Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Alternative > Conspirancy JFK > Re: From the Ji...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 46 of 81 Topic 23611 of 26156
Post > Topic >>

Re: From the Jim Douglass book

by Bud <sirslick@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Jul 15, 2008 at 03:57 AM

On Jul 15, 12:55 am, "Martin Shackelford" <msha...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
wrote:
> Calling someone a kook is a typical way to dismiss a view with which you
> disagree. It's a poor substitute for anything.

   Here I thought it was an accurate use of the word to describe a
person with a fanatical belief in irrational things.

> Martin
>
> "Bud" <sirsl...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>
>
news:a5fc0e6a-ba31-4b6a-a695-59295cbef8da@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> > On Jul 14, 2:17 am, "Martin Shackelford" <msha...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> > wrote:
> >> Why not answer your own questions, Tim--oh, I see that you did.
>
> >   Martin is a garden variety fanatic. He isn`t the least bit
> > interested in the truth behind these events, he only wishes to make
> > them conform to his world view. To this end, kooks like himself
> > convince themselves that the months old remembrances of a printer, who
> > prints batches of material for a variety of people daily, becomes rock
> > solid indisputable evidence. This is the kind of information that
> > kooks have been desperately clinging to for decades. When you don`t
> > have much, you have to take what you can get.
>
> >> Martin
>
> >> <timst...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>
>
>>news:a4f16e06-3cdd-4b8d-8345-f2793719fa51@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> TOP POST
>
> >> Hi Martin,
>
> >> Hmmm, not exactly correct, Martin. No one at Jones Printing seems to
> >> actually offer an ID of who picked up the printing, Martin. You
should
> >> go back and read the statements sometime.
>
> >> As it is, the statements of Jones Printing staff need to be weighed
> >> against the fact of the finding of copies of Oswald's FPCC handbill
in
> >> their records, along with a handwritten draft of same, related
billing
> >> material and then Oswald's own mailing of copies of the handbill to
> >> Vincent Lee (FPCC) and Arnold Johnson (CPUSA) within days of the
print
> >> order being completed.
>
> >> The print order was completed around 4 June, 1963. Quiroga visited
> >> Oswald at 4907 Magazine St on the afternoon or evening of 16 August,
> >> 1963.
>
> >> Your scenario about Quiroga *delivering* the completed pamphlets to
> >> Oswald is entirely implausible, given Oswald posted copies out in
> >> early June, picketed USS Wasp with copies of the leaflets in mid
June,
> >> was arrested (and filmed) on 9 August while leafleting and filmed
> >> again around midday on 16 August passing out the leaflets.
>
> >> Isn't that the case, Martin? Of course it is.
>
> >> Regards,
>
> >> Tim Brennan
> >> Sydney, Australia
> >> *Newsgroup(s) Commentator*
>
> >> On Jul 13, 4:47 pm, "Martin Shackelford" <msha...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> >> wrote:
>
> >> > The printer (Jones) said someone else picked up the leaflets.
> >> > Oswald's landlady said Quiroga delivered them to Oswald.
> >> > These testimonies are consistent.
>
> >> > Martin
>
> >> > <timst...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>
> >>
>news:6c86c0c8-6bd8-4ecd-b006-c49317706fa9@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> > TOP POST
>
> >> > Hi Martin,
>
> >> > Oh, did he?
>
> >> > It's not evidence of about the same worth as your *stack of
leaflets*
> >> > nonsense is it?
>
> >> > The preponderance of evidence, Martin, is that Oswald was solely
> >> > responsible for arranging the printing and distribution of FPCC
> >> > material in New Orleans in mid 1963.
>
> >> > I think any *serious researcher* would conclude that.
>
> >> > Regards,
>
> >> > Tim Brennan
> >> > Sydney, Australia
> >> > *Newsgroup(s) Commentator*
>
> >> > On Jul 12, 4:25 pm, "Martin Shackelford" <msha...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> >> > wrote:
>
> >> > > And the printer said Oswald wasn't the guy who picked up the
flyers.
>
> >> > > Martin
>
> >> > > <timst...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>
> >> >
>news:0f8a9875-e62c-4632-8f2f-9fdd808229d2@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> > > TOP POST
>
> >> > > Hi tomnln,
>
> >> > > Say, which pro Castro literature from the printer would that be
then,
> >> > > tomnln? There were three different items printed.
>
> >> > > Oswald himself said he organised the printing of these items,
tomnln.
>
> >> > > Regards,
>
> >> > > Tim Brennan
> >> > > Sydney, Australia
> >> > > *Newsgroup(s) Commentator*
>
> >> > > On Jul 9, 2:25 am, "tomnln" <tom...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> >> > > > Hi Timmy;
>
> >> > > > Tell us WHO picked up the Pro-Castro literature from the
Printer?
>
> >> > > > We know it was NOT Oswald.
>
> >> > > > <timst...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>
> >> > >
>news:0086d1bd-6b9e-4841-96ba-409170e84b29@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> > > > TOP POST
>
> >> > > > Hi Martin,
>
> >> > > > The claim that Carlos Quiroga delivered a 5 to 6 inch stack of
> >> > > > leaflets to Oswald sounds highly dubious to me.
>
> >> > > > Quiroga was using the address that Oswald had stamped on the
> >> > > > leaflets
> >> > > > that he had given out at International Trade Mart, 4907
Magazine
> >> > > > St,
> >> > > > to locate Oswald in the first place.
>
> >> > > > On the face of it, the landlady story doesn't STACK up, LOL!
:-)
>
> >> > > > Regards,
>
> >> > > > Tim Brennan
> >> > > > Sydney, Australia
> >> > > > *Newsgroup(s) Commentator*
>
> >> > > > On Jul 5, 4:18 pm, "Martin Shackelford" <msha...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> >> > > > wrote:
>
> >> > > > > False Defector program:
> >> > > > > Source: Victor Marchetti, former executive assistant to the
> >> > > > > Director
> >> > > > > of
> >> > > > > CIA
> >> > > > > Details: run out of Nag's Head, North Carolina by Naval
> >> > > > > Intelligence
> >> > > > > in
> >> > > > > 1959,
> >> > > > > involving 36-40 men, sent into the Soviet Union and Eastern
> >> > > > > European
> >> > > > > countries; trained at various naval installations in the U.S.
and
> >> > > > > abroad.
>
> >> > > > > Ruth Paine:
> >> > > > > CIA connections:
> >> > > > > George DeMohrenschildt, directed at Oswald by local CIA man
J.
> >> > > > > Walton Moore, arranged for Ruth to meet Marina. He arranged
> >> > > > > the party at which they met, and brought the Oswalds, and
paid
> >> > > > > close attention to how Ruth and Marina got along. Two months
> >> > > > > later, DeMohrenschildt left for Haiti, and Ruth became the
new
> >> > > > > "Oswald best friend." J. Edgar Hoover advised the Warren
> >> > > > > Commission to suppress do***ents relating to the Paines and
> >> > > > > the DeMohrenschildts.
> >> > > > > Michael Paine worked for defense contractor Bell Helicopter,
a
> >> > > > > flying machine invented by his stepfather. His work involved
a
> >> > > > > security clearance. His mother was a close friend of Mary
> >> > > > > Bancroft, Allen Dulles' mistress. Dulles helped to steer the
> >> > > > > questioning away from these topics.
> >> > > > > Ruth's father, William Avery Hyde, was rewarded with an AID
> >> > > > > contract covering all of Latin America, in a CIA-related
role.
> >> > > > > His re****ts were sent to the CIA.
> >> > > > > Ruth's older sister, Sylvia Hyde Hoke, was a CIA employee by
> >> > > > > 1955 at the latest. Ruth stayed with her in September 1963.
> >> > > > > Sylvia's husband John was also a CIA employee. Ruth went
> >> > > > > from there to New Orleans to pick up Marina. Ruth denied to
> >> > > > > Jim Garrison that she knew which agency Sylvia worked for.
> >> > > > > Marina testified in New Orleans that after the assassination,
the
> >> > > > > Secret Service advised her to avoid Ruth, due to her
connection
> >> > > > > to the CIA.
> >> > > > > Ruth and the TSBD job:
> >> > > > > Ruth told the Warren Commission that she heard about a job
> >> > > > > opening from her neighbor, Linnie Mae Randle, and passed the
> >> > > > > information on to Oswald. Ms. Randle told the Commission she
> >> > > > > hadn't been aware of any job opening.
> >> > > > > When the Texas Employment Commission called to say there was
> >> > > > > a better-paying job available for Oswald, Marina's "friend"
Ruth
> >> > > > > kept the information to herself and never told Oswald. The
job
> >> > > > > was at Trans-Texas Airways. Unlike the TSBD job, it wasn't
> >> > > > > tem****ary, and paid $100 per month more. When the TEC called
> >> > > > > again, they were curtly told Oswald already had a job. She
first
> >> > > > > told the Warren Commission she never knew about the better
job,
> >> > > > > then said she vaguely recalled it, then said Oswald had told
her
> >> > > > > about it, but that it "fell through." Then she admitted
knowing
> >> > > > > about
> >> > > > > the job offer when Oswald was still unemployed--so she had to
> >> > > > > have been the person called by the TEC. She falsely said that
> >> > > > > Oswald had checked on the job, but it had been filled. It
had, of
> >> > > > > course, been filled because she told the TEC he already had a
> >> > > > > job.
> >> > > > > She claimed that he got the info from the TEC and told her
and
> >> > > > > Marina about it--which was impossible. The TEC never talked
> >> > > > > directly with him about it--only the two calls to the Paine
home.
> >> > > > > Marina said that, after he began at the TSBD, he continued to
> >> > > > > answer ads, looking for something better.
>
> >> > > > > The Fair Play for Cuba leaflet delivery:
> >> > > > > The witness who saw Carlos Quiroga visit Oswald was Oswald's
> >> > > > > landlady. She re****ted that Quiroga brought a 5-6 inch stack
of
> >> > > > > leaflets with him.
>
> >> > > > > CIA and Secret Service credentials:
> >> > > > > In June 2007, the CIA finally released its "Family Jewels"
> >> > > > > re****t,
> >> > > > > running to 702 pages. It included a memo by Sidney Gottlieb,
head
> >> > > > > of the Technical Services Division, dated May 8, 1973.
Gottlieb
> >> > > > > stated that his division provided the Secret Service with
"gate
> >> > > > > p*****, security p*****, p***** for presidential campaign,
> >> > > > > emblems
> >> > > > > for presidential vehicles, a secure ID photo system."
Officially,
> >> > > > > the
> >> > > > > Secret Service ID was made by the Bureau of Engraving and
> >> > > > > Printing.
> >> > > > > The CIA could have supplied AUTHENTIC Secret Service
credentials
> >> > > > > for a CIA operation.
>
> >> > > > > Martin- Hide quoted text -
>
> >> > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> >> > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> >> > - Show quoted text -
 




 81 Posts in Topic:
From the Jim Douglass book
"Martin Shackelford&  2008-07-05 02:18:02 
Re: From the Jim Douglass book
lazuli777@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2008-07-05 12:34:52 
Re: From the Jim Douglass book
"Martin Shackelford&  2008-07-06 02:52:28 
Re: From the Jim Douglass book
Ed Dolan <74030.3022@[  2008-07-05 16:34:48 
Re: From the Jim Douglass book
"Martin Shackelford&  2008-07-06 02:54:16 
Re: From the Jim Douglass book
Ben Holmes <admin@[EMA  2008-07-06 09:19:35 
Re: From the Jim Douglass book
timstter@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-07-08 05:44:46 
Re: From the Jim Douglass book
Ed Dolan <74030.3022@[  2008-07-09 17:25:29 
Re: From the Jim Douglass book
Ben Holmes <admin@[EMA  2008-07-09 18:53:21 
Re: From the Jim Douglass book
Ed Dolan <74030.3022@[  2008-07-09 17:40:10 
Re: From the Jim Douglass book
Ben Holmes <admin@[EMA  2008-07-09 19:00:34 
Re: From the Jim Douglass book
timstter@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-07-05 19:46:24 
Re: From the Jim Douglass book
"Martin Shackelford&  2008-07-06 03:05:01 
Re: From the Jim Douglass book
timstter@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-07-06 17:27:51 
Re: From the Jim Douglass book
"Martin Shackelford&  2008-07-07 01:25:53 
Re: From the Jim Douglass book
timstter@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-07-07 15:50:57 
Re: From the Jim Douglass book
"tomnln" <to  2008-07-08 12:25:23 
Re: From the Jim Douglass book
"tomnln" <to  2008-07-11 00:42:16 
Re: From the Jim Douglass book
"tomnln" <to  2008-07-16 14:49:52 
Re: From the Jim Douglass book
timstter@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-07-25 23:30:08 
Re: From the Jim Douglass book
timstter@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-07-11 16:33:24 
Re: From the Jim Douglass book
"tomnln" <to  2008-07-11 21:13:59 
Re: From the Jim Douglass book
"Martin Shackelford&  2008-07-12 02:25:37 
Re: From the Jim Douglass book
"Martin Shackelford&  2008-07-12 02:25:16 
Re: From the Jim Douglass book
Bud <sirslick@[EMAIL P  2008-07-12 03:27:06 
Re: From the Jim Douglass book
timstter@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-07-12 05:19:54 
Re: From the Jim Douglass book
"tomnln" <to  2008-07-12 13:29:07 
Re: From the Jim Douglass book
timstter@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-07-12 05:48:40 
Re: From the Jim Douglass book
"tomnln" <to  2008-07-12 13:30:47 
Re: From the Jim Douglass book
"Martin Shackelford&  2008-07-13 02:47:33 
Re: From the Jim Douglass book
"robcap...@[EMAIL PR  2008-07-12 08:17:05 
Re: From the Jim Douglass book
Bud <sirslick@[EMAIL P  2008-07-12 11:07:05 
Re: From the Jim Douglass book
aeffects <aeffects04@[  2008-07-12 11:18:24 
Re: From the Jim Douglass book
Bud <sirslick@[EMAIL P  2008-07-12 13:53:26 
Re: From the Jim Douglass book
timstter@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-07-13 02:24:37 
Re: From the Jim Douglass book
"tomnln" <to  2008-07-13 12:17:19 
Re: From the Jim Douglass book
timstter@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-07-13 03:07:51 
Re: From the Jim Douglass book
"tomnln" <to  2008-07-13 12:23:04 
Re: From the Jim Douglass book
"Sam Brown" <  2008-07-14 13:52:01 
Re: From the Jim Douglass book
"tomnln" <to  2008-07-14 00:18:55 
Re: From the Jim Douglass book
"Sam Brown" <  2008-07-15 10:55:28 
Re: From the Jim Douglass book
"tomnln" <to  2008-07-14 21:07:15 
Re: From the Jim Douglass book
"Martin Shackelford&  2008-07-14 02:17:06 
Re: From the Jim Douglass book
Bud <sirslick@[EMAIL P  2008-07-14 03:29:23 
Re: From the Jim Douglass book
"Martin Shackelford&  2008-07-15 00:55:48 
Re: From the Jim Douglass book
Bud <sirslick@[EMAIL P  2008-07-15 03:57:48 
Re: From the Jim Douglass book
lazuli777@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2008-07-16 02:27:11 
Re: From the Jim Douglass book
Bud <sirslick@[EMAIL P  2008-07-16 03:26:20 
Re: From the Jim Douglass book
timstter@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-07-16 02:43:44 
Re: From the Jim Douglass book
"tomnln" <to  2008-07-16 09:01:54 
Re: From the Jim Douglass book
Bud <sirslick@[EMAIL P  2008-07-16 03:38:27 
Re: From the Jim Douglass book
"Martin Shackelford&  2008-07-17 01:46:56 
Re: From the Jim Douglass book
lazuli777@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2008-07-17 02:18:00 
Re: From the Jim Douglass book
Bud <sirslick@[EMAIL P  2008-07-17 03:18:44 
Re: From the Jim Douglass book
"Martin Shackelford&  2008-07-18 02:15:10 
Re: From the Jim Douglass book
lazuli777@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2008-07-18 12:36:01 
Re: From the Jim Douglass book
"Martin Shackelford&  2008-07-19 03:22:05 
Re: From the Jim Douglass book
Bud <sirslick@[EMAIL P  2008-07-16 16:02:36 
Re: From the Jim Douglass book
"tomnln" <to  2008-07-16 19:38:40 
Re: From the Jim Douglass book
Bud <sirslick@[EMAIL P  2008-07-16 17:10:08 
Re: From the Jim Douglass book
Bud <sirslick@[EMAIL P  2008-07-17 03:22:14 
Re: From the Jim Douglass book
timstter@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-07-17 03:37:43 
Re: From the Jim Douglass book
"tomnln" <to  2008-07-17 10:16:00 
Re: From the Jim Douglass book
timstter@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-07-17 04:07:47 
Re: From the Jim Douglass book
"tomnln" <to  2008-07-17 10:16:52 
Re: From the Jim Douglass book
timstter@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-07-17 14:57:03 
Re: From the Jim Douglass book
"tomnln" <to  2008-07-17 20:26:32 
Re: From the Jim Douglass book
timstter@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-07-17 16:01:12 
Re: From the Jim Douglass book
"tomnln" <to  2008-07-17 20:37:40 
Re: From the Jim Douglass book
timstter@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-07-20 14:27:43 
Re: From the Jim Douglass book
"tomnln" <to  2008-07-21 12:20:13 
Re: From the Jim Douglass book
timstter@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-07-20 15:44:52 
Re: From the Jim Douglass book
"tomnln" <to  2008-07-21 12:23:07 
Re: From the Jim Douglass book
timstter@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-07-21 02:45:18 
Re: From the Jim Douglass book
timstter@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-07-25 17:04:34 
Re: From the Jim Douglass book
"tomnln" <to  2008-07-25 21:09:29 
Re: From the Jim Douglass book
timstter@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-07-25 18:09:47 
Re: From the Jim Douglass book
"tomnln" <to  2008-07-25 21:11:50 
Re: From the Jim Douglass book
"JLeyden900@[EMAIL P  2008-07-06 08:27:10 
Re: From the Jim Douglass book
Jean <jean.davison1@[E  2008-07-06 19:31:16 
Re: From the Jim Douglass book
Gil Jesus <gjjmail@[EM  2008-07-07 02:33:40 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Wed Dec 3 18:57:08 CST 2008.