Back by popular demand - the 45 Questions that terrify those who try to
defend
the Warren Commission Re****t. In the past, there have been only two
semi-serious attempts to answer them, one by John McAdams, and one by
'Bud' (the
troll listed below) - Both responses were basically denials of the facts
in most
of the 'answers'.
But first, an im****tant note:
**********************************************************************
Im****tant Note for Lurkers - there are many trolls on this forum who's
only purpose is to obstruct debate, deny the evidence, and attempt to
change message threads from discussing the evidence, to personal insults
and attacks.
These trolls include (but are not limited to):
Baldoni
Bigdog
Bill
Brokedad
Bud
Burlyguard
Cdddraftsman
Chuck Schuyler
Chucks@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Von Pein
Ed Dolan *
Justme1952
Martybaughman@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Rita
mucher1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Brown
Spiffy_one
Timstter@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
W. Vaughan
YoHarvey
Please beware when seeing their responses, and note that they will simply
deny the facts I mention, demand citations that I've provided before, or
simply run with insults. These trolls are only good material for the kill
files.
* Eddie 'Disgrace' Dolan is an exception - he *should* be killfiled, but
he's
amusing! And being a former Marine, even a disgraced one, is a plus.
**********************************************************************
31. Why did the WC misrepresent so much of their evidence, even to the
point of
outright lies at some points? The statements about Mrs. Tice, for
example, or
the date that Oswald left England...
LNT'ers will continue to deny, claim that these have already been
answered, or
run away from responding - but you can't convince lurkers with such
tactics.
These are reasonable questions concerning the evidence - and the fact that
LNT'ers can't answer them points to the real solution.
|
