WHO is toad vaughan?>>> http://whokilledjfk.net/todd_vaughan.htm
Watch him RUN>>>
http://whokilledjfk.net/PROVEN%20LIES.htm
http://whokilledjfk.net/CASE%20DISMISSED.htm
"Todd W. Vaughan" <twvaughan2005@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:00dfd69a-7d02-49e0-9e92-d2d878eb8cc0@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
May 15, 3:28 am, aeffects <aeffect...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> On May 14, 5:07 pm, "Todd W. Vaughan" <twvaughan2...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On May 14, 5:23 pm, aeffects <aeffect...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> > > On May 14, 6:49 am, Ben Holmes <ad...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> > > > Back by popular demand - the 45 Questions that terrify those who
try
> > > > to defend
> > > > the Warren Commission Re****t. In the past, there have been only
two
> > > > semi-serious attempts to answer them, one by John McAdams, and one
> > > > by 'Bud' (the
> > > > troll listed below) - Both responses were basically denials of the
> > > > facts in most
> > > > of the 'answers'.
>
> > > > But first, an im****tant note:
>
> > > >
**********************************************************************
> > > > Im****tant Note for Lurkers - there are many trolls on this forum
> > > > who's
> > > > only purpose is to obstruct debate, deny the evidence, and attempt
> > > > to
> > > > change message threads from discussing the evidence, to personal
> > > > insults
> > > > and attacks.
>
> > > > These trolls include (but are not limited to):
>
> > > > Baldoni
> > > > Bigdog
> > > > Bill
> > > > Brokedad
> > > > Bud
> > > > Burlyguard
> > > > Cdddraftsman
> > > > Chuck Schuyler
> > > > Chu...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > Curious
> > > > David Von Pein
> > > > Ed Dolan *
> > > > Justme1952
> > > > Martybaugh...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > Miss Rita
> > > > much...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > much...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > Sam Brown
> > > > Spiffy_one
> > > > Timst...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > Todd W. Vaughan
> > > > YoHarvey
>
> > > > Please beware when seeing their responses, and note that they will
> > > > simply
> > > > deny the facts I mention, demand citations that I've provided
> > > > before, or
> > > > simply run with insults. These trolls are only good material for
the
> > > > kill
> > > > files.
>
> > > > * Eddie 'Disgrace' Dolan is an exception - he *should* be
killfiled,
> > > > but he's
> > > > amusing! And being a former Marine, even a disgraced one, is a
plus.
> > > >
**********************************************************************
>
> > > > 30. Somewhat related to the previous question, why does the
Autopsy
> > > > Re****t
> > > > contradict the BOH photo? (The Autopsy Re****t stated that the
wound
> > > > extended to
> > > > the occipital, and was *devoid* of bone and scalp... this simply
> > > > cannot be seen
> > > > in the BOH photo.) No LNT'er has been able to point to *any* part
of
> > > > the
> > > > Occipital that cannot be seen in the BOH photo - yet the autopsy
> > > > re****t, *all*
> > > > prosectors, and over 40 eyewitnesses place a large wound here that
> > > > was devoid of
> > > > bone and scalp.
>
> > > scarcely a mouse-peep, Lone Nut suckers are really ducking for cover
> > > the past few day's-
>
> > That's the pot calling the kettle black.
>
> the question son..... focus Nutter!
What's the matter, David? Didn't mommy and daddy spank your behind
enough when you came home with stories you couldn't sup****t?
>
>
>
> > Hide quoted text -
>
> > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
|
