On May 20, 5:18 am, much...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
> On 19 Maj, 23:11, aeffects <aeffect...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On May 16, 7:53 am, Ben Holmes <ad...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> > > Back by popular demand - the 45 Questions that terrify those who try
to defend
> > > the Warren Commission Re****t. In the past, there have been only two
> > > semi-serious attempts to answer them, one by John McAdams, and one
by 'Bud' (the
> > > troll listed below) - Both responses were basically denials of the
facts in most
> > > of the 'answers'.
>
> > > But first, an im****tant note:
>
> > >
**********************************************************************
> > > Im****tant Note for Lurkers - there are many trolls on this forum
who's
> > > only purpose is to obstruct debate, deny the evidence, and attempt
to
> > > change message threads from discussing the evidence, to personal
insults
> > > and attacks.
>
> > > These trolls include (but are not limited to):
>
> > > Baldoni
> > > Bigdog
> > > Bill
> > > Brokedad
> > > Bud
> > > Burlyguard
> > > Cdddraftsman
> > > Chuck Schuyler
> > > Chu...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Curious
> > > David Von Pein
> > > Ed Dolan *
> > > Justme1952
> > > Martybaugh...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Miss Rita
> > > much...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > much...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Sam Brown
> > > Spiffy_one
> > > Timst...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Todd W. Vaughan
> > > YoHarvey
>
> > > Please beware when seeing their responses, and note that they will
simply
> > > deny the facts I mention, demand citations that I've provided
before, or
> > > simply run with insults. These trolls are only good material for the
kill
> > > files.
>
> > > * Eddie 'Disgrace' Dolan is an exception - he *should* be killfiled,
but he's
> > > amusing! And being a former Marine, even a disgraced one, is a plus.
> > >
**********************************************************************
>
> > > The silence has been deafening... on to the next:
>
> > > 32. There were known assassination attempts in both Chicago and
Tampa in the
> > > weeks before the successful assassination attempt in Dallas.
Although the
> > > Chicago attempt was successfully kept out of the papers, this isn't
true of the
> > > Tampa attempt - which made it into one article. Why did the Secret
Service not
> > > inform the WC of these past attempts, and what can explain the WC's
"ignorance"
> > > of these previous assassination attempts? Why do LNT'ers refuse to
even *admit*
> > > that these attempts are historical and known?
>
> > > And, I might add, (although an honest answer would be a surprise)
what does the
> > > fact of these two previous attempts suggest in terms of a "Lone
Nut/Conspiracy"
> > > theory of Dallas?
>
> > Earl Warren allegedly said:
>
> > "Never in our lifetimes would we know the entire truth of what
> > happened in Dallas." When did he make this statement. Can it be read
> > on a specific do***ent (except quote on Jim Marrs's "Crossfire book")?
>
> > If true, did he mean the findings were not quite conclusive?
> > Thank you.
> > Pierre
>
> I don't have Crossfire handy, but doubt that Marrs was quoting
> accurately. From a Vanity Fair article:
>
> "Back in 1964, asked whether his Commission's do***ents would be made
> public, Chief Justice Earl Warren replied, "Yes, there will come a
> time. But it might not be in your lifetime. I am not referring to
> anything especially, but there may be some things that would involve
> security. This would be preserved but not made public."" [NY Times;
> 2/5/64]
>
> http://hometown.aol.com/DRoberdeau/JFK/GHOSTSofNOVEMBERupdate2001.html
thanks munch..... ya got one for the *plus* side, cupboard is pretty
bare though....
> -Mark
|
