On Jul 6, 2:47=EF=BF=BDam, "Martin Shackelford" <msha...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
wro=
te:
> The comment about the letter suggests that my private correspondence
with
> Marina is any of your business. Stuff it, Leyden.
> It's YOUR buddies who delight in posting private correspondence.
> You know very well that I took "follow-up action," via researchers who
> were close to her--and posted the results--something you omit, as usual.
> As for Judyth's husband, you always fail to mention his e-mail and my
> access to his summer 1963 correspondence--and his notoriously poor
> memory (according to his children).
> As for fraud, your declaration hardly establishes that.
> Better a tiger than a jackal like yourself.
>
> Martin
"Stuff it"... Wow! Your comments, Shackelford, show you not only
don't know how to do research, you don't even know the purpose of
research. Clue: It's to find out things you don't already know.`--
i.e., the things Judyth didn't tell you. Judyth made a fool of you
and now you've got to keep coming on the NGs trying to prove she
didn't. Won't wash. Too late.
JGL
>
> <JLeyden...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>
>
news:f2f4a51d-9736-437f-8f23-a9797068946e@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Jul 5, 2:16?am, "Martin Shackelford" <msha...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> wrote:
>
> > You're the one who admits not doing any research, Leyden.
> > You can leave any time you want--but you just try to get others to
leav=
e.
>
> > Martin
>
> Don't even mention the word "research," Shack. =EF=BF=BDYou promoted a
NG
> fraud -- the Judyth Baker fantasy -- in thousands and thousands of
> posts but you were too lazy (or too scared of Judyth) to pick up the
> phone and interview her husband. =EF=BF=BDAfter all, he only lived with
h=
er
> for approx. =EF=BF=BD25 years, so what could he tell you, right? =EF=BF=
=BDAs for
> Marina, you said you sent her a letter (which you never posted in the
> NGs) but you never took any follow-up action. =EF=BF=BDYeah, you're a
rea=
l
> tiger, alright.
>
> JGL
>
>
>
>
>
> > <JLeyden...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>
>
>news:2b3cd594-ca8a-4611-becd-8a865ff7b1cd@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > On Jul 4, 1:43?am, "Martin Shackelford" <msha...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> > > And the propagandist rants on.
> > > This is the same Leyden who says he wants the subject to go
away--but
> > > only
> > > on his terms, of course.
>
> > > Martin
>
> > No, what i want is for you to go away, Shack. ?You and Judyth are like
> > Siamese twins now, joined at the hip. ?When you're here, she's here.
> > You're not going to shake her. ?You've lost all credibility. ?Find
> > another hobby -- one that doesn't require research.
>
> > JGL
>
> > > <JLeyden...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>
> >
>news:39ad9910-866a-47be-9921-a1fafcc7e7ac@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > On Jul 3, 7:30?am, "Martin Shackelford" <msha...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
wrote=
:
>
> > > > I took a break from it. I found quite a few errors in the early
> > > > ****tions,
> > > > and will get back to it sooner or later. It wasn't all that
> > > > impressive.
>
> > > > Martin
>
> > > Gosh, Shack, we found quite a few errors in the Judyth Baker account
> > > -- the Cancun thing, for example -- but you just covered up for her
> > > and kept right on going, promoting this fraud in thousands and
> > > thousands of NG posts.
>
> > > JGL
>
> > > > "SecretServiceguy" <vincebet...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>
> > >
>news:23a744ca-49d3-48d3-92af-56973fcfe4e1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> > > > > Martin,
>
> > > > > I seem to recall reading last year somewhere on the newsgroups
th=
at
> > > > > you were reading Bugliosi's entire book (including the
footnotes,
> > > > > endnotes, disc, etc.) and were going to make a detailed
*****smen=
t a
> > > > > la your classic Investigator article on Posner's book. How is it
> > > > > going? Are you able to debunk his book????
>
> > > > > Vince Palamara
> > > > >http://www.youtube.com/user/VincePalamara-Hidequotedtext
-
>
> > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
|
