In article
<1c0ebbab-5bda-4f8b-9459-c201f96eaed5@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
aeffects says...
>
>On May 12, 10:55 am, Chuck Schuyler <chu...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> On May 12, 9:00 am, Ben Holmes <ad...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>
>> {Edited for clarity}
>>
>> > 28. LNT'ers get really nervous and never seem to have any explanation
>> > for the re****ted Limo slowdown/stop that took place in Dealey Plaza.
>> > Why is a slowdown *NOT SEEN IN THE EXTANT Z-FILM TO THE CASUAL
VIEWER?*
>>
>> Because they are casual viewers.
So too are those in Dealey Plaza. They only saw the event once... the
extant
Z-film can be viewed over and over - and yet it *STILL* can't be seen.
Only by analyzing the film frame by frame can you spot a "slowdown"
This would be easy to test... simply get 100 people in a small theater,
play the
extant Z-film over and over again - as many times as they want to view it,
then
ask them to record on paper what they saw. What you *won't* get is anyone
remarking that the limo slowed down or stopped.
Yet this is precisely what we got in Dealey Plaza. There's a disconnect
between
the eyewitnesses and the alleged film. One or the other is wrong.
>> You answered your own question, moron.
The question was ducked, not answered.
>> The Z film is tracking the limo...obviously that makes it tough to
>> observe a slight slowing of the limo.
The viewers in Dealey Plaza were likewise "tracking the limo." This is a
silly
argument.
The "slight slowing" was a tad more than that... check what Alvarez stated
against the G-forces involved... here for example is what Griffith had to
say:
"Opponents of alteration cite the virtually invisible, extremely brief
slowing
identified by physicist Dr. Luis Alvarez. This slowing occurs from about
Z295-304, as the car decelerates from approximately 12 to 8 mph in half a
second. However, in the film this event is so subtle that it is usually
not
noticed by viewers. No one appears to have noticed it, in fact, until Dr.
Alvarez, through careful study and analysis of the film, detected it. It
seems
highly unlikely that this subtle, half-second slowing is what the
witnesses were
describing when they said the limousine came to a full stop or slowed down
drastically.
* However, the sudden slowing of the limousine from 12 to 8 mph in
Z295-304 does
present another problem for the film's authenticity. Though the slowdown
is not
very noticeable in the film, it represents a deceleration of about 0.37 g.
Physicist Art Snyder notes that such a rapid slowing would be expected to
toss
things around, and he adds that most cars do not decelerate more than 0.4
g.
When one examines the frames immediately after this deceleration, one sees
no
visible effect on the occupants from such a dramatic slowing. The fact
that JFK
is not moved by this deceleration is particularly interesting because he
no
longer had voluntary muscular control and should have been thrown forward.
Yet
for many frames before and after this event he appears to be quite
immobile. So,
assuming Dr. Alvarez's data are accurate, the sudden reduction in speed
that he
detected would seem to constitute further evidence of alteration in the
Zapruder
film. Could it be that this half-second slowing is a remnant of what was
originally a much longer, more noticeable deceleration?"
>> The film record doesn't show a limo stop-like you seem to think
>> happened.
The eyewitnesses in Dealey Plaza seem to think it happened... I'll take
their
assertions over yours any day.
>> Next question?
>
>I see the dolt Chuckie daShoe is up to his [not so high] highbrow
>nonsense....
>
>Take a seat Chuckie, the nurse will be with you in a few decades --
>ROFLMFAO
If this is the best that the LNT'er crowd can do - it's over.
|
