On May 16, 1:34=A0pm, aeffects <aeffect...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> On May 16, 9:26 am, YoHarvey <bailey...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On May 16, 11:44 am, aeffects <aeffect...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> > > On May 9, 12:46 pm, "pjspe...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
" <pjspe...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> > > > Hidden within the recent attacks on my character by Dale Myers,
post=
ed on
> > > > the alt.assassination.jfk newsgroup by David Von Pein, are several
> > > > acknowledgments by Myers that I was correct about some key issues.
>
> > > > In Von Pein's May 1, 2008 post of an email by Myers, Myers writes
"T=
he
> > > > movements of JBC and the jumpseat (as shown in the ABC/ History
Chan=
nel
> > > > program and the Discovery Channel program), demonstrating the
differ=
ences
> > > > between prominent conspiracy-based illustrations and reality, were
d=
one in
> > > > unison for clarity. Any charges to the contrary are false."
>
> > > > This is as good as a confession that Myers knew the jumpseat was
not=
6
> > > > inches in from the door when he created animation showing it to be
6=
> > > > inches from the door. He now insists the center of Connally was 6
in=
ches
> > > > inboard of Kennedy, but that the jump seat on which he was riding
wa=
s only
> > > > 2 1/2 inches in from the door. I wonder how many millions of
people,=
> > > > seeing Myers animation, and seeing Connally sitting comfortably in
t=
he
> > > > middle of his chair in a direct line of a bullet exiting Kennedy's
n=
eck,
> > > > suspected Myers and ABC and the Discovery Channel knew Connally
was =
not
> > > > sitting comfortably in his chair in the direct line of fire, but
was=
> > > > inexplicably scooted way to his left, hanging off the edge of his
se=
at? I
> > > > wonder how many of them would have believed Myers' trajectories if
i=
t
> > > > showed Connally in this position? =A0I wonder how many of them
would=
feel
> > > > deceived to find out that Connally's sitting comfortably in the
midd=
le of
> > > > his seat was merely a Myers invention designed to "clarify" things
f=
or
> > > > them?
>
> > > > Some might call this an out-and-out fraud perpetrated on the
public.=
>
> > > > In both Von Pein's May 1, 2008 email denouncing my criticisms, and
a=
May
> > > > 8, 2008 post of a commentary by Myers from his website, Myers
acknow=
ledges
> > > > another mistake as well. In an effort to debunk my criticism of
his =
using
> > > > distorted images in his overhead views of the single-bullet
theory, =
Myers
> > > > has asserted:
>
> > > > "(Speer) continues to claim that the Connally (JBC) figure was
shrun=
k (as
> > > > was the jumpseat) to accomodate the SBT. He now uses images of my
wo=
rk
> > > > culled from the Discovery Channel program "Beyond the Magic
Bullet" =
to
> > > > promote this nonsense. Even a cursory look at the images should
tell=
> > > > anyone with a brain that the images used by Mr. Speer are at an
angl=
e to
> > > > the viewer (i..e, the right side of the image is falling away from
t=
he
> > > > viewer). This is due to the fact that the images are being filmed
di=
rectly
> > > > off my computer monitor and that the camera filming these images
is
> > > > viewing the monitor at a considerable angle. This can be seen in
any=
of
> > > > the wide angle shots in which I am visible alongside the monitor
(no=
ne of
> > > > which, BTW, are included in Speer's presentation). If Mr. Speer
had =
shown
> > > > his viewers those wide angle views, it would be obvious that the
rea=
son
> > > > JBC (and the jumpseat) appears smaller is because of the
camera/moni=
tor
> > > > relation****p."
>
> > > > While Myers attempted to insult my intelligence, he, in fact,
oversh=
ot and
> > > > hit his sup****ters as well. I'd come forward with my complaints
abou=
t the
> > > > distorted images years ago. No one to my knowledge, including
Myers,=
until
> > > > this response, had ever suggested the images were distorted
because =
the
> > > > animation--the animation shown round the world to convince people
th=
e
> > > > single-bullet trajectories worked, mind you--was shot at an angle
fr=
om a
> > > > computer monitor. David Von Pein, one of my Myers' biggest
sup****ter=
s,
> > > > still has trouble believing it.
>
> > > I was informed (by 6th Floor Museum [a few years back]) Myers used
Z-
> > > frame images captured from a 1" VT. If that is true, and I suspect
it
> > > was a canard, incredibly dumb, when 4x5 trannies were available...
not=
> > > to mention videotape pulldown issues... all of course would lend to
> > > any, ANY inherent film blur problems, especially concerning film
> > > camera panning. Supposedly direct from a film lab in San Francisco.
> > > The same SF film lab (Monaco Film Lab completed work on the alleged
in=
-
> > > camera Z-film. At onetime, the labs website touted the fact they did
> > > color correction work on the "JFK assassination, original Zapruder
> > > film --
>
> > > > Lost in the catcalls of Myers' sup****ters (ha ha ha--Myers called
Pa=
t
> > > > stupid--ha ha ha) are the ramifications of his assertion. By
admitti=
ng the
> > > > images used in the program were distorted, Myers is as much as
admit=
ting
> > > > that his whole presentation in 2004's Beyond the Magic Bullet was
> > > > irrelevant. No, it's actually much worse. =A0Since the program's
cre=
ators
> > > > added a trajectory angle onto Myers' distorted figures that lined
up=
> > > > perfectly with their wounds, Myers is as much as admitting that
the
> > > > single-bullet theory--which he set out to prove some years
ago--and =
which
> > > > he calls the "single-bullet fact," does not work on undistorted
figu=
res.
>
> > > > While I've given Myers a hard time, and have received a
substantial =
amount
> > > > of abuse in return, I believe Myers' acknowledgment of the failure
o=
f his
> > > > animation to demonstrate the single-bullet theory, was probably
wort=
h it.
> > > > Now we can all stop pretending the alignment of Kennedy and
Connally=
, and
> > > > thus the likelihood of the single-bullet theory, has been
"proven".
>
> > > I suspect the very reason why DM Lightwave Zapruder film-"Case
Closed"=
> > > project files aren't available for other reseachers to critically
> > > review and verify Myers on-camera claim of, "Case Closed"... Appears
> > > HBO needs to review this too!
>
> > > > Pat Speer, May 08, 2008- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > - Show quoted text -
>
>
>http://www.americanthinker.com/2007/11/jfk_truthers_finally_losing_gr...
>
> focus, son.... the thread topic..... gird those ONI (Office of Naval
> Intelligence) loins- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
Healy? Being recognized as the clown you are, when did sticking to a
thread subject ever have any bearing on you? You demonstrate the
brains of jello. What do ya think Healy? Drugs from Nam or diseases
from the wife? Which one?
|
