Re: MISC. JFK ASSASSINATION ARGUMENTS

>>> "The skull can be extensively fractured underneath intact scalp." <<<

Yes, I would certainly agree with you here.


Which begs the question.....

How in the world could ANY of the Parkland witnesses have possibly
seen a great-big, gaping HOLE in the BACK of JFK's head if the scalp
of JFK was completely intact in the back of his head (which, of
course, it was, as we can see in the autopsy photos)?

And even John Canal concedes that any scalp "tear" would have been a
fairly-small one. (Right John?) Which certainly doesn't equate to
anything like what the Parkland people described -- i.e., a large,
gaping hole in the BOH.

How does a small little tear in the scalp (and John C. can't prove
that even a small tear existed and was then stitched up before the
pics were snapped) turn into the Parkland people being able to see a
huge hole in the BOH?

Baden was right. The answer is "pooling". The witnesses were fooled.
Simple as that.