On Jul 8, 10:51 am, curtjester1 <curtjest...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> On Jul 7, 11:52 am,Bud<sirsl...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Jul 7, 8:41 am, curtjester1 <curtjest...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> > > On Jul 6, 5:58 pm,Bud<sirsl...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> > > > On Jul 6, 8:14 pm, curtjester1 <curtjest...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> > > > > On Jul 6, 2:34 pm,Bud<sirsl...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> > > > > > On Jul 6, 10:20 am, curtjester1 <curtjest...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
wrote:
>
> > > > > > > On Jul 5, 10:30 pm, David Von Pein <davevonp...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > Geesh, what a kook (Jester this time).
>
> > > > > > > Just like Johnnie Cochran....if the shoe's don't fit, you
must acquit.
>
> > > > > > > CJ
>
> > > > > > Yah, Johnnie was misrepresenting his situation also. But,
if kooks
> > > > > > couldn`t make absolute assertions from blurry film, they`d
have
> > > > > > nothing at all.
>
> > > > > Of course you have to invent shadows for some kinds of wacky
> > > > > discoloration theory, but you avoid something way more glaring,
and
> > > > > that is the fact that they said they jumped down the curb onto
the
> > > > > street when the motorcade when JFK's limo approached. Also you
avoid
> > > > > the facts that they took pictures and calculated that the photo
taken
> > > > > at the time of the headshot couldn't have matched any position
on the
> > > > > grass. And of course everything else was in nice color except
for the
> > > > > feet. Also the ladies appear way to small for all the
surrounding
> > > > > objects. You can do better than 'the shadow knows',Bud.
>
> > > > > CJ
>
> > > > Far be it from me to try a dissuade a kook when he thinks
things
> > > > are fishy, CJ. Heres to 40 more years of "this don`t look right to
me,
> > > > you better explain it to my satisfaction or I will believe stupid
> > > > ****".- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > - Show quoted text -
>
> > > Yep, there are about a 100 things in the photographs and films AFTER
> > > they have been messed with that still don't jibe with human logic.
> > > So, don't just pick on the shoesBud. If LNT'ers aren't going to get
> > > passed one glaring event, what makes a CT'er think that there going
to
> > > get anywhere with the other 99 events?!
>
> > > CJ
>
> > Where are you going with them, Curt? Where can you go with "this
> > doesn`t look right to me? Should the government gather experts to
> > explain these things to you once more? Would that do any good, don`t
> > you prefer to think they are fishy?- Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -
>
> Bud, the government has imposed it's will on the witnesses, the police
> force, by intimidating and killing when necessary when there was any
> flak that went against the anything-other-than-Oswald theory.
Thats just stupid ****, Curt. What Dealy witness was killed for not
playing ball the day of the assassination? What TSBD witness? What Oak
Cliff witness?
> Of
> course their 'experts'are people like you who simply sell their souls
> to the company store and have the gall to act like they are doing
> their patriotic duties.
You think it should be left to idiots like yourself? "Duh, this
don`t look right to me." OK, it doesn`t look right to you. Now what?
> At least we can have the satisfaction of
> knowing and occasionally letting people know just how evil they are
> and what lengths they will go to propogate their will on the
> citizenry. We don't have to depend on Sun****ne to be the cause of
> Bad Shadows. We can go to the evidence.
But you can`t understand the evidence, and resist all attempts at
explaining it to you.
> People who say they were
> out on the street trumps the camera.
People who say there was a dog in the limo must also trump the
camera. Yet the person was wrong, and the camera was right.
> We have the Bronson film
> showing all the pretty shoes from behind, and yet Mary is still white,
> and Jean is at the curb stepping with something black on the bottom of
> her long appedange instead of white. We don't run, hide, distort,
> and make up wild theories, like youBud.
You don`t understand photography, and the way details become
distorted in film. Experts are needed, not idiots with one finger up
their nose saying it doesn`t look right. Or junkies.
> CJ
|
