Re: 17 APRIL Predicted Nuclear Attack on USA from 17th April,2008 - The ?Prophesied End-Time Revealed

<cisco1663@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message

> Heard tell they already tried to nuke Iran as a preemptive strike,
> but the mission failed because of dissent within the ranks.
>
> Kinda makes you wonder who the real terrorists are in the world.


There isn't much question about it, except in the USA, where the media
lies
freely on behalf of the government to keep the people in darkness.

________________________________________



IRAQ -- ACTIVE DUTY GENERALS WILL "REVOLT" AGAINST BUSH
IF HE MAINTAINS ESCALATION INTO 2008:

http://thinkprogress.org/2007/05/13/generals-revolt/

excerpted from:  "The Progress Re****t"

by Faiz Shakir, Nico Pitney, Amanda Terkel,
Satyam Khanna, and Matt Corley


Appearing on NBC's Chris Matthews Show yesterday, Atlanta
Journal-Constitution editorial page editor Cynthia Tucker reveals
that sources within the military are warning of "a revolt from
active-duty generals if September rolls around and the president
is sticking with the surge into '08.'" Noting that retired generals
such as Gen. John Baptiste have already begun voicing their
discontent with the President's strategy in Iraq, Tucker added
that the generals "don't want to fall by the wayside like the
generals in Vietnam did, kept pu****ng a war that they knew was
lost." When President Bush vetoed the Iraq timeline legislation
earlier this month, he claimed that "the measure would 'impose
impossible conditions on our commanders in combat' by forcing
them to 'take fighting directions from politicians 6,000 miles away
in Wa****ngton, DC." But despite past claims that "the right force
level" will be determined by "the sober judgment of our military
leaders," the Bush administration has a proven track record of
disregarding the advice of military leaders. As recently as last
December, when the White House was first pu****ng its escalation
plan, the administration explicitly ignored "the unanimous disagreement
of the Joint Chiefs of Staff." If Tucker's sources are correct, it appears
the commanders on the ground in Iraq are getting tired of "taking fighting
directions" from the politician "6,000 miles away" in the White House.
And they might not stay quiet for long.

http://www.wa****ngtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/12/18/AR2006121801477.html