On May 13, 2:14=A0pm, aeffects <aeffect...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> On May 13, 7:29 am, Ben Holmes <ad...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > Back by popular demand - the 45 Questions that terrify those who try
to =
defend
> > the Warren Commission Re****t. In the past, there have been only two
> > semi-serious attempts to answer them, one by John McAdams, and one by
'B=
ud' (the
> > troll listed below) - Both responses were basically denials of the
facts=
in most
> > of the 'answers'.
>
> > But first, an im****tant note:
>
> > **********************************************************************
> > Im****tant Note for Lurkers - there are many trolls on this forum who's
> > only purpose is to obstruct debate, deny the evidence, and attempt to
> > change message threads from discussing the evidence, to personal
insults=
> > and attacks.
>
> > These trolls include (but are not limited to):
>
> > Baldoni
> > Bigdog
> > Bill
> > Brokedad
> > Bud
> > Burlyguard
> > Cdddraftsman
> > Chuck Schuyler
> > Chu...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Curious
> > David Von Pein
> > Ed Dolan *
> > Justme1952
> > Martybaugh...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Miss Rita
> > much...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > much...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sam Brown
> > Spiffy_one
> > Timst...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Todd W. Vaughan
> > YoHarvey
>
> > Please beware when seeing their responses, and note that they will
simpl=
y
> > deny the facts I mention, demand citations that I've provided before,
or=
> > simply run with insults. These trolls are only good material for the
kil=
l
> > files.
>
> > * Eddie 'Disgrace' Dolan is an exception - he *should* be killfiled,
but=
he's
> > amusing! And being a former Marine, even a disgraced one, is a plus.
> > **********************************************************************
>
> > 29. Why do over 40 eyewitnesses agree with each other on the location
of=
the
> > large wound on the back of JFK's head, in contradiction to the BOH
photo=
? Dr.
> > Mantik has re****ted that using stereo viewing, the "hair patch" shows
2D=
,
> > contrary to everything else, which shows in 3D. =A0Many have noted the
"=
wet"
> > appearance of the hair patch. Interestingly, the lateral X-ray also
has =
a "white
> > patch" at this same location - Dr. Mantik re****ts that optical density
> > measurements of this "patch" show that JFK was a "bonehead"... solid
bon=
e all
> > the way across. =A0Why is there such a distinct and common pattern
among=
> > eyewitnesses, BOH photo, and Lateral X-ray?
>
> What? The Lone Nutters and the trolls have nothing to say concerning
> 40 eyewitnesses, x-rays and density measurements, BOH photo? The hell
> you say..... Are they finally at a lose of words, don't know where to
> turn, or whom to call?- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
David,
If you switch hands, Ben will think he's getting some "strange".
Todd
|
