Back by popular demand - the 45 Questions that terrify those who try to
defend
the Warren Commission Re****t. In the past, there have been only two
semi-serious attempts to answer them, one by John McAdams, and one by
'Bud' (the
troll listed below) - Both responses were basically denials of the facts
in most
of the 'answers'.
But first, an im****tant note:
**********************************************************************
Im****tant Note for Lurkers - there are many trolls on this forum who's
only purpose is to obstruct debate, deny the evidence, and attempt to
change message threads from discussing the evidence, to personal insults
and attacks.
These trolls include (but are not limited to):
Baldoni
Bigdog
Bill
Brokedad
Bud
Burlyguard
Cdddraftsman
Chuck Schuyler
Chucks@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Von Pein
Ed Dolan *
Justme1952
Martybaughman@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Rita
mucher1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Brown
Spiffy_one
Timstter@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
W. Vaughan
YoHarvey
Please beware when seeing their responses, and note that they will simply
deny the facts I mention, demand citations that I've provided before, or
simply run with insults. These trolls are only good material for the kill
files.
* Eddie 'Disgrace' Dolan is an exception - he *should* be killfiled, but
he's
amusing! And being a former Marine, even a disgraced one, is a plus.
**********************************************************************
12. "Tests were also made with a nuclear reactor on the cast of Oswald's
cheek
Dr. Vincent P. Guinn, head of the activation analysis program of the
general
atomic division of General Dynamics Cor****ation, made an analysis of the
paraffin cast, the results of which were presented to the Commission. Dr.
Guinn
said that he hand his colleagues reasoned 'that if a gun was fired and
some of
the powder came back on the hands and cheek, some of the bullet primer
should
also come back'. They decided to try looking for elements by putting the
wax
impressions of hands and cheeks into a nuclear reactor.' Guinn said the
had
informed the FBI that it would be worth-while to utilize 'activation
analysis'
because the Dallas police had merely used the chemical paraffin test.
'We bought a similar rifle from the same shop as Oswald and conducted two
parallel tests,' Guinn said. 'One person fired the rifle on eight
occasions.'
The scientist stated that paraffin casts were made and when tested by
means of
radioactivity, 'it was positive in all eight cases and showed a primer on
both
hands and both cheeks. [Weisberg, who has seen Guinn's re****t, quotes
"heavy
deposits" on the cheek casts] Then we took the casts of Oswald's cheek and
put
them in a nuclear reactor.' Guinn added, 'I cannot say what we found out
about
Oswald because it is secret until the publication of the Warren Commission
Re****t." - Mark Lane's Rush to Judgment, pg 152-153
These comparative tests, which were done by a recognized expert - were
contradicted by Cunningham's testimony on pg 561 of the WCR (despite the
fact
that Cunningham had *NO* experience with NAA) - but the Warren Commission
was
not honest enough to present Guinn's evidence... This evidence is
*exculpatory*
for Oswald...
Why was the WC dishonest enough to present Cunningham's testimony, without
allowing readers to know about Guinn's testing results?
Why were those test results of firing a rifle at Oak Ridge buried, and are
still
denied by most LNT'ers today?
|
