Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Alternative > Black Helicopters > IS THE C.I.A. A...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 1 of 2 Topic 275 of 296
Post > Topic >>

IS THE C.I.A. AMERICA'S FRIEND?

by Robert LaCasse <para@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Dec 3, 2007 at 01:09 PM

From: Ed B.
Date: Sat, 01 Dec 2007 23:02:41 -0600

http://www.newswith
views.com/ Stuter/stuter114 .htm
IS THE C.I.A. AMERICA'S FRIEND? By Lynn Stuter
November 27, 2007 NewsWithViews. com

A nationwide news agency, supposedly of the conservative persuasion,
recently
sent out an e-gram containing items for sale loosely commemorating
patriotism
and the "holiday season." Tucked amidst the offerings of DVD's of John
Wayne's tribute to America and Cecil B DeMille's epic classic, The Ten
Commandments, Brynner and Charlton Heston, was an ad for a CIA cap,
stating, 

"The Central Intelligence Agency is known as one of the world's most
secretive and effective government agencies. You can stand with the men
and
women of the Central Intelligence Agency &shy; an im****tant force in the
war
against terror &shy; by proudly wearing the CIA cap." 

First of all, the so-called War on Terror isn't a war on terror at all,
it's
a war on the Constitution and Bill of Rights; a war on the rights of the
American people. The War on Terror is like the War on Drugs and the War on
Poverty; in each case the targeted problem got worse instead of better:
the
War on Drugs brought more drugs into the United States; the War on Poverty
increased poverty. In each case, however, federal bureaucracies were
spawned
that managed to gobble up more and more tax dollars, gain more and more
power, while whining that more money would surely cure the problem. Just
like
more money won't cure the woes of a failing federal education bureaucracy,
more money will not cure any problem in which the government has taken a
role. More money to the federal government simply means more bureaucracy,
a
concept understood by our Founding Fathers but lost on the American people
today who continue to hold out hope that things will get better if they
just
give more money, when consistently the opposite has been proven the case.
One
would think that after a while the American people would catch on that
paying
more money into a black hole nets the American people nothing but more
grief.
While holding out hope, the American people seem addicted to the
self-destructive concept that more money will cure ills. 

Now we have the War on Terror which has already cost the American
taxpayers
an estimated $610.5 billon ($610,500,000, 000); established a huge federal
bureaucracy called the Department of Homeland Security [1]; and further
infringed on the rights of the American people through 

1. suspension of habeas corpus prohibiting the arrest and incarceration of
people without due process&shy; charges being specified, reasonable bail,
op****tunity to defend, and presumption of innocence; 
2. posse Comitatus prohibiting the use of the American military against
the
American people on American soil; 
3. revoking of the Fourth Amendment prohibiting illegal search and
seizure;
illegal data mining of bank records, e-mails and phone calls; 
4. defining dissidents as domestic terrorists (a sure sign of tyranny); HR
1995&shy;the Violent Radicalization and Homegrown Terrorism Prevention Act
of
2007; 
5. requiring Americans to have National ID's (your papers to be presented
on
demand whenever and wherever demanded); and 
6. giving to the executive branch of the U.S. government those tools
sought
to impose martial law at the whim of the president. 
All in the name of fighting a nebulous, loosely-defined group of unknowns
with no apparent faces, features or characteristics, called "terrorists."
Not
even Osama bin Laden who, immediately following September 11, 2001, was at
the top of the list of "wanted"; but who, after Bush got his invasion of
Afghanistan and Iraq, was suddenly no longer im****tant and no longer
hunted.
The conundrums only get worse. 
For all this, has terrorism decreased? No, it hasn't. And no, it won't.
But
the threat of people blowing up, cars blowing up, planes blowing up,
buildings mysteriously imploding into their footprints, bridges
collapsing,
shopping malls, coliseums and s****ts arenas being blown up, ad infinitum,
ad
nauseam, is continually being dangled as a possibility before the American
people, complete with graphic pictures of the same occurring elsewhere, to
extort more money and more rights from them.[2] And the American people
are
buying it, hook, line, and sinker. 
At the same time, we have not seen one meaningful measure taken to staunch
the flow of illegal aliens crossing the borders, north and south, of the
United States. Included in that flow &shy; to the tune of 12 to 20,000,000
illegal aliens &shy; are terrorists, rapists, murderers, sodomites, drug
dealers, human traffickers, drunks, dope addicts, and many other of the
criminal element beyond the fact that every illegal alien becomes a
criminal
the moment he/she sets foot in this country without the required
permission
and do***ents to do so. On average, at least 25 Americans are killed each
day
by illegal aliens on American soil. Materials needed to build IEDs have
shown
up in Texas; prayer rugs and terrorist clothing have shown up in the
deserts
of the Southwest known to be routes of ingress for illegal aliens. 

Yet we have the Bush Administration bragging that the War on Terror has
been
so successful that we've not been attacked since September 11, 2001. Of
course, who was truly responsible for the attacks on the World Trade
Center
and Pentagon on September 11, 2001, has never been proven. What we have is
an
official government story that is so full of holes, so riddled with
cover-ups, inconsistencies, improbabilities and impossibilities, denials
of
access, refusals to disclose, and secrecy that only a fool would believe
the
Bush Administration and government didn't have something to hide. And the
staged 9/11 Commission and its resulting re****t only makes the government
cover-up more apparent. 

Then, too, we have media hacks like Glenn Beck contending that those
seeking
the truth about the events of September 11, 2001, are "idiots" who think
the
United States government "capable" of pulling off the events of September
11,
2001 without it ending up "front page of the New York Times." If Beck
truly
believes this about the government, just how could he possibly imagine the
same was not true if this was the foreign born plot of terrorists who
delight
in taking immediate responsibility for their actions, the limp and
unsubstantiated supposed claim of al Qaeda long after the fact (October
2004)
notwithstanding? 

But all of this could lead one to another conclusion: the reason there
have
been no further attacks on America is that the attacks that have occurred
have occurred to bring about the wanted solution &shy; to bring the
American
people, who would not sup****t a War on Terror otherwise, to sup****t the
Bush
Administration' s invasion of Afghanistan and Iraq. Time and again, the
Hegelian Dialectic has been used to move the American people to accept
something they would not otherwise accept. Who can forget the Project for
a
New American Century do***ent, Rebuilding America's Defenses: Strategy,
Forces and Resources For a New Century in which the need for a "new Pearl
Harbor" is advocated? Who can forget the laundry list of Bush
Administration
officials whose names are indelibly connected to that do***ent: Dick
Cheney,
Eliot A. Cohen, Paula Dobriansky, Aaron Friedberg, Francis Fukuyama,
Zalmay
Khalilzad, Lewis "Scooter" Libby, Norman Podhoretz, Peter W Rodman, Henry
S.
Rowan, Donald
Rumsfeld, Vin Weber, and Paul Wolfowitz? Did these people have motive? Did
they have means? Did they have op****tunity? 
Following this train of thought, further terrorist attacks would only
become
necessary if the American people needed further encouragement to jump on,
or
stay on, the imperial expansionist band wagon. Consider that when Bush got
his troop surge in Iraq, the terrorist threat suddenly disappeared; and
apparently, so did Chertoff's gut feelings prominently aired and promoted
leading up to that troop surge. How many times does this scenario have to
be
repeated before the American people catch on? 
The ad above describes the CIA as "one of the world's most secretive and
effective government agencies." While the name, Central Intelligence
Agency,
implies this agency is about the gathering and analyzing of intelligence,
that is an assumption in large part. Why is the CIA secretive? While most
would be quick to respond "for reasons of national security," do the
following fall in the realm of national security? 

1. Bringing Nazi war criminals into the United States (Operation
Paperclip). 
2. Infiltrating the mainstream media, funding mainstream media, and
establi****ng mainstream media outlets for purposes of propaganda
(Operation
Mockingbird) . 
3. Funding and running mind control programs &shy; using American men,
women
and children in mind control experiments no less heinous than those
performed
by Nazis on concentration camp prisoners (MK-Ultra, MK-Naomi, MK-Delta,
MK-Action, Artichoke, Bluebird, Pandora, and others). 
4. Engaging in child prostitution, ****ography and pedophilia, within the
United States and abroad (Finders, MK/Ultra, Franklin Cover-up, Wa****ngton
call-boy scandal, and others). 
5. Funding the Esalen Institute of California &shy; sending people from
that
institute to be instructed by Nazi fugitives living in Chile, the theories
of
behavior modification emanating from Esalen then being taught to teachers
in
colleges and universities across the United States to be used on children
in
classrooms.[ 3] 
6. Funding CIA covert operations by im****ting and selling vast quantities
of
drugs on the streets of the United States of America (Iran-Contra for
example). 

There is no question that the CIA has been effective. The question is,
effective at what? At furthering freedom, liberty and justice as the
American
people have been led to believe? Or has the CIA been effective in
destroying
America as it has destroyed other nations in the name of "national
security"?
Was the CIA behind the assassination of John Fitzgerald Kennedy? Evidence
now
coming to light suggests more than a scant probability that such is the
case
[4]; especially in light of the flawed Warren Commission re****t. 

Attempts to view the budget of the CIA, to surveil the scope of operations
of
the CIA, have been continually thwarted and denied. The budget of the CIA
exists in a black hole of secrecy that even Congressman have no access to.
The CIA is accountable to no one; their operations cloaked under the guise
of
"national security" and kept away from the eyes of the American people and
Congress until declassified years later, if then. 

It is beyond comprehension that the majority of the American people would
sup****t the work of the CIA, knowing what they have been and are involved
in
that is so detrimental to the best interests of the people of the United
States, so depraved in purpose and construct. It is beyond comprehension
that
the American people could believe that the work of a rogue agency is not
being used on the American people as it has been used on the people of
other
nations. CIA involvement in the Franklin cover-up and Wa****ngton call-boy
scandal is but one instance of this rogue agencies actions. 

It is long past time the light of exposure and truth be ****ned upon the
CIA,
the depth and extent of its operations laid bare for the American people
to
see. When an agency must exist within a total vacuum of secrecy, such is
not
in the best interests, ever, of the people it pur****ts to serve. What is
coming to light now, after years of CIA operations in the United States
and
abroad, proves that. 

Wear a CIA cap proudly proclaiming sup****t for the CIA? Not in a million
years! 

Footnotes: 
1, It is of interest, and should be of interest to the American people,
that
under Hitler, Germany was constantly and continuously referred to as "the
homeland" just as Homeland Security Chief Michael Chertoff refers to the
United States as "the homeland" every time he opens his mouth. 
2, And lest some one think an attempt is being made to denigrate the lives
lost in such fa****on, such is definitely not true. What is true is that
the
perpetrators are not necessarily those appearing, with repetition, on
television screens nation-wide. 
3, Early leaders at Esalen Institute include B.F. Skinner, Abraham Maslow,
and Carl Rogers, all involved in humanist psychology; their behavior
modification theories and techniques incor****ated in teacher curriculums
taught in colleges and universities across the United States. B.F. Skinner
is
best known for his operant conditioning techniques of how to train a
child,
not educate a child. Abraham Maslow is considered the founder of Third
Force
Psychology. Carl Rogers is considered the father of the "human potential
movement" (HPM), the concepts of which are taught in teacher curriculums
in
colleges and universities nation-wide and touted by New Age guru's like
Jack
Canfield who, in his self esteem curriculum for schools, 101 Ways to
Develop
Student Self-Esteem and Responsibility, Vol I, sup****ts teachers putting
children in "altered states of consciousness" &shy; a hypnotic state used
in
mind control in which the mind becomes highly susceptible to suggestion.
(For
more on
this click here; in the left lower column, click on " New Age Religious
Practices in the Classroom,") 
4, E Howard Hunt, in a death-bed confession to his son, stated the CIA was
behind, was involved in the assassination. Other evidence coming to light
sup****ts this confession. 
Outside Sources: 
1, Constantine, Alex; Virtual Government; CIA Mind Control Operations in
America; Feral House; Los Angeles, CA; 1997. 
2, Kwitny, Jonathan; The Crimes of Patriots; A True Tale of Dope, Dirty
Money, and the CIA; W W Norton & Company, Inc; New York, NY; 1987. 
3, Roberts, Craig; The Medusa File; Consolidated Press International;
Tulsa,
OK; 1997. 
4, Trento, Joseph J.; The Secret History of the CIA; Carroll and Graf
Publishers; New York, NY; 2001. 
© 2007 Lynn M. Stuter - All Rights Reserved 
Sign Up For Free E-Mail Alerts 

Mother and wife, Stuter has spent the past fifteen years researching
systems
theory with a particular emphasis on education. She home schooled two
daughters, now grown and on their own. She has worked with legislators,
both
state and federal, on issues pertaining to systems governance and
education
reform. She networks nationwide with other researchers and citizens
concerned
with the transformation of our nation. She has traveled the United States
and
lived overseas. 
Web site: www. learn-usa. com 
E-Mail: lmstuter@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 usa.com 
-- 
Triad Productions-Fantalla®~EZine~ParaNovel
National Association of Assault Research
(http://boblacasse.150m.com/htmlconc
.html)
 




 2 Posts in Topic:
IS THE C.I.A. AMERICA'S FRIEND?
Robert LaCasse <para@[  2007-12-03 13:09:39 
Re: IS THE C.I.A. AMERICA'S FRIEND?
"BogusID" <B  2007-12-04 03:39:25 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Thu Jul 24 14:43:35 CDT 2008.