On May 16, 7:53 am, Ben Holmes <ad...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> Back by popular demand - the 45 Questions that terrify those who try to
defend
> the Warren Commission Re****t. In the past, there have been only two
> semi-serious attempts to answer them, one by John McAdams, and one by
'Bud' (the
> troll listed below) - Both responses were basically denials of the facts
in most
> of the 'answers'.
>
> But first, an im****tant note:
>
> **********************************************************************
> Im****tant Note for Lurkers - there are many trolls on this forum who's
> only purpose is to obstruct debate, deny the evidence, and attempt to
> change message threads from discussing the evidence, to personal insults
> and attacks.
>
> These trolls include (but are not limited to):
>
> Baldoni
> Bigdog
> Bill
> Brokedad
> Bud
> Burlyguard
> Cdddraftsman
> Chuck Schuyler
> Chu...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Curious
> David Von Pein
> Ed Dolan *
> Justme1952
> Martybaugh...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Miss Rita
> much...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> much...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sam Brown
> Spiffy_one
> Timst...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Todd W. Vaughan
> YoHarvey
>
> Please beware when seeing their responses, and note that they will
simply
> deny the facts I mention, demand citations that I've provided before, or
> simply run with insults. These trolls are only good material for the
kill
> files.
>
> * Eddie 'Disgrace' Dolan is an exception - he *should* be killfiled, but
he's
> amusing! And being a former Marine, even a disgraced one, is a plus.
> **********************************************************************
>
> The silence has been deafening... on to the next:
>
> 32. There were known assassination attempts in both Chicago and Tampa in
the
> weeks before the successful assassination attempt in Dallas. Although
the
> Chicago attempt was successfully kept out of the papers, this isn't true
of the
> Tampa attempt - which made it into one article. Why did the Secret
Service not
> inform the WC of these past attempts, and what can explain the WC's
"ignorance"
> of these previous assassination attempts? Why do LNT'ers refuse to even
*admit*
> that these attempts are historical and known?
>
> And, I might add, (although an honest answer would be a surprise) what
does the
> fact of these two previous attempts suggest in terms of a "Lone
Nut/Conspiracy"
> theory of Dallas?
Earl Warren allegedly said:
"Never in our lifetimes would we know the entire truth of what
happened in Dallas." When did he make this statement. Can it be read
on a specific do***ent (except quote on Jim Marrs's "Crossfire book")?
If true, did he mean the findings were not quite conclusive?
Thank you.
Pierre
|
