Back by popular demand - the 45 Questions that terrify those who try to
defend
the Warren Commission Re****t. In the past, there have been only two
semi-serious attempts to answer them, one by John McAdams, and one by
'Bud' (the
troll listed below) - Both responses were basically denials of the facts
in most
of the 'answers'.
But first, an im****tant note:
**********************************************************************
Im****tant Note for Lurkers - there are many trolls on this forum who's
only purpose is to obstruct debate, deny the evidence, and attempt to
change message threads from discussing the evidence, to personal insults
and attacks.
These trolls include (but are not limited to):
Baldoni
Bigdog
Bill
Brokedad
Bud
Burlyguard
Cdddraftsman
Chuck Schuyler
Chucks@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Von Pein
Ed Dolan *
Justme1952
Martybaughman@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Rita
mucher1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Brown
Spiffy_one
Timstter@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
W. Vaughan
YoHarvey
Please beware when seeing their responses, and note that they will simply
deny the facts I mention, demand citations that I've provided before, or
simply run with insults. These trolls are only good material for the kill
files.
* Eddie 'Disgrace' Dolan is an exception - he *should* be killfiled, but
he's
amusing! And being a former Marine, even a disgraced one, is a plus.
**********************************************************************
30. Somewhat related to the previous question, why does the Autopsy Re****t
contradict the BOH photo? (The Autopsy Re****t stated that the wound
extended to
the occipital, and was *devoid* of bone and scalp... this simply cannot be
seen
in the BOH photo.) No LNT'er has been able to point to *any* part of the
Occipital that cannot be seen in the BOH photo - yet the autopsy re****t,
*all*
prosectors, and over 40 eyewitnesses place a large wound here that was
devoid of
bone and scalp.
|
