TOP POST
Hi Toots,
Say, if this is such a good question by Benny, as you claim, why has
he provided nothing specific to back up what he asserts?
If he is claiming recent prior assassination attempts then he should
put some links up.
Oswald's wasn't the first attempt to kill Kennedy, nor was it Oswald's
first attempt at murder. It was, however, the best, and his best.
Regards,
Tim Brennan
Sydney, Australia
*Newsgroup(s) Commentator*
On May 17, 1:15=A0am, aeffects <aeffect...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> On May 16, 7:53 am, Ben Holmes <ad...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > Back by popular demand - the 45 Questions that terrify those who try
to =
defend
> > the Warren Commission Re****t. In the past, there have been only two
> > semi-serious attempts to answer them, one by John McAdams, and one by
'B=
ud' (the
> > troll listed below) - Both responses were basically denials of the
facts=
in most
> > of the 'answers'.
>
> > But first, an im****tant note:
>
> > **********************************************************************
> > Im****tant Note for Lurkers - there are many trolls on this forum who's
> > only purpose is to obstruct debate, deny the evidence, and attempt to
> > change message threads from discussing the evidence, to personal
insults=
> > and attacks.
>
> > These trolls include (but are not limited to):
>
> > Baldoni
> > Bigdog
> > Bill
> > Brokedad
> > Bud
> > Burlyguard
> > Cdddraftsman
> > Chuck Schuyler
> > Chu...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Curious
> > David Von Pein
> > Ed Dolan *
> > Justme1952
> > Martybaugh...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Miss Rita
> > much...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > much...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sam Brown
> > Spiffy_one
> > Timst...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Todd W. Vaughan
> > YoHarvey
>
> > Please beware when seeing their responses, and note that they will
simpl=
y
> > deny the facts I mention, demand citations that I've provided before,
or=
> > simply run with insults. These trolls are only good material for the
kil=
l
> > files.
>
> > * Eddie 'Disgrace' Dolan is an exception - he *should* be killfiled,
but=
he's
> > amusing! And being a former Marine, even a disgraced one, is a plus.
> > **********************************************************************
>
> > The silence has been deafening... on to the next:
>
> > 32. There were known assassination attempts in both Chicago and Tampa
in=
the
> > weeks before the successful assassination attempt in Dallas.
=A0Although=
the
> > Chicago attempt was successfully kept out of the papers, this isn't
true=
of the
> > Tampa attempt - which made it into one article. Why did the Secret
Servi=
ce not
> > inform the WC of these past attempts, and what can explain the WC's
"ign=
orance"
> > of these previous assassination attempts? =A0Why do LNT'ers refuse to
ev=
en *admit*
> > that these attempts are historical and known?
>
> > And, I might add, (although an honest answer would be a surprise) what
d=
oes the
> > fact of these two previous attempts suggest in terms of a "Lone
Nut/Cons=
piracy"
> > theory of Dallas?
>
> two (2) previous assassination attempts and little old lone nut-LHO
> snuck through the crack?
>
> Yet, Nutters hide from the above question too? Oh, my!
>
> WCR evidence has fallen apart. Now this: info re prior assassination
> attempts buried for unknown reasons.... (was LHO in Chicago and Tampa
> those day's? Isn't that the general MO of Lone Nut assassins: follow
> the target around for weeks, months on end waiting for the right
> moment....- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
|
