"Todd W. Vaughan" <twvaughan2005@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:9ca315cc-0bd1-49ea-9395-8582ba7944d9@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
May 13, 2:57 pm, "tomnln" <tom...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> BUMP>>> http://whokilledjfk.net/todd_vaughan.htm
> BUMP>>> http://whokilledjfk.net/todd_vaughan.htm
> BUMP>>> http://whokilledjfk.net/todd_vaughan.htm
> BUMP>>> http://whokilledjfk.net/todd_vaughan.htm
Yoour web page starts off with a lie.
I never, everm threatend to visit you, and I challenge you to prove
otherwise.
#1. What the heck is "EVERM"
#2. What the heck is "Yoour"? aren't you the asshole who flaunts
other
people's typo's?
#3. When Yoour Asshole girlfriend steve barber suggested it to you, even
offering to do the driving;
Yoo never "Rejected the offer".
#4. Yoour Other girlfriend, robber spent also stated he'd be at my home
on
Thanksgiving.
(Another Chicken**** Liar)
Yoour a coward who RUNS from yoour own evidence/testimony.
That I Beat the **** outta yoou with.>>>
http://whokilledjfk.net/todd_vaughan.htm
Yoou decided to engage in personal insults.
SO, I BEAT THE **** OUTTA YOO AGAIN.
RUN some More you coward>>>
http://whokilledjfk.net/PROVEN%20LIES.htm
http://whokilledjfk.net/CASE%20DISMISSED.htm
Address those or, go make another CARTOON ! ! !
BUMP>>> http://whokilledjfk.net/todd_vaughan.htm
BUMP>>> http://whokilledjfk.net/todd_vaughan.htm
BUMP>>> http://whokilledjfk.net/todd_vaughan.htm
BUMP>>> http://whokilledjfk.net/todd_vaughan.htm
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> "Todd W. Vaughan" <twvaughan2...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in
>
messagenews:d99e0e5d-90ef-4bcf-8d3e-546349f8df6f@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On May 13, 2:14 pm, aeffects <aeffect...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On May 13, 7:29 am, Ben Holmes <ad...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> > > Back by popular demand - the 45 Questions that terrify those who try
> > > to
> > > defend
> > > the Warren Commission Re****t. In the past, there have been only two
> > > semi-serious attempts to answer them, one by John McAdams, and one
by
> > > 'Bud' (the
> > > troll listed below) - Both responses were basically denials of the
> > > facts
> > > in most
> > > of the 'answers'.
>
> > > But first, an im****tant note:
>
> > >
**********************************************************************
> > > Im****tant Note for Lurkers - there are many trolls on this forum
who's
> > > only purpose is to obstruct debate, deny the evidence, and attempt
to
> > > change message threads from discussing the evidence, to personal
> > > insults
> > > and attacks.
>
> > > These trolls include (but are not limited to):
>
> > > Baldoni
> > > Bigdog
> > > Bill
> > > Brokedad
> > > Bud
> > > Burlyguard
> > > Cdddraftsman
> > > Chuck Schuyler
> > > Chu...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Curious
> > > David Von Pein
> > > Ed Dolan *
> > > Justme1952
> > > Martybaugh...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Miss Rita
> > > much...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > much...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Sam Brown
> > > Spiffy_one
> > > Timst...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Todd W. Vaughan
> > > YoHarvey
>
> > > Please beware when seeing their responses, and note that they will
> > > simply
> > > deny the facts I mention, demand citations that I've provided
before,
> > > or
> > > simply run with insults. These trolls are only good material for the
> > > kill
> > > files.
>
> > > * Eddie 'Disgrace' Dolan is an exception - he *should* be killfiled,
> > > but
> > > he's
> > > amusing! And being a former Marine, even a disgraced one, is a plus.
> > >
**********************************************************************
>
> > > 29. Why do over 40 eyewitnesses agree with each other on the
location
> > > of
> > > the
> > > large wound on the back of JFK's head, in contradiction to the BOH
> > > photo? Dr.
> > > Mantik has re****ted that using stereo viewing, the "hair patch"
shows
> > > 2D,
> > > contrary to everything else, which shows in 3D. Many have noted the
> > > "wet"
> > > appearance of the hair patch. Interestingly, the lateral X-ray also
> > > has
> > > a "white
> > > patch" at this same location - Dr. Mantik re****ts that optical
density
> > > measurements of this "patch" show that JFK was a "bonehead"... solid
> > > bone all
> > > the way across. Why is there such a distinct and common pattern
among
> > > eyewitnesses, BOH photo, and Lateral X-ray?
>
> > What? The Lone Nutters and the trolls have nothing to say concerning
> > 40 eyewitnesses, x-rays and density measurements, BOH photo? The hell
> > you say..... Are they finally at a lose of words, don't know where to
> > turn, or whom to call?- Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -
>
> David,
>
> If you switch hands, Ben will think he's getting some "strange".
>
> Todd- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
|
