anti-government plan to silence
> my calls for accountability through my world wide public
> addresses on the FBI answers still surrounding the murder of
> thousands of American Citizens. The Crown, as an attempt to
> undermine Liberty by thwarting me off my one chosen career
> path of Universal Speaker, and fictionalized demon slayer -
> leaves you instead, this quickly passing op****tunity to stand
> up for the rights of another being cheated for real, and in so
> doing, we'll find together, that true freedom is justice for
> US all. Law stands strong for good reason, so too, does
> tyranny rule by censor****p for false imprisonment. Do not
> allow my voice for freedom's reign to be silenced unjustly, by
> those who would have us falsely believe, Bush personally
> didn't do the crimes we all easily now know the evidence of.
>
> An unjust Law enslaves all Religions, for reason is
> beautifully Just through your will to conceive, that God's
> interests are as naturally too, your own included. My
> commitments to equal rights for all have never changed, and
> Humanity's true commitment to defend Iraqi children to the
> last cowardly murderous thieving bu****e enemy, will carry on,
> despite the corrupted Crown's attempt to stop real Justice
> from continuing. When one views public photographs of
> rumsfeld's un-arrested mercenary soldiers raping an Iraqi
> woman, are our rights being further violated with every
> passing witness? How about witnessing that Guantanamo's
> torture victim Moazzam Begg, was running a girl's school
> program with his wife under the female loving Taliban? [You
> know, Moazzam Begg, the one and same British Citizen depicted
> solely by heroin pu****ng donald "***y cluster dud land mine
> dropper" rumsfeld, as one of our Lord's most dangerous
> criminals?]
>
> The Crown alleges in truly contemptuous silence, she's not
> interested in defending the rights of those children, or
> victims of mass murder, while voicing publicly in Our Court,
> that I, am infringing on the rights of children somewhere else
> because, even though no body is perceiving the data located
> anywhere on my hard drive, it still magically constitutes a
> personal violation, on its own by itself, of an unjust law
> that others have been demonized, robbed, then falsely
> imprisoned on. This irrational demand on behalf of the Crown
> to Your Court, where she states her private viewings do not
> infringe on children's rights, while EVERYONE else's does
> somehow, even if you didn't see at all the picture judged as
> the reflecting mind of a true ***ual deviant, is US ALL being
> the auto-guilty anyway, and not firstly innocent as it should
> be. See, the Judge could say to a Jury, "Your job is not to
> judge the injustice committed with these blind and broken
> laws, but that solely, did Top Cop Johnny have this one single
> picture on his computer?, and if he did, then the bu****e
> liars who fight our systems of accountability through Justice
> to further escape real rapists, torturers, and do***ented
> treasonous war criminals like those who for sure committed
> 911, get to put him in Our prison for half a decade."
>
> However this issue requires much for further study. It turns
> out my two primary accusing officers who deal with real sicko
> child **** every day full time, also sup****t death squads
> against innocent families in Afghanistan to protect the demon
> lies of George W. Bush, and they'd almost tell the jury that
> too as blind devote disciples of the self hating bushmob cabal
> of neo-con peenackers, if the Crown wasn't there to forbid the
> truth from being spoken.
>
> The two abusers, the two anti-cop officers of question, lied
> to me, then censored my agreement they had their word on,
> then, attempted to twist my comments into something clearly I
> didn't mean.. and that's not even the half of it. So, don't
> tell me I'm being over critical of their ****d wicked evil.
> If an image was an offensive act witnessed, why then is it
> that a genuine concern is not with a possible victim all the
> time? The shocker to the uninitiated in the battles of good
> against evil in these child exploitation units, is that rarely
> do they have a real monetary care to follow though with the
> details. - "Oh, the girl is really a woman, and the web
> address on the digital image is of a server acting completely
> within the confines of our law, ****ist campers are ****ist
> campers, and as for the beautifully ****d young girl taking a
> bubble bath smiling, er.. I mean the one looking seductive...
> drat." Examples: I have many texts willfully ignored by the
> Crown that articulate irrational praise for one heinous crime
> against God or another of the un-elected neocon war wankers,
> that I, as a human, certainly don't find myself in automatic,
> no free thought agreement with., right? And my objective as
> Human defender isn't to censor the known criminality of the,
> murder innocent people for the war profiting bushmob liars,
> but to expose the true injustice committed against our better
> selves - US all dying slavishly censored through Our cor****ate
> international communication network of good old ideas left
> long gone dead and buried. Hammurabi's Code of Law: it's
> first sentence, of his first paragraph, the number one most
> im****tant Law as example. - Here's the translation - The
> public figure blaming someone else for a capital offense, such
> as terrorist, who uses NO EVIDENCE for PROOF, to murder in
> Your name as Citizen, is the FOR SURE ENEMY, always, EVERY
> TIME. And in the next four thousand years that single law has
> timelessly stood unbroken, not one person has been capable to
> declare a true, wanting disagreement.
>
> The cor****ate news mandate is to take You for granted -
> without any given say so. Our sold as sworn public defenders,
> CBC, CNN, et al, hold no opinions of our Humanity on the
> needless indiscriminate bombing of populated cities, the
> torturing of men women and children by un-arrested as openly
> confessed complete psychotics, the thieving of hundreds of
> billions from America and Iraq, and as such, tyrannically
> sup****t [don't call us, will call you] commi censor****p, all
> done in to assist the "escape" of those truly responsible for
> the crimes of 911.
>
> When the Crown argues that disturbing images simply in your
> possession constitute an absolute evaluation of your
> punishable character, while denying\forbidding a Court to know
> what you do in your life with our time is faulted. I hold
> children's rights paramount in the public defense stands I've
> made for near a decade, and privately, I'm free to think my
> way on anything. The Crown has no right to dictate what my
> private thoughts are. This insistence on behalf of the Crown
> on what we all perceive individually by judgment is determined
> solely by media content - is a foolish falsehood forwarded by
> Our Great Lord's, Supreme Court of Canada. Example: Does not
> the public videos of rumsfeld's, defended from YOUR LAW
> bu****e soldiers, gunning down women and children running for
> their lives from a mosque, or where hundreds of unarmed
> defenseless families are huddled together, then bombed by a
> bu****e enemy grunt, a grunt who on VIDEO TAPE, moans itself
> to orgasm when they all die as the innocent murdered with
> "ah.. dude" just speak for itself? Sure, the celebrating
> bu****es repeatedly depicted have no honor, or courage, only a
> fascistic hatred for their fellow man - openly thieves who die
> without a fighting cause for Freedom, nor a true commitment to
> Law - but I would ask if We had a voice to cry in Your Court,
> what do You see in this cor****ate World that leaves my stand
> professionally unworthy for deliberations? The Crown's
> concern remains silent on the DO***ENTED and easily verifiable
> murder issues, when she has her regular huddles with a local
> cor****ate re****ter, discussing on who, from the community, was
> in Our court challenging, a ***ually dysfunctional
> sadomasochistic label. For the Crown to witness and know
> first hand of such barbaric criminality, such as the true
> perpetrators of 9/11 found revealed by THE FBI stinger, along
> with the rest of the evidence trail that all leads directly to
> the Whitehouse, is a Crown who does not hold Canadian's
> freedom in check, or a care for our soldier aged sons and
> daughters conflicting near death. But to side instead, as
> they are hiding behind the honorable Crown's position, a small
> group of four or five dim blips, attempting they are to
> silence these calls for real freedom for the m*****. I am a
> proud and honorable man who objects to furthering bush's war
> crime aims with this lifeless cor****ate tyranny of enslavement
> through whoring for the dark foreboding wills of Our Mr. bush
> Jr.. Censor****p is the tool of tyrants, while I beckon a new
> light for peace by communicating. Please, I beg you, do not
> allow them to silence my objections to have us unjustly
> imprisoning myself, while bringing great hard****p to my
> immediate family by denying the truth be spoken publicly in my
> defense on why I'm in the Court room, and what is do***ented
> irrespective of their spin doctoring and label pasting.
>
> Where is the violation of a child's rights, specifically, when
> the Crown's crew gleefully ponder images she'll use to silence
> the words of Johnny Wizard by prison sentence? Where? No,
> where?
>
> Commanding our public indignation for those who disrespect
> human rights she will use as her weapon, all the while, hidden
> from the jury, and the judge, a secret contempt for thousands
> of innocent murder victims denied my unchallenged demands for
> real Justice. No officer of our laws anywhere have found
> fault with my PUBLIC summation, do***ented fully, on who, and
> how, 9/11 was truly orchestrated. A Crown stuck committed to
>
> global bu****e tyranny Vs. a Truth seeker of the highest
> order. Come to the trial! Tell your friends! Tell your
> neighbors! The People vs. an overburdened unjust Crown, and
> a near treasonous national security officer, who wrote in the
> original top secret warrant nobody was suppose to see, it'd be
> so much easier to help bush escape arrest by avoiding the
> public accountability process entirely. The once top secret
> Johnny Wizard Warrant is freely available with most names
> being detracted, to protect the innocent until proven guilty.
> A traitor to God and Country the Crown and one National
> Security officer potentially is in this top secret bush
> administration conspiracy endeavor, to serve by bu****e
> criminal decree up here in defenseless Canada. For as
> potential accessories to first degree mass murder, they are
> stuck attempting to undermine Canada's National Security
> Services, the FBI, the People, US, all to further unjustly
> sacrifice, more of our uninformed sons and daughters for
> further bounty, as substantiated real world criminal, bu****e
> evils. I say no. Help me get public recognition through talk
> radio, take a stand for your fellow man, and help a Jury in
> Winnipeg learn of who I am, and why they are forbidden to know
> what's truly going on, and you'll be helping yourself to a
> better future. My principle allegations against George W.
> Bush require a qualified and adapt security officer no more
> that forty three minutes to verify. Namely, bush's business
> partner, General Ahmad funded 911's "mastermind" "ringleader"
> Atta, and was also sent, the General was, from the Whitehouse
> on behalf of bush to the Taliban stating, no evidence will be
> brought against Laden as the accused, therefore an innocent
> man in Christ. And, that as MSNBC re****ted of the top secret
> do***ents provided to themselves anonymously from Condoleezza
> Rice's office, George had a confidential plan at his desk on
> how to invade Afghanistan dated September 9th, 2001 that he
> didn't want anybody in America to know he was working on
> during his "vacation". His confessed publicly to MSNBC, as
> "fully implemented" Afghanistan strategy, demanded that he not
> pursue the true 911 evil doers, for it would upset his made
> before hand, guaranteed plan. That had soldier grunts moving
> out to get ready just before the event. All premised on
> blaming Laden as a terrorist without a shred of evidence, for
> a crime that hadn't yet taken place, but that bush was
> personally prepared as closing investigations on. To secure
> criminal invasion he would refuse to follow the evidence trail
> - and as a result - NOT apprehend the have to let go - falsely
> accused bin Laden. [cowardly soldiers who didn't speak up as
> real Patriots would have much earlier, who were ordered to let
> Laden go on his way in Torra Borra, have now all mostly fallen
> quietly dead., by fluke mishap or something like the sort it
> is said.] All set in play, this plan of Our Mr. bush Jr's,
> top secretly with General Ahmad riding gun shot, just days
> before thousands of American People were still left
> unaccountably murdered. See? Mr. Bush would need such an
> event to happen unhindered as a requirement to galvanize world
> sentiment. Providing no evidence substantiated would
> guarantee his needed invasion for American pension thievers
> Enron, and that is exactly what HE planned, what HE did, and
> who HE is. Evil is the deceived disguised. What more do you
> need to know buddy?
>
> I, armed with only the facts, demand the arrest of those who
> participated in the murder of children to protect the demon
> lies of George W. Bush, while the Crown's case, on top of
> alleging that the simple possession Law [no criminal intent to
> express or obtain is alleged] states a child's rights are
> being infringed on due to the content by itself, ALONE,
> appears ready to fight for disallowing a jury, to freely
> witness, this fi****ng expedition was intentionally started to
> stop me speaking my outrage that bush hasn't been yet arrested
> for committing 9/11 with General Ahmad, so according to the
> unmentionables in the no longer top secret Warrant. That this
> Crown would officially state holding our virtues while
> attempting to condemn me to a long prison sentence, shows her
> possible personal true contempt for the value of Your human
>
> life my friend. I have written extensively on defending the
> rights of children, and the psychology of ***ually
> dysfunctional sadomasochists, I have studied this world to
> create some thing greater than average, some thing better than
> normal, a world where all children are respected, including
> those of Iraq who have been purposefully denied safe drinking
> water, because negroponte needed to STEAL the emergency funds
> for his new embassy. See?, she would argue that those real
> world crimes aren't relevant to my case in her hands, those
> REAL children like perhaps your own don't concern her, nor do
> the lives of Canadians lied to by cor****ate command for
> criminal sacrifice. The Crown convinces us irrationally, with
> her only excuse being, because the specific broken Law she's
> decided to singly exercise, (with the exclusion of all others,
> like thou shall not murder,) stupidly says she can, and you
> dummies can't do anything at all about it yourself. Why?
> Because you wont speak out for anyone else's rights to be
> heard publicly - the bu****e enemy trust to figure. Justice
> is Freedom, and to have a real concern for another's lost
> rights to freely be, is to be truly concerned with your very
> own in serious jeopardy. I wouldn't lie to you. Believing,
> as the bu****e do, willfully deceitful cor****ate news
> propaganda excuses the Bush Administration's rampant
> criminality against the innocent as God is, truly, excuses
> nothing, especially if I have something to say on the subject
> of accountability.
>
> This final Court challenge against my Freedom to be myself,
> that the bush administration attempted firstly to do top
> secretly, has now been laid publicly at our door step as a
> blatant threat to everyone of us as a member of the Canadian
> Public. Will you help me politely address my false accusers
> on our public airwaves? Will you help speak for freedom from
> tyranny is this question riddled, or will you deny yourself my
> generous helping?
>
> The reasons why such abhorrent behaviors continue unaddressed
> in our Police Force actions will be do***ented fully with
> remedies offered during the second part of the third phase of
> the upcoming Question Period press conferences - press
> conferences running during the available down times of The
> Trial of
>
> JOHNNY WIZARD
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------
>
>
> / /And that of course gives the bu****es and CBC and CNN their
> implausible deniability, where they can say their remaining
> neutral, by not providing us the facts to allow us to decide
> for ourselves. Because otherwise, we wouldn't kill ourselves
> to profit the bushmob cabal of God haters. Who victimize
> innocent Christians for no other reason but for to profit off
> our suffering.
>
> [...]
>
> Think of all those people in that situation as God. And
> these, the bu****e nazi grunts, have positions that are
> completely irrational, they're making no sense, your fuking
> up. It's like a cancer that God of that whole situation, is
> inflicted with. They're lying to themselves. If your there
> to fight on behalf of Iraqis, you take a position to demand
> all the money that has been taken through this Iraq
> Development Fund, be returned. \ \
>
>
> --
>
>
> / / What is particularly disturbing is how the administration
> misused intelligence information to make its case for war and
> failed to plan competently for the postwar period. \ \
>
> What seems even more disturbing, to me, and PBS' FRONTLINE, is
> that there was a "State" plan, the ORHA plan to prevent
> looting and carnage, but it was sabotaged by rumsfeld and
> franks, so the bushmob could try to make some sense of
> needlessly bombing the country for our labored dollars, while
> robbing the central bank and museum by mopping up the mess
> with the bodies of American Patriots still dying as dumfuks.
>
>
>
> -----------------
>
> you know what is right, though you may still be blind, never too
> late to
> change your mind, we are all in agreement, in truth we rise, evil is
> just the
> deceived disguised...
>
>
> STAND TOGETHER, OR DON'T
>
> Our Gambling Problem
>
>
> Instead of our government deciding what services we need and are
> willing to
> pay for, they'll have us think that by actively promoting gambling to
> those we
> can take advantage of, somehow serves them right, and us well.
>
> SNPD
>
> ------
>
> HERO
>
> http://houston.indymedia.org/uploads/hero.mp3
> http://arizona.indymedia.org/uploads/hero.mp3
>
> / / That is a high act of treason. And it's not,
>
> "oh well, but maybe it's not true.." No, we have
> the two do***ents of question. \ \
>
>
>
>
> What is the Coast to Coast radio network Head talking
> about tonight?, the re-re-re-ha****ng of the "Allaways
> Interslinging" Bigfoot phenomenon? Where was I...
>
> Look, you're not going to go to hell for not giving me a
> couple of dollars to further my cause, but it sure
> couldn't help to leave me without any sup****t here
> whatsoever.
>
>
>
> --
>
> White House keeps dossiers on more than 10,000 'political enemies'
>
> http://www.capitolhillblue.com/artman/publish/article_7625.shtml
>
> ---
>
> The United States of America v. Adam Vaughn
> http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/10.10/kid****.html
>
> He was a stand-up Marine, a beloved cop, and a local hero
>
> / / Vaughn was accused of possessing child ****ography on
> the basis of images in his browser cache and downloaded
> photos he had deleted from his hard drive long before the
> accusations. Although Vaughn says he never sought out or
> wanted to keep ****ographic images of children, he's
> serving four and a half years in jail. \ \
>
> --
>
> http://ww.alternet.org/columnists/story/15407/
>
> / / It's as if our government is telling us that if we're
> going to look at ****, we'd better pay for it. Otherwise,
> we might get branded pedophiles. How many innocent lives
> will be destroyed before the child **** wars are over? \ \
>
>
> ---
>
>
> WHICH SIDE ARE YOU ON?
>
> / / Specialist Damien "Monster" Corsetti--known
> affectionately as the "King of Torture" among his Bagram
> colleagues--was later fined and demoted for forcing an
> Iraqi woman to strip during an interrogation at Abu
> Ghraib. Yet Corsetti remains a free man. \ \
>
>
> Will America hunt to kill the un-arrested bu****e cancer
> that knows thyself as the "King of Torture"? Who's
> blasphemous open contempt for all that is God doesn't even
> earn him a spot on America's Most Wanted?
>
> / / "Suggestions that U.S. forces targeted civilians with
> these weapons are simply wrong," U.S. Marine Major Tim
> Keefe said in an e-mail to Reuters. "Had the producers of
> the do***entary bothered to ask us for comment, we would
> have certainly told them that the premise of the program
> was erroneous." \ \
>
>
> Does not such treasonous conduct warrant a military
> misdemeanor of bush ***** Tim Keefe? He even claims to
> have knowledge of the undisputable endless footage
> that do***ents nazi attacks against the completely
> innocent as defenseless. But the premise of a commitment
> for Americans to truly war Our enemies being the truly
> Just and Free, at least under his falsehoods of
> leader****p, is an erroneous argument. For, bu****es are
> the bad guys, who lie cheat and steal don't you know.
>
>
> ---
>
> / / Bush didn't have any popularity left. Overnight tracking
> polls showed Kilgore dropped three percentage points after the
> President's appearance and Democrat Tim Kaine won on Tuesday.
>
> Conservative Pennsylvania Republican Senator Rick Santorum
>
> told radio talk show host Don Imus Wednesday that he does not
> want the President's help and will stay away from a Bush rally
> in his state on Friday. \ \
>
> -------------
>
>
>
http://houston.indymedia.org/uploads/bush_not_concerned_about_laden_walking_aw
> ay
> .wmv
>
>
> --
>
> http://houston.indymedia.org/uploads/another-lob.mp3
>
> / / Why would God promise you in the Bible, go hurt myself
> purposefully. And steal something from someone you didn't
> earn. And be a dishonest lying bastard, just to be an
> asshole you like to be. \ \
>
> --
>
> http://houston.indymedia.org/uploads/somebody16.mp3
>
> / / He figured anybody who committed the acts of torture
> against the innocent, needed to be publicly executed for
> America, by America, as America, and I, am totally in
> agreement with that. \ \
>
> --
>
> Bush Jnr. is sure wicked evil song
>
>
http://houston.indymedia.org/uploads/bush_jnr._is_sure_wicked_evil_song.mp3
>
> --
>
> http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article10785.htm
>
> / / an epic study that do***ents the systematic nature of
> torture by the Americans, and how casual it is, even
> enjoyable. [...] as the head of Reuters said recently,
> it is out of control. It is destroying lives in industrial
> quantities when compared with the violence of the
> resistance. \ \
>
> Godless bu****e enemy thieves, are enemies of innocent men
> women and children as they live and die in undefended America
> measured worthless to the neocon traitor's bottom line.
>
> If YOU, personally make no effort to confront millionaire talk
> radio hosts who insist America's more concerned with
> discussing the im****tance of aliens and vampires than the
> sacrifice of liberty for tyranny, America will die. Anti-cop
> Coast to Coast hosts deliberately forbid Americans to learn
> about who personally is responsible for the crimes of 911, or
> that the war in Iraq has no rational justification whatsoever.
> Nazi bush ***** George Norrie would happily watch your
> American children die for the treasonous bushmob, before
> allowing any Patriot on Your radio to discuss these serious
> matters that confront us all. Help me gain a public voice on
> our air waves, please.
>
> http://www.wa****ngtonpost.com/wp-
> dyn/content/article/2005/10/25/AR2005102501388.html
>
> / / Mr Cheney told several Republican senators that
> President Bush would veto the annual defense spending
> bill if it contained language prohibiting the use of
> cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment by any U.S.
> personnel. \ \
>
> http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article10362.htm
>
> / / Col. Robert Bowman: As other speakers have said,
> they knew the American people wouldn't stand for it, and
> they said so in their do***ents, and they said, unless
> there's that new Pearl Harbor.
>
> [...] and it is treason. [...]
>
> 1. We give up all rights to Iraqi oil 2. We give up
> all rights to the rebuilding contracts- if Halliburton
> wants a contract from you, they have to bid on it like
> anybody else, and they have to hire Iraqis to do the work
> for a change. 3. We give up all rights to those 14
> permanent military bases we're building in Iraq at this
> time. And the people in the Whitehouse are not going to
> make those committments and so they have to go and all
> the puppeteers with them. \ \
>
> / / Rove told Cooper that further information
> discrediting Wilson and his findings would soon be
> declassified and ended the phone conversation by saying
> "I've already said too much. \ \
>
> / / · less than one per cent of the population believes
> coalition forces are responsible for any improvement in
> security; \ \
>
>
>
>
> (Don't miss "Johnny Wizard Vs. the bushmob")
> http://mailgate.supereva.com/soc/soc.culture.pakistan.politics/
>
> (on bush's behavior during the school book 9/11 incident.)
>
> / / Stuck he was then, with no mind to ruse, er.. time to
> snooze, Arg! What was the cue? Errrch... If he moves
> with priority interest as concerned openly honest public
> figure, as he knows a legitimate President would have
> been to first learn of such carnage,
>
> THE MONTH BEFORE IN AUGUST,
>
> why not previous before he left his Hotel room with a
> television? Outside the Hotel? In the motorcade? With
> school staff as you'd figure would have been present too
> laughing, no? Instead he stayed as he had been to give
> no orders publicly, nor attempt to make public inqiries,
> but to listen with such unbelievable absolute devotion,
> equating a beautiful child's story, as if it were Jesus
> from the heavens himself, speaking directly on the
> living Nature of our Universe.. \ \
>
>
> >From the Johnny Wizard work - "Wait a Moment"
>
> [The Son of Man asks:]
>
> / / Who cares about yourself if you won't listen as reason
> to? What can you lose when you have granted to be
> blindly stolen from? \ \
>
> -
>
> / / An editorial appearing Wednesday in the Wa****ngton
> Post did not mince words in denouncing Cheney's
> intervention. His actions, the newspaper declared,
> demonstrated that ``this vice president has become an
> open advocate of torture.'' \ \
>
> / / The War Crimes Act of 1996, a federal statute set
> forth at 18 U.S.C. § 2441, makes it a federal crime for
> any U.S. national, whether military or civilian, to
> violate the Geneva Convention by engaging in murder,
> torture, or inhuman treatment. \ \
>
> / / Making a potential prosecutor's job easier, U.S.
> Attorney General Alberto Gonzales wrote a memo in January
> 2002 to President Bush saying that America should opt out
> of the Geneva Convention because top officials have to
> worry about prosecutions under 18 U.S.C. § 2441. By
> attempting to sidestep the Geneva Convention, Gonzales
> created a do***ent trail that can be used to prove that
> top administration officials knowingly created a policy
> of torturing prisoners \ \
>
> / / Entitled ``The Torture Question,'' the re****t makes
> clear that Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld bears direct
> responsibility for the brutal methods of interrogation
> used against US prisoners. \ \
>
> --
>
> http://www.cageprisoners.com/articles.php?id=10136
>
> / / What is happening is that Ms. Davidson and Lawyers Against the
> War have laid charges against George Bush Jr; accusing him of
> aiding, abetting, and counseling the commission of torture. \ \
>
> / / "Many Canadians don't realize that we have not only the right
> but the responsibility to pursue these charges, it is a
> responsibility that the Canadian government owes not only to the
> people of Canada, but to the people of the world. \ \
>
> / / "The American legal system seems incapable of bringing him to
> justice and there are no international courts with jurisdiction.
> So it's up to Canada to enforce the law that everybody has signed
> on to but nobody else seems willing to apply." \ \
>
> / / Irwin Cotler's credo is supposed to be "Justice, justice shall
> you pursue" not ingratiation with superpowers who practice torture. \
> \
>
>
> ---
>
> / / [...] talk your arguments to 18 USC 794 anti-treason law.
> and if he [bush] goes by hanging I buy the rope. \ \
>
> --
>
> / / o Where the HE |
